https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106909
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #53563|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106345
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5cb02a5f803d522cfdc8a517ae9afef4d65353f8
commit r11-10253-g5cb02a5f803d522cfdc8a517ae9afef4d65353f8
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106345
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19e217a2b9d08508203b6e645b67ab63b17af5f8
commit r12-8761-g19e217a2b9d08508203b6e645b67ab63b17af5f8
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106905
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #2)
> It also can be reproduced for x86_64 when compiling the following testcase,
> reduced from gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr103144-mul-2.c, w/
> -march=silvermont
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106905
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
in vectorizable_nonlinear_induction, we prevent variable peeling by only
checking LOOP_VINFO_MASK_SKIP_NITERS (loop_vinfo).
But when "!vect_use_loop_mask_for_alignment_p (loop_vinfo) &&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106905
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20220912 on s390x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101906
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101906
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3ba0eaaa223f7b8208d279e3f39ff134912f9e9
commit r13-2633-gc3ba0eaaa223f7b8208d279e3f39ff134912f9e9
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106918
Bug ID: 106918
Summary: Cannot use structure constructor with component
allocatable character array of deferred length
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93259
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f37a44483870e0db8cd6437ae9716cbe28b7f59
commit r12-8759-g8f37a44483870e0db8cd6437ae9716cbe28b7f59
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90451
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:999638cb7b126d33d1ea6548c69ba387b7d7a270
commit r12-8758-g999638cb7b126d33d1ea6548c69ba387b7d7a270
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106893
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:999638cb7b126d33d1ea6548c69ba387b7d7a270
commit r12-8758-g999638cb7b126d33d1ea6548c69ba387b7d7a270
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91092
--- Comment #21 from Sam James ---
Followers of this bug may be interested to learn:
1. Clang has made this change in LLVM 15 (as well as some other related
changes:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106897
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106909
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-09-12
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90451
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03381beccb52c0e2c15da3b8b8dfa3bb6eb71df9
commit r13-2632-g03381beccb52c0e2c15da3b8b8dfa3bb6eb71df9
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106893
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03381beccb52c0e2c15da3b8b8dfa3bb6eb71df9
commit r13-2632-g03381beccb52c0e2c15da3b8b8dfa3bb6eb71df9
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93259
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6bcca5f642eb950a3cef024ea49a35e4792306f6
commit r13-2631-g6bcca5f642eb950a3cef024ea49a35e4792306f6
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106915
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-09-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106915
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106916
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106914
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106913
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-09-12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106912
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106756
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 Regression] Overbroad |[CWG1699] Overbroad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106320
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106320
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f323610375f4f87098f98b501ab01d033c930558
commit r12-8757-gf323610375f4f87098f98b501ab01d033c930558
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106320
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db19cfdac8ede93172aecc58612171c239c993ad
commit r13-2629-gdb19cfdac8ede93172aecc58612171c239c993ad
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106909
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 53566
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53566=edit
C++ source code
After an hour of reduction, this is what remains.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106917
Bug ID: 106917
Summary: modula-2 fails to bootstrap with the modula-2 branch
,20220912
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106916
Bug ID: 106916
Summary: ICE/segfault during parsing with modules and invalid
code in gfc_free_namespace when using the same symbol
twice
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106567
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c989a8ed47228bdd494a2f0d1f6fdd325f953d7
commit r13-2628-g7c989a8ed47228bdd494a2f0d1f6fdd325f953d7
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106651
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101322
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15ae5487dfd3f437b47a26d6198c8e1257fec2fc
commit r11-10251-g15ae5487dfd3f437b47a26d6198c8e1257fec2fc
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106915
Bug ID: 106915
Summary: ICE/segfault during parsing with modules and invalid
code in malloc
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106893
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106914
Bug ID: 106914
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:889
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106913
Bug ID: 106913
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in dump_bb_info, at cfg.cc:796
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106912
Bug ID: 106912
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_loops, at
tree-vectorizer.cc:1032
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106911
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106911
Bug ID: 106911
Summary: ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at
fortran/simplify.cc:193
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106868
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
...
Actually, scratch that, sorry. Richard is right that the false positive is due
to a bug in the warning code. The following patch resolves it:
diff --git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106567
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
is not vectorizable.
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20220912/include/c++/13.0.0/cmath:261:28:
missed: not vectorized: relevant stmt not supported: _9 = __builtin_floorf
(_1);
While on aarch64, GCC can handle the SLP just fine:
vect__1.7_12 = MEM [(float *)r_4(D)];
vect__9.8_13 = .FLOOR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106868
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Confirmed.
>
> [local count: 1073741824]:
> alloc ();
> q.0_1 = q;
> *p_4(D) = q.0_1;
> q ={v} {CLOBBER(eol)};
> a_8 = __builtin_memcpy (q.0_1, "", 1);
> *a_8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106910
Bug ID: 106910
Summary: roundss not vectorized
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86491
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ef5fa4c56c82dfbd6e8fc5e4e08c4be843abc3e
commit r13-2627-g8ef5fa4c56c82dfbd6e8fc5e4e08c4be843abc3e
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106909
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|12.0|13.0
Summary|error: control
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106909
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Git range seems to be cdcc27c1ca9c485c..a0f83501182de68f, some 30 commits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106909
Bug ID: 106909
Summary: error: control flow in the middle of basic block
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106908
--- Comment #2 from ralphengels at gmail dot com
---
ah my bad then i just thought it looked suspicious especially since i been
having problems building gnat. For some reason it tries to link to the static
libgcc library and aborts due to an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106908
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106896
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
I think you may want to use something like:
bb->count.probability_in (ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun)->count).to_sreal()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106896
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106902
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] |[11/12 Regression] Program
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106902
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106908
Bug ID: 106908
Summary: libsupc++ wrong declaration of __unexpected_handler
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106906
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, it is correct as is, because while icv_addr[3] and params[3] have void *
type, they are actually cast to various types (either other pointers or bool
etc.).
But there is no need not to make the cast
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106907
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
Should probably be written as swapped != !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106896
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106907
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
In the same file rs6000.cc, cppcheck produces:
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc:28477:8: style: Same expression on both sides of
'&&'. [duplicateExpression]
Source code is
info->all_words_same
=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106907
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Wrong source code. It should be:
if (swapped ^ !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN
&& icode != CODE_FOR_vsx_xxpermdi_v16qi)
That looks like it could benefit from some ( and ).
The source code I did
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106907
Bug ID: 106907
Summary: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc:23155: strange expression
?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106906
Bug ID: 106906
Summary: libgomp/env.c: 3 * boolean value assigned to pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106905
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105329
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:723ef5a937dbab5e7a35761fd7f0ff0c76849340
commit r13-2618-g723ef5a937dbab5e7a35761fd7f0ff0c76849340
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106894
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106905
Bug ID: 106905
Summary: [13 Regression] ia64: ICE in in
vect_peel_nonlinear_iv_init, at tree-vect-loop.cc:8412
on zstd-1.5.2
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106894
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:994ea892bd02dd8a1c04875ad3553c57939c3abf
commit r13-2617-g994ea892bd02dd8a1c04875ad3553c57939c3abf
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106902
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106901
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Summary|False
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 106901, which changed state.
Bug 106901 Summary: [13 Regression] False positive -Warray-bounds with -O2 or
higher?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106901
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106892
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
> Shouldn't that be 106892?
Right, I at least fixed ChangeLog entry in
g:3fa66b95570a125fd35d5721c9eb08d975f73e82.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106899
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
The resource issue is probably a non-issue these days
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106896
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fweimer at redhat dot com
--- Comment
78 matches
Mail list logo
