https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105714
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'll have a look...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The warning seems to have started with r11-5391
Before that there was no warning even with -Wsystem-headers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The warning started to be given without -Wsystem-headers with r12-1992
It was already present with -Wsystem-headers, but suppressed by default.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105714
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-24
Summary|ASan in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105378
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105378
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4fb2b4f7ea6b80ae75d3efb6f86e7c6179080535
commit r13-726-g4fb2b4f7ea6b80ae75d3efb6f86e7c6179080535
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105714
Bug ID: 105714
Summary: ASan in gcc trunk missed a buffer-overflow at -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 103865, which changed state.
Bug 103865 Summary: virtual function can have a requires clause
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103865
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105699
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103865
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105699
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||67491
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105713
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105713
Bug ID: 105713
Summary: [gimplefe] need a way to specify TREE_ADDRESSABLE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105711
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105711
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Confirmed. We are expanding
MEM [(char *)] = { 0, 0 };
with 'c' expanded as
(concat:CQI (reg/v:QI 93 [ c ])
(reg/v:QI 94 [ c+1 ]))
doing read_complex_part from
(subreg:CQI (const_vector:V2QI [
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105699
--- Comment #2 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
Another aspect is that the order of destructors in the class change its
behavior:
#include
template
struct X {
~X() requires (N==1);
virtual ~X();
};
// X is NOT polymorphic in GCC
static_assert(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105711
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105712
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, sorry, bad archeology, the pass_post_ipa_warn was indeed added by me and
the rationale for placing it where it is was given in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817#c9
The warning shouldn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105712
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this code is invalid (no diagnostic required; there was some talk about
changing this for C++23 to require a diagnostic) and GCC actually does the
right thing here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105712
Bug ID: 105712
Summary: [13 Regression] Rejected valid code since
r13-76-gdcb4bd0789d13dd4
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Jakub - do you remember why you added the pass at this point, right after
> inlining but before scalar cleanup gets the chance to remove dead code?
Which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105710
--- Comment #6 from Sergey Fedorov ---
> Correct (even if it did exist it would only be for 10.7+) so --enable-tls is
> a configuration error.
>
> (as I have said several times, the idea of configure is to choose the
> correct settings for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105378
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b43836914bdc2a37563cf31359b2c4803bfe4374
commit r13-724-gb43836914bdc2a37563cf31359b2c4803bfe4374
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104964
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #16)
> I think I might have hit the same thing in qt_readlink:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/847145. Martin, did you chase down the Qt issue you
> had?
Yes, for Qt5, one
nk//binary-trunk-r13-723-20220524082011-g1adf11822bd-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20220524 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104482
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105710
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105627
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105708
roc at ocallahan dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roc at ocallahan dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105706
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100221
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105629
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100221
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1adf11822bd48f4d65156b7642514630c08c4d00
commit r13-723-g1adf11822bd48f4d65156b7642514630c08c4d00
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105629
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d918faea1217596877a35c4946500399731fbbd3
commit r13-722-gd918faea1217596877a35c4946500399731fbbd3
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105706
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8fa8bca9f53fcfdedc2b4fa55093dbd1ab7abbd1
commit r13-721-g8fa8bca9f53fcfdedc2b4fa55093dbd1ab7abbd1
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105627
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:149d04ccbb908b3a251485b43faf204752942b9f
commit r13-720-g149d04ccbb908b3a251485b43faf204752942b9f
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105706
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
101 - 139 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
