https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107716
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107686
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:246bbdaa5f536b7a199dda9860c473137f40d622
commit r13-4102-g246bbdaa5f536b7a199dda9860c473137f40d622
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107679
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a5f3663f8de45b7030dfe7ce962783dc1a19885
commit r13-4101-g8a5f3663f8de45b7030dfe7ce962783dc1a19885
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101491
--- Comment #12 from Lorenzo Salvadore
---
I have sent by mail an alternative patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/jit/2022q4/001572.html
It should be functionally equivalent to John's patch, but it is written with a
different style. It is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
Kevin Bracey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107711
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to urs from comment #2)
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 02:41:40PM +, dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > Unfortunately I can't reproduce the ICE with the attachment.
>
> Yes, attachment was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Bracey ---
Looking at that assembly output from Compiler Explorer, I'm also at a loss as
to what happened to the "6" for the VMUL. Maybe something else to look at?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107717
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107711
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 53911
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53911=edit
Work-in-progress patch to add logging to ana::on_finish_translation_unit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78655
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107715
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
There's a forward dependency over 'c' (read of c[i] vs. write of c[i+1] with
'i' iterating forward), and the vectorized variant takes the hit on each
iteration. How is a slowdown even surprising.
For
>
> Do you mean we should fix modeling of divisions there as well? I don't have
> latency/throughput measurements for those CPUs, nor access so I can run
> experiments myself, unfortunately.
>
> I guess you mean just making a patch to model division units separately,
> leaving latency/throughput
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
>
> Do you mean we should fix modeling of divisions there as well? I don't have
> latency/throughput measurements for those CPUs, nor access so I can run
> experiments myself, unfortunately.
>
> I guess you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107715
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107715
>
> --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
> Because store data races are allowed with -Ofast masked stores are not used so
> we instead get
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107711
--- Comment #2 from urs at akk dot org ---
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 02:41:40PM +, dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Unfortunately I can't reproduce the ICE with the attachment.
Yes, attachment was created with "-v -save-temps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107717
Bug ID: 107717
Summary: [13 Regression] ICEs expanding permutes after
g:dc95e1e9702f2f6367bbc108c8d01169be1b66d2
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107709
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> IVOPTs is usually quite careful with this and the infer of non-NULL from
> ptr + CST is new - that introduced a new undefinedness in GIMPLE. The
> workaround
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107715
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Because store data races are allowed with -Ofast masked stores are not used so
we instead get
vect__ifc__80.24_114 = VEC_COND_EXPR ;
_ifc__80 = _58 ? _45 : _ifc__78;
MEM [(double *)vectp_c.25_116]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107699
--- Comment #2 from Carlos Galvez ---
Looking deeply at the stacktrace, I see that std::sort ends up in this kind of
code:
if (__last - __first > int(_S_threshold))
{
std::__insertion_sort(__first, __first +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107709
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107711
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks for filing this bug report.
Unfortunately I can't reproduce the ICE with the attachment.
I have a suspicion that this relates to commits r13-4073-gd8aba860b34203 and/or
r13-4074-g86a90006864840 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107703
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
aarch64 isn't affected (yet), the __bf16 arithmetics support patch has just
been posted but not reviewed. So, on arm and aarch64 __bf16 is a store only
type one can't convert to/from nor use in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7)
> > 53730 r btver2_fp_min_issue_delay
> > 53760 r znver1_fp_transitions
> > 93960 r bdver3_fp_transitions
> > 106102 r lujiazui_core_check
> > 106102 r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107701
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
> 53730 r btver2_fp_min_issue_delay
> 53760 r znver1_fp_transitions
> 93960 r bdver3_fp_transitions
> 106102 r lujiazui_core_check
> 106102 r lujiazui_core_transitions
> 196123 r lujiazui_core_min_issue_delay
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107716
--- Comment #1 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
I am on a Linux mint box using KVM and
running a virtual box that is
OpenBSD mo.my.domain 7.2 GENERIC#381 i386
using
GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.2.0
and am getting negative values from NINT()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107715
Bug ID: 107715
Summary: TSVC s161 for double runs at zen4 30 times slower when
vectorization is enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107716
Bug ID: 107716
Summary: Getting negative values with NINT when using
doubleprecision values in range on i386
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107598
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107624
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107701
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec59848074ba8c4310cbadb603822bfaeff03a32
commit r13-4098-gec59848074ba8c4310cbadb603822bfaeff03a32
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Monakov ---
With these patches on trunk, current situation is:
nm -CS -t d --defined-only gcc/insn-automata.o | sed 's/^[0-9]* 0*//' | sort -n
| tail -40
2496 r slm_base
2527 r bdver3_load_min_issue_delay
2746 r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107649
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e2c5510e001e5ccbde9e4b7df757e2bba2fdb00
commit r13-4096-g0e2c5510e001e5ccbde9e4b7df757e2bba2fdb00
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107624
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf958f8f168f695d49e29297ef9fb37f6efa5d0f
commit r13-4095-gcf958f8f168f695d49e29297ef9fb37f6efa5d0f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107676
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexander Monakov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4cc7a8c4a623b62dd0d486d7780d91b58eb6f1f
commit r13-4093-gd4cc7a8c4a623b62dd0d486d7780d91b58eb6f1f
Author: Alexander Monakov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107676
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexander Monakov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85966f0d20baf50a767ac1110f537395441604a9
commit r13-4094-g85966f0d20baf50a767ac1110f537395441604a9
Author: Alexander Monakov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87832
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexander Monakov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd744f06c9952f92738b0860630085f0f0b99574
commit r13-4092-gdd744f06c9952f92738b0860630085f0f0b99574
Author: Alexander Monakov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107699
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|False positive |12/13 Regression] False
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107699
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107598
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107690
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107689
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
Bug ID: 107714
Summary: MVE: Invalid addressing mode generated for VLD2
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107679
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107683
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107682
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107678
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107645
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107645
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Max Filippov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99c9cbcc3ba3e005bad790a600853266a81d95ee
commit r13-4086-g99c9cbcc3ba3e005bad790a600853266a81d95ee
Author: Max Filippov
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107660
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107206
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 107206, which changed state.
Bug 107206 Summary: Bogus -Wuninitialized in std::optional
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107206
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107206
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:985a8962712a56d1c9418cf05e1761f8bd20cf8f
commit r12-8913-g985a8962712a56d1c9418cf05e1761f8bd20cf8f
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92706
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:985a8962712a56d1c9418cf05e1761f8bd20cf8f
commit r12-8913-g985a8962712a56d1c9418cf05e1761f8bd20cf8f
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #53907|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
--- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Created attachment 53907
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53907=edit
testcase
A more straightforward test (in C++).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
Milian Wolff changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mail at milianw dot de
--- Comment #69
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107698
--- Comment #2 from Li Shaohua ---
I found a new test where gcc-O1 misses the global-buffer-overflow. Not sure if
these two have the same root cause:
% cat a.c
int a, c;
int *b =
int main() {
int d = *b;
for (; c < 3; c++)
b = b + (d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
101 - 166 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
