https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101908
--- Comment #48 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3174d6183e5c042e822d9feabb670235b737441
commit r12-7990-ge3174d6183e5c042e822d9feabb670235b737441
Author: liuhongt
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105156
--- Comment #4 from Keith Thompson ---
OK, that explains the bug.
It sounds like the code that suppresses warnings in system headers needs
to be a bit more clever. Using UINT_MAX here isn't an error in the header.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105156
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Add -Wsystem-headers and you will get a warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105156
--- Comment #2 from Keith Thompson ---
Andrew, did you use "-std=c17 -pedantic-errors"? Both gcc and clang
correctly diagnose "enum { toobig = 0x7fff * 2U + 1U };".
I'm seeing weird behavior that I don't understand. Replacing the UINT_MAX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner ---
Sorry for the delay, but getting back to this now...
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #6)
> What I should have said is that -mlongcall code is correct but is
> missing a sibcall optimisation. -fno-plt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105156
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105156
Bug ID: 105156
Summary: No diagnostic for `enum { toobig = UINT_MAX }`
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103650
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104542
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104098
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105027
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105027
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed for 11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91728
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105155
Bug ID: 105155
Summary: -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow failed to check an
overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105152
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105154
Bug ID: 105154
Summary: std::expected::swap missing reset _M_has_value
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105153
Bug ID: 105153
Summary: wrong constraint in std::expected's constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104985
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
"machine_mode m" I understand of course. "rtx m" is something different :-)
I didn't see the patch yet, sorry, will get to it later today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104985
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #14)
> Are you sure this only ever handles pseudos? It is completely broken if not.
Yes, I am.
All the 4 uses of SUBST_MODE look like:
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104985
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Are you sure this only ever handles pseudos? It is completely broken if not.
Changing the mode of regno_reg_rtx[...] is always wrong, too.
Patches 2 and 3 look better, but need a lot more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103083
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f939ac1e295f38624c82fa75fa798e83d825232
commit r11-9775-g4f939ac1e295f38624c82fa75fa798e83d825232
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105148
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-04
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105152
Bug ID: 105152
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in
gfc_conv_gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc, at
fortran/trans-expr.cc:5647
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105151
Bug ID: 105151
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in gimple_range_global, at
value-query.cc:424
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105150
Bug ID: 105150
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -Ofast: verify_gimple
failed
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105149
Bug ID: 105149
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at
tree-ssa.cc:1211
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105148
Bug ID: 105148
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_use, at
tree-ssa.cc:881
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105147
Bug ID: 105147
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/pr105140.c introduced in
r12-7979-geaaf77dd85c333 has excess errors
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105146
Bug ID: 105146
Summary: std::bad_expected_access constructor missing std::move
for error type
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105145
Bug ID: 105145
Summary: dropped DWARF location information at -O1/-O2/-O3 upon
ftree-dse
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328
--- Comment #24 from Avi Kivity ---
Many thanks for the patch and the commit. Can we have it backported to 11.x?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105141
Ivan Sorokin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vanyacpp at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103852
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|12.0
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101894
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Known to fail|12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101894
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3afc7c4eeada0a04c2c4ededeb0f6ccc724a58ec
commit r12-7985-g3afc7c4eeada0a04c2c4ededeb0f6ccc724a58ec
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103852
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a11f204e5a30d1dfd2508e3f3014509a0342f604
commit r12-7984-ga11f204e5a30d1dfd2508e3f3014509a0342f604
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104049
--- Comment #15 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #14)
>
> So IMO we should fix RTL representation problem that Andrew pointed
> out in comment 7 as the P1 fix, then accept the other cases as a P2
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104639
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #11)
> I don't know. I thought return's were special. Can there be more than one
> per function?
I think high gimple (what before lower pass) allows multiple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103147
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103147
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I think it makes sense to ignore -fpack-struct for the intrinsic API/ABI
defined types. OTOH using the option in general doesn't make much sense so an
#if __GCC_PACK_STRUCT
#error "do not use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102314
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P4
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105010
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100810
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Testcase from PR102902, since it runtime times-out difficult to adapt to the
testsuite bug fixed by both proposed patches.
[576] % gcctk -O2 small.c; ./a.out
[577] %
[577] % gcctk -O3 small.c
[578] %
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100810
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 102902 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102902
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105142
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52744|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105144
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105144
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f0610acbc056052a108e4a46911fc21d0dca2ab
commit r12-7983-g2f0610acbc056052a108e4a46911fc21d0dca2ab
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105139
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
*movv2qi_internal was not fixed in the same way as *movhi_internal, so:
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/mmx.md b/gcc/config/i386/mmx.md
index 29d470bdef2..197f19e4b1a 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/mmx.md
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772
--- Comment #44 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Rainer, for pr80334.C, have you been able to test the #c43 patch?
As for TLS and alignment, to confirm it is a ld bug, can you try #c29 testcase
with all of gas + gld, gas + sunld and sunas + sunld (or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105135
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Trying to microbenchmark this in a tight loop on i9-7960X shows in this case
cmov probably better (but cmov is really a lottery on x86):
cat pr105135.c
__attribute__((noipa)) char to_lower_1(const char c) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105027
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20f2303b0ce6bbe412e852e6423daabd04c39ebb
commit r11-9773-g20f2303b0ce6bbe412e852e6423daabd04c39ebb
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103650
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0811a4dc39d6269f4087c25ed2be497fe027e756
commit r11-9765-g0811a4dc39d6269f4087c25ed2be497fe027e756
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104098
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6bf63ff3684c28c3b2c4d3a67a42db738d6342d
commit r11-9764-gf6bf63ff3684c28c3b2c4d3a67a42db738d6342d
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104542
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe76adc667b4e521705540b30b68ab988c6abbec
commit r11-9760-gfe76adc667b4e521705540b30b68ab988c6abbec
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104301
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6503952a2f884917b52d0f4ae2707d25f1a0a39
commit r11-9757-ge6503952a2f884917b52d0f4ae2707d25f1a0a39
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105099
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105054
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105142
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> Created attachment 52745 [details]
> avoid combining the conditions
>
> Like this prototype which fixes the testcase and avoids combining from stmts
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105139
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> @Richi: Are you sure about that your GAS supports that?
>
> $ cat vmovw.s
> vmovw %xmm0, %xmm1
> $ as -v --64 vmovw.s
> GNU assembler version 2.38
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105142
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 52745
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52745=edit
avoid combining the conditions
Like this prototype which fixes the testcase and avoids combining from stmts
defined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105144
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:376cf6d19cdcb791a4257bc1cafabfae89227683
commit r12-7981-g376cf6d19cdcb791a4257bc1cafabfae89227683
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105135
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035
Bug 103035 depends on bug 105132, which changed state.
Bug 105132 Summary: ICE in in operator[], at vec.h:889 with
-march=skylake-avx512 -O3 since r12-7246-g4963079769c99c40
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105132
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105132
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105140
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105132
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3eda57b4ae50b5fe57c174556f1daf3bd9a46b09
commit r12-7980-g3eda57b4ae50b5fe57c174556f1daf3bd9a46b09
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105140
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eaaf77dd85c333b116111bb1ae6c080154a4e411
commit r12-7979-geaaf77dd85c333b116111bb1ae6c080154a4e411
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105142
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 52744
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52744=edit
patch to rewrite undefined overflow stmts
Here's the initial patch, not solving the testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105140
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE: |[10/11/12 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105142
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Hmm, I think the error happens earlier already when we simplify
>
> _2 < _16 && (_4 > _2) to _2 < _4
>
> I do have a patch to do the rewrite into defined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105139
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Summary|[12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105142
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I mean ... is equivalent to a < c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105139
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
@Richi: Are you sure about that your GAS supports that?
$ cat vmovw.s
vmovw %xmm0, %xmm1
$ as -v --64 vmovw.s
GNU assembler version 2.38 (x86_64-suse-linux) using BFD version (GNU Binutils;
openSUSE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105142
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If so, that must be still during ifcombine though.
Because what I see is that we have effectively MIN_EXPR +
large_cst> until threadfull1, which decides to thread it based on the
a < c comparison, if a <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104740
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6b786d749812542dae90db1701a3cfdccfa1e4b
commit r12-7978-gf6b786d749812542dae90db1701a3cfdccfa1e4b
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105139
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105132
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105142
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, I think the error happens earlier already when we simplify
_2 < _16 && (_16 + 5713568809962283044 > _2) to _2 < _4
I do have a patch to do the rewrite into defined overflow which definitely
fixes a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105136
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The regression in bar: is due to RA regression for:
(insn 28 27 29 2 (parallel [
(set (reg:SI 89)
(plus:SI (reg:SI 92)
(subreg:SI (reg:DI 87) 0)))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105144
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52743
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52743=edit
gcc12-pr105144-2.patch
And incremental fix for 3).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105132
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
So we end up scheduling
t.ii:4:6: note: node 0x45e58d0 (max_nunits=16, refcnt=1) vector(8)
t.ii:4:6: note: op template: patt_99 = _20 & patt_346;
t.ii:4:6: note: stmt 0 patt_99 = _20 & patt_346;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105144
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52742
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52742=edit
gcc12-pr105144.patch
Fix for 1) and 2).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105144
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105144
Bug ID: 105144
Summary: [12 Regression] Bootstrap + install failure on aarch64
due to aarch64-tune.md likely since r12-7842
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105121
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022, dcb314 at hotmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105121
>
> David Binderman changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105121
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105142
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105140
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105139
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105136
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105134
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105132
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105126
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Priority|P3
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
