https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106939
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Vakhrushev ---
Thanks a lot, Andrew! Totally my bad. Well, comparison seems to work too:
extern char _src[], _dst[], _end[]; // Defined by the linker
int main(void) {
char *src = &_src[0];
char *dst =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106939
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106939
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Vakhrushev ---
Thanks for the quick reply! I've read the aforementioned comments, but can't
get to see any similarities. May I ask you to recap what needs to be done in
plain and simple words or direct me to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77964
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||neoxic at icloud dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106939
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106939
Bug ID: 106939
Summary: Linker-defined symbols are stained due to 'array
subscript is partly outside array bounds' warning
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106938
Bug ID: 106938
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in
predicate::init_from_control_deps
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96072
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha ---
They still ICE for me.
% powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu-gcc-13.0.0 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu-gcc-13.0.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106928
--- Comment #3 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> I think you missed -fno-finite-math-only option as documented here:
> https://www.spec.org/cpu2017/Docs/benchmarks/500.perlbench_r.html#portability
Thanks! It pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100645
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97361
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97361
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101322
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101322
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8301b8e84d833467b435b33592e0aa599d2db582
commit r10-10983-g8301b8e84d833467b435b33592e0aa599d2db582
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96072
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106932
--- Comment #6 from Tom Allen ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> (In reply to Tom Allen from comment #4)
> > If this is the case, then when I have subdirectories which I explicitly do
> > not want to copy, but files at the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106932
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106936
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
This assert was put here to make sure that the legacy get_value_range() wasn't
being called on stuff that legacy couldn't handle (floats, etc), because the
result would ultimately be copied into a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106932
--- Comment #4 from Tom Allen ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> I think this is the correct behaviour according to the standard.
>
> Where f is status("source") and t is status("dest").
>
> Effects are then as follows:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106567
--- Comment #7 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Since this is a 13 regression, we can close this, right? There's no backports
needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106747
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106903
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106934
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106936
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-09-13
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106747
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23605c6a4eef5ca8ecb64d7006b60aeed241c29c
commit r12-8763-g23605c6a4eef5ca8ecb64d7006b60aeed241c29c
Author: Ian Lance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106937
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-09-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106935
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106931
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106934
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106932
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Tom Allen from comment #0)
> This appears to be contrary to bullet 4.7.4 in Section 29.11.14.3 of the
> C++20 spec, where for regular files in a source directory, the effect should
> be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106932
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this is the correct behaviour according to the standard.
Where f is status("source") and t is status("dest").
Effects are then as follows:
- If f.type() or t.type() is an implementation-defined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106936
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106935
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106937
Bug ID: 106937
Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected
identifier_node, have tree_list in pp_tree_identifier,
at tree-pretty-print.cc:4606
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106936
Bug ID: 106936
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in get_value_range, at
value-query.cc:170
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106935
Bug ID: 106935
Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE in
redirect_call_stmt_to_callee, at cgraph.cc:1505
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106934
Bug ID: 106934
Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100799
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
What is the exact command line (and relevant configuration!) required to
reproduce this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106933
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106931
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-09-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105587
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035
Bug 103035 depends on bug 105587, which changed state.
Bug 105587 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791
(error: unrecognizable insn) since r13-210-gfcda0efccad41eba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105587
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105587
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106877
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff85f0afc7d5684378944f88a9bc9b931034788b
commit r13-2653-gff85f0afc7d5684378944f88a9bc9b931034788b
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84683
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff85f0afc7d5684378944f88a9bc9b931034788b
commit r13-2653-gff85f0afc7d5684378944f88a9bc9b931034788b
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106933
Bug ID: 106933
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791
(error: unrecognizable insn)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106932
--- Comment #1 from Tom Allen ---
Created attachment 53573
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53573=edit
Preprocessor output for minimal testcase reproducing this issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106932
Bug ID: 106932
Summary: Incorrect behavior of std::filesystem::copy() with
overwrite_existing or update_existing options
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106931
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106931
Bug ID: 106931
Summary: -Wstringop-overflow false positive
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106906
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106906
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e11babbfac21163118b69dd25b468ade80dbe8de
commit r13-2652-ge11babbfac21163118b69dd25b468ade80dbe8de
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 106920, which changed state.
Bug 106920 Summary: -Warray-bound false positive regression with -O2 or -Os and
constant address
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106920
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106920
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105762
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||npfhrotynz-ptnqh.myvf@noclu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106536
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106751
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106895
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106904
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.3
Summary|Incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106926
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106929
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106929
--- Comment #4 from Michael Zimmermann ---
Interesting, but IMO it should still fail if you specify an older C standard
e.g. using `-std=c89`, but currently it doesn't.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106929
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106929
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For C17 (and previous standards), if you use -pedantic you'll get a warning,
and -pedantic-errors will make it an error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106929
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This changed with r11-4813 and is intentional:
C Parser: Implement mixing of labels and code.
Implement mixing of labels and code as adopted for C2X
and process some std-attributes on labels.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106930
Bug ID: 106930
Summary: No __ILP32__ preprocessor macro defined on ARM (32bit)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106929
Bug ID: 106929
Summary: declaration in switch-case doesn't fail since GCC 11
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106928
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106925
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|internal compiler error:|[12/13 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106928
--- Comment #1 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
The out.mis file:
3258: # of abstol errors: 0
Minimum abstol: nan
^
3259: Maximum reltol: 0.0e+00
# of abstol errors: 0
^
3260: # of reltol errors: 0
Maximum reltol:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106558
--- Comment #13 from Yuri Gribov ---
Posted to gcc-patches:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601041.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106928
Bug ID: 106928
Summary: 500.perlbench_r fail(VE) since r13-1933
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106927
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106927
--- Comment #1 from Boris Faure ---
The code is indeed incorrect.
It should be:
#include
int main (void)
{
char s[] = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz012345";
size_t d = strlen(s);
__builtin_memmove(s, s + 1, d - 1);
return 0;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93575
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
seeking confirmation that this is fixed and can be closed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106651
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #53565|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106927
Bug ID: 106927
Summary: false-positive -Werror=restrict warnings for memmove
(calling memcpy) within array
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106923
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106926
Bug ID: 106926
Summary: string_view construction from literal string
containing null/zero should warn
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106925
Bug ID: 106925
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106923
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 Regression] ICE in |[13 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106921
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106919
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-09-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106917
--- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley ---
please can I have a copy of the configure and make command?
I've tried:
../gcc-git-devel-modula2/configure --enable-languages=m2
--prefix=/home/gaius/opt --libexecdir=/home/gaius/opt/lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104482
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38db48346cc045ed5656233c42d01d6d06bffc35
commit r13-2643-g38db48346cc045ed5656233c42d01d6d06bffc35
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105485
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94504c9ae157db937a2e62d533a36d56598f3c09
commit r13-2642-g94504c9ae157db937a2e62d533a36d56598f3c09
Author: Kewen.Lin
Date: Tue Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106794
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106924
Bug ID: 106924
Summary: Nested class: virtual function returns wrong pointer
of covariant type
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106877
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106923
Bug ID: 106923
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in eliminate_unnecessary_stmts, at
tree-ssa-dce.cc:1512
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106921
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.3.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106922
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106913
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106913
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad08894ea02b6308c4ed4e8cd8e6a564c2f581e8
commit r13-2639-gad08894ea02b6308c4ed4e8cd8e6a564c2f581e8
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106909
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106909
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c867232df70d3de304714906b4198ecb262eb32
commit r13-2640-g2c867232df70d3de304714906b4198ecb262eb32
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106912
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 53569
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53569=edit
gcc13-pr106878-4.patch
So, I've tried to restrict the verifiers so that they allow pointer arguments
only for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106922
Bug ID: 106922
Summary: [12 Regression] Bogus uninitialized warning on
boost::optional<>>
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106443
--- Comment #4 from Gaius Mulley ---
just querying whether this bug can be closed now?
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
