https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Rich Felker from comment #1)
> There's also a potentially related test case at
> https://godbolt.org/z/jfv1Ge6v4 - I'm not yet clear on whether it's likely
> to have the same root cause.
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.1.2, 4.4.7, 4.5.3
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Confirmed. I don't think it is exactly TBAA which is causing the issue but
rather the way PRE does aliasing walks.
Take:
```
static inline void set_longish(int is_long, void *p, long x)
{
if (is_long)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107108
Bug ID: 107108
Summary: Uncontrolled stack recursion in rust-demangler.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107
--- Comment #1 from Rich Felker ---
There's also a potentially related test case at https://godbolt.org/z/jfv1Ge6v4
- I'm not yet clear on whether it's likely to have the same root cause.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107106
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91669
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106815
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Palmer Dabbelt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75c0899493cd84e64bd30210e848d0d1e9979494
commit r13-3000-g75c0899493cd84e64bd30210e848d0d1e9979494
Author: Palmer Dabbelt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107
Bug ID: 107107
Summary: Wrong codegen from TBAA when stores to distinct
same-mode types are collapsed?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102312
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102334
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 82868, which changed state.
Bug 82868 Summary: ICE in generate_coarray_sym_init, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:5203
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82868
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82868
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107054
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107054
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2bd7622721c3a35a9884135e719ae6b0fdc3e2d
commit r10-11013-gb2bd7622721c3a35a9884135e719ae6b0fdc3e2d
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82868
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2509f6195869fd01aec02714af2d0c3346fa917
commit r10-11012-gf2509f6195869fd01aec02714af2d0c3346fa917
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106985
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12cd4a7c465b1a0874f5bc4419bd19d8041a8e2a
commit r10-11011-g12cd4a7c465b1a0874f5bc4419bd19d8041a8e2a
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107054
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4f53f59aaa208f6c7aff0a8b4fb1950b1dc75a0
commit r11-10284-gc4f53f59aaa208f6c7aff0a8b4fb1950b1dc75a0
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103694
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c59d1e73a617277fea13e785bb0e3f8c1df6ffc4
commit r10-11010-gc59d1e73a617277fea13e785bb0e3f8c1df6ffc4
Author: Harald
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82868
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a24700c64cabd99802a77ab13080d6f66ee0be7
commit r11-10283-g8a24700c64cabd99802a77ab13080d6f66ee0be7
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106985
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a4fff071ff48d699b1af94b88f8878da006c770
commit r11-10282-g0a4fff071ff48d699b1af94b88f8878da006c770
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103694
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a552015b9c4b2e029a47f44f1866578e3af5bd0
commit r11-10281-g6a552015b9c4b2e029a47f44f1866578e3af5bd0
Author: Harald
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107000
--- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 07:46:24PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107000
>
> --- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Mikael
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107080
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61786edf7a82ffb4979207b43a8204ebc2a7671d
commit r13-2995-g61786edf7a82ffb4979207b43a8204ebc2a7671d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107000
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #13)
> If we pass this check, we proceed to reduce_binary, where if one (or both)
> of the operands is an array, we do numerical evaluation for every
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107105
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107106
Bug ID: 107106
Summary: Incorrect use of uninitialized value warning
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107105
Bug ID: 107105
Summary: Consider folding `__and_`, `__or_`, and `__not_` at
the front-end level
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69543
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69543
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b52b99b62df8fc9b3a3010cb0a8cf49bc35037f0
commit r13-2994-gb52b99b62df8fc9b3a3010cb0a8cf49bc35037f0
Author: Lewis Hyatt
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107080
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e564021e4c225420cd8986e9a7a42efe741f92d1
commit r13-2993-ge564021e4c225420cd8986e9a7a42efe741f92d1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107071
--- Comment #9 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
OK so there are three things tested here:
- underflow mode
- rounding mode
- trapping mode
For glibc targets, underflow control is only marked as supported for the float
and double types on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105329
--- Comment #25 from Dan Stahlke ---
The test case I just posted appears in the bug 105651 discussion. So maybe or
maybe not related to the present discussion.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105329
Dan Stahlke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dan at stahlke dot org
--- Comment #24
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107104
Bug ID: 107104
Summary: semantics of __builtin_constant_p within static_assert
and return value
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107080
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107080
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6d8c61a498e9daa1bc7fe419055ae44ad8289cc
commit r13-2992-ga6d8c61a498e9daa1bc7fe419055ae44ad8289cc
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107103
Bug ID: 107103
Summary: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -mcpu=power4 -O1
-fschedule-insns -funroll-all-loops
-fno-sched-pressure --param max-sched-ready-insns=1
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107102
Bug ID: 107102
Summary: SVE function fails to realize it doesn't need the
frame-pointer in the tail call.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107101
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
This also affects when compiling with `-nostdinc`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107101
Bug ID: 107101
Summary: d: Add stub for object module when libphobos is not
compiled, or supported
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107100
--- Comment #1 from Eric Blake ---
Might be a dup of bug#101648
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107083
Alexander Lelyakin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexander.lelyakin@googlema
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107100
Bug ID: 107100
Summary: -fanalyzer false positive about leak in function with
attribute((malloc)) obtained from another function
with attribute((malloc(free,1)))
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107099
Bug ID: 107099
Summary: uncprop a bit
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107098
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107098
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 regression] failure in |[13 regression] failure in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107098
Bug ID: 107098
Summary: [13 regression] failure in 453.povray
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107097
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-09-30
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107097
Bug ID: 107097
Summary: Implement floating point excess precision in C++
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107096
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
See the comment above rgroup_controls in tree-vectorizer.h for the
current assumptions around loop predication. If AVX512 wants something
different then some extensions will be needed :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107000
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107071
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #7)
> @Richard The test in gfortran.dg/ieee/modes_1.f90 is not doing that. It is
> checking that the floating-point modes (rounding mode, underflow mode,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99888
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99889
Bug 99889 depends on bug 99888, which changed state.
Bug 99888 Summary: Add powerpc ELFv2 support for -fpatchable-function-entry*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99888
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99888
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||giuliano.belinassi at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105649
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107096
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106516
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99888
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c23b5006d3ffeda1a9edf5fd817765a6da3696ca
commit r13-2984-gc23b5006d3ffeda1a9edf5fd817765a6da3696ca
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Fri Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105649
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c23b5006d3ffeda1a9edf5fd817765a6da3696ca
commit r13-2984-gc23b5006d3ffeda1a9edf5fd817765a6da3696ca
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Fri Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106516
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c28957176dc0adff6e4b8fcbe6b91f5b82900563
commit r13-2983-gc28957176dc0adff6e4b8fcbe6b91f5b82900563
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Fri Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107088
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Stubbs ---
I can confirm that the patch fixes the amdgcn build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107094
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107088
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus from comment #6)
> I did a quick test using
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cselib.cc b/gcc/cselib.cc
> index 9b582e5d3d6..2fd0190bc79 100644
> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107088
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ia64-*-*|ia64-*-*, amdgcn-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107095
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107095
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44510e44e717d9c05b0c5d197a73676a9427e32f
commit r13-2981-g44510e44e717d9c05b0c5d197a73676a9427e32f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105318
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107096
Bug ID: 107096
Summary: Fully masking vectorization with AVX512 ICEs
gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-*.c
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105318
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10a116104969b3ecc9ea4abdd5436c66fd78d537
commit r13-2980-g10a116104969b3ecc9ea4abdd5436c66fd78d537
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106884
--- Comment #3 from Krister Walfridsson ---
A similar case is
int r1, r2;
int foo(int a, int s1, int s2)
{
if (a & (1 << s1))
return r1;
if (a & (1 << s2))
return r1;
return r2;
}
where reassoc2 optimizes this to always shift
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107088
--- Comment #6 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
I did a quick test using
diff --git a/gcc/cselib.cc b/gcc/cselib.cc
index 9b582e5d3d6..2fd0190bc79 100644
--- a/gcc/cselib.cc
+++ b/gcc/cselib.cc
@@ -1571,6 +1571,7 @@ new_cselib_val
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107092
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3213 is relevant, but we didn't address
the ambiguity question.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107092
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107095
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107095
Bug ID: 107095
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-89.c gets miscompiled by DSE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107025
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107094
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
Looks like related to PR107088
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107094
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107094
Bug ID: 107094
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in require, at machmode.h:297
since r13-2916-gd0b00b63a39108
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107093
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 53645
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53645=edit
prototype for WHILE_ULT
I'm playing with the attached. Note it requires the third operand patch for
WHILE_ULT (but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107093
Bug ID: 107093
Summary: AVX512 mask operations not simplified in fully masked
loop
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107065
--- Comment #13 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> Doing it on the match.pd side doesn't look right, there could be many other
> optimizations that result in something similar.
$ grep -c non_lvalue match.pd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107065
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93062
Christoph Müllner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christophm30 at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107088
--- Comment #5 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
Thanks for looking into this! Currently I'm out of office and have very limited
internet access. I will be back on Tuesday and look right into this. If this is
to late feel free to revert my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107065
--- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse ---
Did you try adding "non_lvalue" in match.pd? It looks less intrusive. Although
in the long term your approach seems better and the failures should be fixable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107065
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107065
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #53642|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106902
--- Comment #19 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #18)
> True - but does that catch the cases people are interested and are
> allowed by the FP contraction rules? I'm thinking of
>
> x = a*b + c*d + e +
93 matches
Mail list logo
