[Bug target/105523] Wrong warning array subscript [0] is outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105523 --- Comment #3 from Wilhelm M --- This bug is still in version 13.0.0

[Bug target/105523] Wrong warning array subscript [0] is outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105523 --- Comment #2 from Wilhelm M --- Setting --param=min-pagesize=0 on the commandline does the trick. But I think this should be set generally for avr target

[Bug target/105514] rv64 qsort gets wrong result when '-O2 -DDEBUG'.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105514 --- Comment #2 from chenglulu --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Just looking at the code, there seems to be some aliasing violations going > on which is causing the problem. > > Sometimes accessing via unsigned long and others

[Bug other/105527] New: configure option --with-zstd is not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105527 Bug ID: 105527 Summary: configure option --with-zstd is not documented Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/105526] New: [Coarray] Missing checks for arguments of type TEAM_TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105526 Bug ID: 105526 Summary: [Coarray] Missing checks for arguments of type TEAM_TYPE Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/105501] The statement TYPE IS without a space is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105501 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/105523] Wrong warning array subscript [0] is outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105523 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/105525] some targets don't define __INTPTR_TYPE__ breaking libgcov-driver.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105525 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Those two targets are lacking an appropriate inclusion of one of the *-stdint.h files in their tm_file list in gcc/config.gcc.

[Bug c++/105524] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false-positive with switch of enum with more than 2 elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105524 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/105525] New: some targets don't define __INTPTR_TYPE__ breaking libgcov-driver.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105525 Bug ID: 105525 Summary: some targets don't define __INTPTR_TYPE__ breaking libgcov-driver.c Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/105524] New: -Wmaybe-uninitialized false-positive with switch of enum with more than 2 elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105524 Bug ID: 105524 Summary: -Wmaybe-uninitialized false-positive with switch of enum with more than 2 elements Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/105522] [powerpc-darwin] ICE: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:3059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105522 --- Comment #7 from Sergey Fedorov --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #6) > it seems to fail "forever" (at least back to 5.5) > > minimal reproducer: > > typedef const struct __CFString * CFStringRef; > > static void >

[Bug fortran/105473] semicolon allowed when list-directed read integer with decimal='point'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-05-08

[Bug target/105522] [powerpc-darwin] ICE: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:3059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105522 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- it seems to fail "forever" (at least back to 5.5) minimal reproducer: typedef const struct __CFString * CFStringRef; static void create_usage_match(const unsigned int page, const unsigned int usage, int

[Bug target/105521] missed optimization in modulo arithmetic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105521 --- Comment #3 from Goswin von Brederlow --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > This requires having a, 64bit/32bit (and 128bit/64bit) pattern really. So > this is both a middle-end issue and a target issue. > > Note there might be

[Bug c++/105523] New: Wrong warning array subscript [0] is outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105523 Bug ID: 105523 Summary: Wrong warning array subscript [0] is outside array bounds Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/105522] gcc11: internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:3059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105522 --- Comment #5 from Sergey Fedorov --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > I can repeat this with the 11.3-darwin-r0 release build on powwerpc-darwin9. > > Do you happen to know if this previously worked with GCC 11 and/or earlier, >

[Bug c/86647] Test on constant expression (unsigned) -1 < 0 triggers a spurious -Wtype-limits warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86647 Vincent Mailhol changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mailhol.vincent at wanadoo dot fr

[Bug target/105522] gcc11: internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:3059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105522 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/103722] [12/13 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn building glibc for SH4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103722 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/105522] gcc11: internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:3059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105522 --- Comment #3 from Sergey Fedorov --- Created attachment 52939 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52939=edit save-temps file

[Bug target/105522] gcc11: internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:3059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105522 --- Comment #2 from Sergey Fedorov --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1) > I am not going to be able to make any progress on this without a .i file (it > is not an error that I've seen in any testing). > > > > >

[Bug target/105522] gcc11: internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:3059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105522 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/105522] New: gcc11: internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:3059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105522 Bug ID: 105522 Summary: gcc11: internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:3059 Product: gcc Version: 11.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: