[Bug target/106460] internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand on -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106460 --- Comment #1 from Jiu Fu Guo --- The ice occur when output rtx "(high:DI (symbol_ref:DI ("var_48")..))) to constant pool. This rtx is generated at function "recog_for_combine"(in combine.cc) after invoking "force_const_mem". This kind of rtx

[Bug rtl-optimization/106460] New: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand on -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106460 Bug ID: 106460 Summary: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand on -O1 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/106459] Compiler crashing for loongarch64-linux-gnu on windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106459 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- It might also be: #define IMM16_OPERAND(VALUE) \ ((unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) (VALUE) + 0x8000 < 0x1)

[Bug target/106459] Compiler crashing for loongarch64-linux-gnu on windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106459 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- I suspect it is this macro which is causing the issue: /* True if VALUE can be loaded into a register using LU12I. */ #define LU12I_OPERAND(VALUE) \ (((VALUE) | ((1UL << 31) - IMM_REACH)) == ((1UL <<

[Bug target/106459] Compiler crashing for loongarch64-linux-gnu on windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106459 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |target --- Comment #3 from Andrew

[Bug c++/106459] Compiler crashing for loongarch64-linux-gnu on windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106459 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |c++ --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- I

[Bug other/106459] Compiler crashing for loongarch64-linux-gnu on windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106459 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- It does not crash on linux host but crash on windows host.

[Bug other/106459] New: Compiler crashing for loongarch64-linux-gnu on windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106459 Bug ID: 106459 Summary: Compiler crashing for loongarch64-linux-gnu on windows Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/106170] [13 Regression] x86_64-w64-mingw32 host GCC with win32 thread model does not provide pthread.h. lto-plugin fails with canadian compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106170 --- Comment #17 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #15) > Feel free to provide Windows implementation of the critical section. case $target in riscv*) # do not use locking as pthread depends on libatomic ;;

[Bug lto/106170] [13 Regression] x86_64-w64-mingw32 host GCC with win32 thread model does not provide pthread.h. lto-plugin fails with canadian compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106170 --- Comment #16 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #15) > Feel free to provide Windows implementation of the critical section. make[4]: Leaving directory

[Bug analyzer/99860] RFE: analyzer does not respect "restrict"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99860 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Quoting Paul Eggert here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2022-07/msg00066.html > I looked into this a bit more, and it turns out that GCC was wrong > about > what happens when some

[Bug c++/106430] [modules] ICE on function result of imported type with user-declared constexpr SMF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106430 Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[modules] ICE on function |[modules] ICE on function

[Bug analyzer/105285] False positive with -Wanalyzer-null-dereference in git.git's reftable/reader.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105285 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/106358] [meta-bug] tracker bug for building the Linux kernel with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106358 Bug 106358 depends on bug 106204, which changed state. Bug 106204 Summary: False positive from -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value with -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106204 What

[Bug analyzer/106204] False positive from -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value with -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106204 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug analyzer/106358] [meta-bug] tracker bug for building the Linux kernel with -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106358 Bug 106358 depends on bug 106225, which changed state. Bug 106225 Summary: False positives from -Wanalyzer-tainted-divisor https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106225 What|Removed |Added

[Bug analyzer/106225] False positives from -Wanalyzer-tainted-divisor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106225 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug analyzer/106225] False positives from -Wanalyzer-tainted-divisor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106225 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71a4f739c218746df70612eeb844024d1fe206bb commit r12-8638-g71a4f739c218746df70612eeb844024d1fe206bb Author: David Malcolm

[Bug analyzer/106204] False positive from -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value with -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106204 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09cb9c88ef8e2c0c89ada9cde2caf1a960db7a77 commit r12-8637-g09cb9c88ef8e2c0c89ada9cde2caf1a960db7a77 Author: David Malcolm

[Bug analyzer/105285] False positive with -Wanalyzer-null-dereference in git.git's reftable/reader.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105285 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05530fcea07a9ee5c7501867f3f11f0fbc504a06 commit r12-8632-g05530fcea07a9ee5c7501867f3f11f0fbc504a06 Author: David Malcolm

[Bug analyzer/105285] False positive with -Wanalyzer-null-dereference in git.git's reftable/reader.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105285 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1321183a13540b5c3503586b94c758198471c7b3 commit r12-8631-g1321183a13540b5c3503586b94c758198471c7b3 Author: David Malcolm

[Bug c++/105842] rejects-valid: static member function overload set constrained by concepts for class template results in ambiguous call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105842 --- Comment #6 from Joe Loser --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #5) > Fixed for GCC 12.2/13 Thanks for the fix, Patrick!

[Bug c/106416] -Wint-conversion should be an error, not a pedwarn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106416 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/106458] [12 Regression] glibc's malloc/tst-scratch_buffer.c test is miscompiled with gcc-12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106458 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 53366 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53366=edit .s file generated with gcc-12

[Bug target/106458] [12 Regression] glibc's malloc/tst-scratch_buffer.c test is miscompiled with gcc-12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106458 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 53365 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53365=edit .s file generated with gcc-11

[Bug target/106458] [12 Regression] glibc's malloc/tst-scratch_buffer.c test is miscompiled with gcc-12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106458 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 53364 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53364=edit .i file

[Bug target/106458] New: [12 Regression] glibc's malloc/tst-scratch_buffer.c test is miscompiled with gcc-12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106458 Bug ID: 106458 Summary: [12 Regression] glibc's malloc/tst-scratch_buffer.c test is miscompiled with gcc-12 Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/106457] New: array_at_struct_end_p returns TRUE for a two-dimension array which is not inside any structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106457 Bug ID: 106457 Summary: array_at_struct_end_p returns TRUE for a two-dimension array which is not inside any structure Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/106415] loop-ivopts prevents correct usage of dbra with 16-bit loop counters on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106415 --- Comment #6 from Undefined Opcode --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #5) > At the top of tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.cc file, there are some useful comments > describing the costs for iv candidate itself and group, it may help. > > : > cand

[Bug target/100340] Bootstrap fails with Clang 12.0.5 (XCode 12.5)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100340 --- Comment #37 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #36) > Note that the solution to this has caused downstream MacPorts bug 65236: > https://trac.macports.org/ticket/65236 the macports ticket does not contain enough

[Bug analyzer/106298] RFE: analyzer handling of dup, dup2, and dup3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106298 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-07-27 Assignee|dmalcolm

[Bug target/100340] Bootstrap fails with Clang 12.0.5 (XCode 12.5)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100340 --- Comment #36 from Eric Gallager --- Note that the solution to this has caused downstream MacPorts bug 65236: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/65236

[Bug c++/46476] Missing Warning about unreachable code after return [-Wunreachable-code-return]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46476 --- Comment #30 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 106456 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/106456] -Wunreachable-code seems very broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106456 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug c/106456] -Wunreachable-code seems very broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106456 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Wunreachable-code Common Ignore Warning Does nothing. Preserved for backward compatibility.

[Bug c++/106448] [OpenMP] atomic compare – g++ wrongly accepts parenthesized condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106448 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > is incorrectly accepted in C and rejected in C++. I mean is correctly rejected in C++.

[Bug c++/106448] [OpenMP] atomic compare – g++ wrongly accepts parenthesized condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106448 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- int x; void bar (void) { #pragma omp atomic x = (x + 6); #pragma omp atomic x = (x * 6); } is incorrectly accepted in C and rejected in C++.

[Bug c/91093] Error on implicit int by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093 --- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer --- It seems that auto x = 1.0; will change meaning in C2X (as implemented by GCC) and use type double instead of int for x. We are probably way too late to fix this (by rejecting the construct in earlier

[Bug c/106416] -Wint-conversion should be an error, not a pedwarn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106416 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/106449] ICE in #pragma omp parallel for simd since r6-4544-ge01d41e553aae245

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106449 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus --- Comment on attachment 53362 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53362 gcc13-pr106449.patch The code does not seem to work. If I add: void foobar(int *a, int*b) {

[Bug c/106455] bad style: comparatives over booleans ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106455 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- bool > bool is evaluated as (int)bool > (int)bool.

[Bug c/106455] bad style: comparatives over booleans ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106455 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > bool > bool works just fine and is exactly what we want to test here. Confused. So is false > true or true > false ?

[Bug c/106455] bad style: comparatives over booleans ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106455 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- negative && !other_negative is definitely easier to understand than negative > other_negative. In fact, given the condition negative != other_negative, negative already implies !other_negative, so this

[Bug c/106455] bad style: comparatives over booleans ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106455 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/106449] ICE in #pragma omp parallel for simd since r6-4544-ge01d41e553aae245

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106449 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus --- Comment on attachment 53362 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53362 gcc13-pr106449.patch > + t = fold_convert (sizetype, fd->loops[i + 1].n1); > + t =

[Bug c/106456] New: -Wunreachable-code seems very broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106456 Bug ID: 106456 Summary: -Wunreachable-code seems very broken Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/106455] New: bad style: comparatives over booleans ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106455 Bug ID: 106455 Summary: bad style: comparatives over booleans ? Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug middle-end/106449] ICE in #pragma omp parallel for simd since r6-4544-ge01d41e553aae245

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106449 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 53362 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53362=edit gcc13-pr106449.patch Untested fix.

[Bug analyzer/106003] RFE: -fanalyzer could complain about misuse of file-descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106003 Bug 106003 depends on bug 106286, which changed state. Bug 106286 Summary: fd_diagnostic should implement get_meaning_for_state_change vfunc https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106286 What|Removed

[Bug analyzer/106286] fd_diagnostic should implement get_meaning_for_state_change vfunc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106286 Immad Mir changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mir at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug analyzer/106286] fd_diagnostic should implement get_meaning_for_state_change vfunc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106286 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Immad Mir : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f82c0ea8d86ee3bb404c460a04ff2ccfb56d2a0 commit r13-1860-g0f82c0ea8d86ee3bb404c460a04ff2ccfb56d2a0 Author: Immad Mir Date: Wed Jul

[Bug rtl-optimization/106419] ICE in lra_assign, at lra-assigns.cc:1649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106419 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #9) > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8) > > So for which pseudo and which hard register did this ICE, and what did the > > code look like at that

[Bug rtl-optimization/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 --- Comment #47 from Richard Earnshaw --- Created attachment 53361 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53361=edit Possible patch A slightly more thorough attempt to avoid the problem by detecting when the alias sets are known

[Bug analyzer/106454] -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when returning heap-allocation through array in struct after function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106454 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- ...i.e. it's getting confused about liveness. It's considering that the call to c could have overwritten the old value of d with a new value (or d->args), and thus that this hypothetical new value of

[Bug analyzer/106454] -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when returning heap-allocation through array in struct after function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106454 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/106449] ICE in #pragma omp parallel for simd since r6-4544-ge01d41e553aae245

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106449 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/106450] [13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2860 (error: could not split insn) since r13-1607-gc3ed9e0d6e96d869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106450 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/106449] ICE in #pragma omp parallel for simd since r6-4544-ge01d41e553aae245

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106449 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- void foo (void) { int a[1024]; int *p, *q; #pragma omp simd collapse(2) for (p = [0]; p < [512]; p++) for (q = p + 64; q < p + 128; q++) ; } is enough to reproduce it.

[Bug debug/106261] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in output_call_frame_info, at dwarf2out.cc:943

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106261 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE

[Bug middle-end/106332] Possible out of bound buffer access in opts-common.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106332 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/106454] New: -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when returning heap-allocation through array in struct after function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106454 Bug ID: 106454 Summary: -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when returning heap-allocation through array in struct after function call Product: gcc Version:

[Bug tree-optimization/94920] Failure to optimize abs pattern from arithmetic with selected operands based on comparisons with 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94920 --- Comment #4 from Gabriel Ravier --- So, is this fully fixed, or did I miss something ?

[Bug debug/106261] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in output_call_frame_info, at dwarf2out.cc:943

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106261 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f9671b60f9395cb1dca128b92f5dd215f5aeaae1 commit r13-1856-gf9671b60f9395cb1dca128b92f5dd215f5aeaae1 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug middle-end/106332] Possible out of bound buffer access in opts-common.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106332 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc078cf85295ec5d0a63a16afbd045efac0d455e commit r13-1855-gcc078cf85295ec5d0a63a16afbd045efac0d455e Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/94920] Failure to optimize abs pattern from arithmetic with selected operands based on comparisons with 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94920 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0bc1566dec0cab9410723c96d2ef3280fdab8e8e commit r13-1854-g0bc1566dec0cab9410723c96d2ef3280fdab8e8e Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/106397] [13 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:645 since r13-1450-gd2a898666609452e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106397 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3044a7a824981496875acc6debf467fb904c55f2 commit r13-1853-g3044a7a824981496875acc6debf467fb904c55f2 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/106453] New: Redundant zero extension after crc32q

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106453 Bug ID: 106453 Summary: Redundant zero extension after crc32q Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug libstdc++/106452] New: Iteration of filesystem::path("//") results in path("//") and not path("/")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106452 Bug ID: 106452 Summary: Iteration of filesystem::path("//") results in path("//") and not path("/") Product: gcc Version: 12.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug lto/106129] [12 Regression] LTO option merging broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106129 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.1.1, 13.0 Status|NEW

[Bug lto/106129] [12 Regression] LTO option merging broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106129 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2892faac6d760ebc47f8f6ebee51e5cf6255cc8 commit r12-8628-gd2892faac6d760ebc47f8f6ebee51e5cf6255cc8 Author: Joseph Myers

[Bug tree-optimization/106087] [12 Regression] ICE with inline-asm with multiple output and assigned only static vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106087 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/106063] [12 Regression] ICE: in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:281 with -O2 -fno-tree-forwprop --param=evrp-mode=legacy-first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106063 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/106063] [12 Regression] ICE: in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:281 with -O2 -fno-tree-forwprop --param=evrp-mode=legacy-first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106063 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:019a9ef7f7466c0f41bdc8c5838f4f4926c938aa commit r12-8626-g019a9ef7f7466c0f41bdc8c5838f4f4926c938aa Author: Dimitar

[Bug tree-optimization/105665] [12 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-397-gda9e6e63d1ae22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105665 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.1.0 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/106189] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception since r9-1948-gd893b683f40884cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106189 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b8458bc35b5df34c1b4b8735975f2686444f6c8 commit r12-8629-g5b8458bc35b5df34c1b4b8735975f2686444f6c8 Author: Richard

[Bug middle-end/100810] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-397-gda9e6e63d1ae22e530ec7baf59f6ed028bf05776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100810 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ca164a6372412a1b3dc62b6fbde77d338e22bd4 commit r12-8624-g4ca164a6372412a1b3dc62b6fbde77d338e22bd4 Author: Alexandre

[Bug tree-optimization/106087] [12 Regression] ICE with inline-asm with multiple output and assigned only static vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106087 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0e388998b797da09a8c018f6f94d1358fd4b8f1 commit r12-8627-ge0e388998b797da09a8c018f6f94d1358fd4b8f1 Author: Andrew

[Bug tree-optimization/106063] [12 Regression] ICE: in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:281 with -O2 -fno-tree-forwprop --param=evrp-mode=legacy-first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106063 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13d23c313374e15186f33fa6d57a0c9fd5d8b486 commit r12-8625-g13d23c313374e15186f33fa6d57a0c9fd5d8b486 Author: Tamar

[Bug tree-optimization/105665] [12 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-397-gda9e6e63d1ae22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105665 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ca164a6372412a1b3dc62b6fbde77d338e22bd4 commit r12-8624-g4ca164a6372412a1b3dc62b6fbde77d338e22bd4 Author: Alexandre

[Bug target/106346] [11/12/13 Regression] Potential regression on vectorization of left shift with constants since r11-5160-g9fc9573f9a5e94

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106346 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 27 Jul 2022, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106346 > > --- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug middle-end/106449] ICE in #pragma omp parallel for simd since r6-4544-ge01d41e553aae245

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106449 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/106450] [13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.cc:2860 (error: could not split insn) since r13-1607-gc3ed9e0d6e96d869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106450 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/106446] -Warray-bounds false positive on downcast under condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106446 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/106346] [11/12/13 Regression] Potential regression on vectorization of left shift with constants since r11-5160-g9fc9573f9a5e94

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106346 --- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #4) > > I believe the problem is actually g:27842e2a1eb26a7eae80b8efd98fb8c8bd74a68e > > > > We added an optab for

[Bug c++/106434] [12/13 Regression] Spurious -Wnull-dereference when using std::unique_copy() since r12-5187-g1ae8edf5f73ca5c3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106434 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Spurious -Wnull-dereference |[12/13 Regression] Spurious

[Bug target/106346] [11/12/13 Regression] Potential regression on vectorization of left shift with constants since r11-5160-g9fc9573f9a5e94

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106346 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #4) > I believe the problem is actually g:27842e2a1eb26a7eae80b8efd98fb8c8bd74a68e > > We added an optab for the widening left shift pattern there however the >

[Bug target/106346] [11/12/13 Regression] Potential regression on vectorization of left shift with constants since r11-5160-g9fc9573f9a5e94

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106346 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Potential regression on |[11/12/13 Regression]

[Bug target/106022] [12 Regression] Enable vectorizer generates extra load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106022 --- Comment #20 from Richard Biener --- Probably OK to backport for 12.2 (but no later)

[Bug rtl-optimization/101347] [11/12 Regression] ICE in cfg_layout_initialize with __builtin_setjmp and -fprofile-generate -fprofile-use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101347 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.0 Status|NEW

[Bug other/106451] [13 regression] gcc.dg/pr56837.c fails after r13-1762-gf9d4c3b45c5ed5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106451 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/106375] [13 regreesion] Lowering complex type mov regressed loop distribution for memset/memcpy/memmov.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106375 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/106449] ICE in #pragma omp parallel for simd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106449 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1) > My impression is that the ICE is due to having > fold_build2_loc (0, PLUS_EXPR, type, op0, op1) > with > (gdb) p debug_tree(type) > (gdb) p debug_tree(op0)

[Bug middle-end/102633] [11/12/13 Regression] warning for self-initialization despite -Wno-init-self

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102633 --- Comment #7 from Martin Uecker --- Sorry, somehow I missed this. I will look at this once I am back from travel (if Marek hasen't fixed it)