[Bug preprocessor/105207] Translation phase 2: splicing physical source lines to form logical source lines may not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105207 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/55242] continued lines not always merged into one long line

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55242 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pavel.morozkin at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/108043] [13 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2618 on invalid function braced initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108043 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-10

[Bug c/108043] [13 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2618 on invalid function braced initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108043 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug analyzer/108045] New: analyzer: false positive memory leak

I omit the body of resize_screen() and place its instructions directly in main(), then the analyzer doesn't report anything is wrong. It seems the extra layer of indirection with the resize_screen() function trips it up. This problem happens with GCC 11.3.0, 12.1.0, and 13.0-20221209 nightly from Compile

[Bug target/108044] New: [13 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.cc:2692 (insn does not satisfy its constraints) at -O

sable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r13-4583-20221209191939-g71b31d13757-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 13.0.0 20221209 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c/108043] New: [13 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2618 on invalid function braced initializer

zstd gcc version 13.0.0 20221209 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug middle-end/108042] [10/11/12/13 Regression] weakref on an extern decl is incorrectly ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108042 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.5.3 Known to fail|

[Bug middle-end/108042] New: [10/11/12/13 Regression] weakref on an extern decl is incorrectly ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108042 Bug ID: 108042 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] weakref on an extern decl is incorrectly ignored Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug fortran/107995] ICE: Segmentation fault, without backtrace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107995 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/81615] save-temps and gfortran produces *.f90 files instead of *.i or *i90 files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615 --- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl --- On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 01:47:44AM +, barrowes at alum dot mit.edu wrote: > > Thanks for engaging, and thanks for the suggestion. I might be able to do this > over the winter. Could you give me a hint as

[Bug fortran/81615] save-temps and gfortran produces *.f90 files instead of *.i or *i90 files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615 --- Comment #14 from Ben Barrowes --- Thanks for engaging, and thanks for the suggestion. I might be able to do this over the winter. Could you give me a hint as to where to look. Which files.

[Bug ipa/108000] Assert during ipa-cp with AutoFDO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108000 Eugene Rozenfeld changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/104921] aarch64: Assembler failure with vbfmlalbq_lane_f32 intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104921 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- The following patterns has the same problem too: (define_insn "aarch64_bfdot_lane" [(set (match_operand:VDQSF 0 "register_operand" "=w") (plus:VDQSF (unspec:VDQSF

[Bug target/104921] aarch64: Assembler failure with vbfmlalbq_lane_f32 intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104921 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (define_insn "aarch64_bfmlal_lanev4sf" [(set (match_operand:V4SF 0 "register_operand" "=w") (plus: V4SF (match_operand:V4SF 1 "register_operand" "0") (unspec:V4SF

[Bug libgcc/107675] [13 Regression] GCC-13 is significantly slower to startup on C++ statically linked programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107675 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Neumann --- > You cannot use 'relaxed' atomic load in is_object_initialized - as thread > performing such load will not observe/synchronize with any modifications > (other than atomic variable itself) performed by

[Bug tree-optimization/108041] New: ivopts results in extra instruction in simple loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108041 Bug ID: 108041 Summary: ivopts results in extra instruction in simple loop Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/104921] aarch64: Assembler failure with vbfmlalbq_lane_f32 intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104921 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO since r7-4096-gbf9f15ee55f5b291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01254aa2eb766c7584fd047568d7277d4d65d067 commit r13-4585-g01254aa2eb766c7584fd047568d7277d4d65d067 Author: Paul Thomas Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/108039] Unnecessary extension storing same value twice to small location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108039 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I did something similar years ago: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2010-October/297761.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2010-October/297762.html

[Bug c++/108040] New: -fdevirtualize causes part of function to be missing in output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108040 Bug ID: 108040 Summary: -fdevirtualize causes part of function to be missing in output Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/108039] Unnecessary extension on riscv-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108039 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|riscv-64|riscv64 aarch64 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/108039] Unnecessary extension on riscv-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108039 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/108039] New: Unnecessary extension on riscv-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108039 Bug ID: 108039 Summary: Unnecessary extension on riscv-64 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO since r7-4096-gbf9f15ee55f5b291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot

[Bug target/108038] New: GCC generates poor code for select of consecutive constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108038 Bug ID: 108038 Summary: GCC generates poor code for select of consecutive constants Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO since r7-4096-gbf9f15ee55f5b291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/107579] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on fold-expression on .* member access operator since r12-2862-g9707d2e5dbb92d2b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107579 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka --- This is essentially a dup of PR100295, except here the unevaluated context is a requires-expr instead of sizeof, and r12-2862 exposed this bug by making us correctly recognize a requires-expr as an

[Bug libgcc/107675] [13 Regression] GCC-13 is significantly slower to startup on C++ statically linked programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107675 m.cencora at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.cencora at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/107495] GCC does not consider the right contextual implicit conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107495 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Giuseppe D'Angelo from comment #1) > Variation of the above: The testcase in comment #1 is almost definitely the same as PR 59328. Note the testcase in comment #0 is also rejected by clang

[Bug fortran/81615] save-temps and gfortran produces *.f90 files instead of *.i or *i90 files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug middle-end/108036] [11/12/13 Regression] Spurious warning for zero-sized array parameters to a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036 --- Comment #5 from Alejandro Colomar --- Interesting. Thanks for clarifying :)

[Bug middle-end/108036] [11/12/13 Regression] Spurious warning for zero-sized array parameters to a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Alejandro Colomar from comment #3) > - In the reduced test case, you call the pointer to one past the end as > 'end'. That is misleading, since 'end' is commonly also used for pointers > to

[Bug middle-end/108036] [11/12/13 Regression] Spurious warning for zero-sized array parameters to a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036 --- Comment #3 from Alejandro Colomar --- Hi Andrew! Just a few nitpicks: - In the first testcase you posted, the [] is missing the 0: [0]. - In the reduced test case, you call the pointer to one past the end as 'end'. That is misleading,

[Bug middle-end/108036] [11/12/13 Regression] Spurious warning for zero-sized array parameters to a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/108036] [11/12/13 Regression] Spurious warning for zero-sized array parameters to a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 54056 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54056=edit Reduced testcase

[Bug c/108036] Spurious warning for zero-sized array parameters to a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 54055 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54055=edit Full testcase that actually compiles

[Bug libstdc++/108035] libstdc++ implementation of std::source_location::function_name() provides an empty string when used with clang++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108035 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv

[Bug c/108037] New: prefer for affinity with OMP_PROC_BIND=true to match "spread" instead of "close"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108037 Bug ID: 108037 Summary: prefer for affinity with OMP_PROC_BIND=true to match "spread" instead of "close" Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/108035] libstdc++ implementation of std::source_location::function_name() provides an empty string when used with clang++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108035 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Right, if Clang doesn't provide a name then there's nothing libstdc++ can do about it.

[Bug libstdc++/108035] libstdc++ implementation of std::source_location::function_name() provides an empty string when used with clang++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108035 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- That looks solely like a clang issue. It implements the builtin gcc has added for - __builtin_source_location () - but fills in _M_function_name with just "" rather than a pretty name.

[Bug tree-optimization/107997] [10/11/12/13 Regression] r13-4389-gfd8dd6c0384969 probably uncovered an issue building the Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997 --- Comment #10 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- I gave that patch a try: GCC build is successful, as is the Linux build afterwards using that toolchain. (Cannot test the resulting kernel of course---I don't have the hardware.)

[Bug c/108036] New: Spurious warning for zero-sized array parameters to a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108036 Bug ID: 108036 Summary: Spurious warning for zero-sized array parameters to a function Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/108035] New: std::source_location::function_name() provides an empty string when used with clang++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108035 Bug ID: 108035 Summary: std::source_location::function_name() provides an empty string when used with clang++ Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569 --- Comment #43 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #42) > On #c0 foo, this was previously optimized in dom2 which optimized > _4 = ABS_EXPR ; > _3 = _4 u>

[Bug web/107333] bugzilla see also should support savannah bug URLs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107333 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug web/108034] New: cannot use bug alias name in see also

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108034 Bug ID: 108034 Summary: cannot use bug alias name in see also Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: web

[Bug libstdc++/106852] Implement C++23 P2465R3 Standard Library Modules std and std.compat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106852 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/106658] [C++23] P2590 - Explicit lifetime management

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106658 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/106657] [C++23] P2460 - Relax requirements on wchar_t to match existing practices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106657 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/106653] [C++23] P2582 - Class template argument deduction from inherited constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106653 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/106650] [C++23] P2280 - Using unknown references in constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106650 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/105595] Coroutines can trigger -Wsubobject-linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105595 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/106652] [C++23] P1467 - Extended floating-point types and standard names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106652 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago at kde dot org --- Comment #19

[Bug c++/105509] [compatibility] f16 suffix not supported in C++ mode - unable to find numeric literal operator ‘operator""f16’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105509 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug target/104951] avx512fintrin.h(9146): error: identifier "__builtin_ia32_rndscaless_round" is undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104951 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/104471] ICE with -nostdinc: NULL directory in find_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104471 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- This patch should fix the issue (I might get to it in a few weeks though): diff --git a/libcpp/files.cc b/libcpp/files.cc index a18b1caf48d..eb90fa4f65a 100644 --- a/libcpp/files.cc +++ b/libcpp/files.cc @@

[Bug preprocessor/104471] ICE with -nostdinc: NULL directory in find_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104471 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/108030] `std::experimental::simd` not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Matthias Kretz (Vir) from comment #3) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > > I bet by adding too many always_inline functions that call normal inlines > > that is what is bound to

[Bug target/108033] -G should be an alias to -msmall-data-limit=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108033 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/108033] New: -G should be an alias to -msmall-data-limit=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108033 Bug ID: 108033 Summary: -G should be an alias to -msmall-data-limit= Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/108030] `std::experimental::simd` not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > I bet by adding too many always_inline functions that call normal inlines > that is what is bound to happen, one runs into inline growth limits. It is >

[Bug target/108032] internal compiler error : in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3079

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108032 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/107977] ICE: in add_specializations, at cp/module.cc:13186 with -fdump-ada-spec -fmodule-header since r11-6084-g4efde6781bba8d64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107977 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE: |ICE: in |in

[Bug target/108032] internal compiler error : in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3079

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108032 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/105753] [avr] ICE: in add_clobbers, at config/avr/avr-dimode.md:2705

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105753 --- Comment #9 from fiesh at zefix dot tv --- I forgot to mention that my test case requires -flto to be present.

[Bug c++/108032] New: internal compiler error : in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3079

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108032 Bug ID: 108032 Summary: internal compiler error : in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3079 Product: gcc Version: 9.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/108031] riscv: Access of members of a global structure is not optimized in atomic operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108031 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|target

[Bug target/105753] [avr] ICE: in add_clobbers, at config/avr/avr-dimode.md:2705

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105753 fiesh at zefix dot tv changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fiesh at zefix dot tv ---

[Bug target/108031] riscv: Access of members of a global structure is not optimized in atomic operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108031 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |target Severity|normal

[Bug libstdc++/108030] `std::experimental::simd` not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/107997] [10/11/12/13 Regression] r13-4389-gfd8dd6c0384969 probably uncovered an issue building the Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/107714] MVE: Invalid addressing mode generated for VLD2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714 Stam Markianos-Wright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/107551] __builtin_cpu_supports returns a negative integer for "x86-64"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107551 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/107551] __builtin_cpu_supports returns a negative integer for "x86-64"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107551 --- Comment #25 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ec102e3290ff1cac457420a1219fa1ca370 commit r12-8966-g5ec102e3290ff1cac457420a1219fa1ca370 Author: Martin Liska

[Bug fortran/81615] save-temps and gfortran produces *.f90 files instead of *.i or *i90 files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615 --- Comment #12 from Ben Barrowes --- I use these intermediate files during the software analysis process, but then delete them later. They are useful for me to have. When I am given a makefile, it is often 1000's loc. I am not sure I want to

[Bug target/108031] New: riscv: Access of members of a global structure is not optimized in atomic operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108031 Bug ID: 108031 Summary: riscv: Access of members of a global structure is not optimized in atomic operations Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/107976] ICE: SIGSEGV (stack overflow) in emit_case_dispatch_table (stmt.cc:783) with large --param=jump-table-max-growth-ratio-for-speed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107976 --- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka --- Thank you for having a look. If anything is done with the param limits, jump-table-max-growth-ratio-for-size should probably receive the same care.

[Bug libstdc++/108030] `std::experimental::simd` not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030 Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mkretz at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/108030] `std::experimental::simd` not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030 Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/108030] New: `std::experimental::simd` not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030 Bug ID: 108030 Summary: `std::experimental::simd` not inlined Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/108027] mcf thread model causes build issues for multilibs of x86_64-w64-mingw32 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027 --- Comment #8 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to LIU Hao from comment #7) > The .la files generated by libtool are usually nonsense > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveLaFiles). If you run `make > install` by hand then you may delete

[Bug sanitizer/108029] GCC'ASAN at -O0 failed to detect a memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108029 --- Comment #3 from Li Shaohua --- (In reply to Li Shaohua from comment #2) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > > I can see the leak with both gcc-12 and gcc master. > > Interesting, because I tested using Compiler explorer. On my

[Bug sanitizer/108029] GCC'ASAN at -O0 failed to detect a memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108029 --- Comment #2 from Li Shaohua --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > I can see the leak with both gcc-12 and gcc master. Interesting, because I tested using Compiler explorer. On my local machines, some gcc-12 -O0 won't report, but

[Bug sanitizer/108029] GCC'ASAN at -O0 failed to detect a memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108029 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/108029] New: GCC'ASAN at -O0 failed to detect a memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108029 Bug ID: 108029 Summary: GCC'ASAN at -O0 failed to detect a memory leak Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/107409] Perf loss ~5% on 519.lbm_r SPEC cpu2017 benchmark with r10-5090-ga9a4edf0e71bba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107409 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- Note the mentioned revision is a fix and yes, sometimes these revisions can end up with a regression as profile estimation is a complex guess.

[Bug driver/108022] [11/12/13 regression] -frecord-gcc-switches doesn't record preprocessor macros since r11-5739-g7caa49706316e6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108022 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Yes, -ggdb3 seems to me like a reasonable solution. Note you can always strip the debuginfo into a separate file.

[Bug tree-optimization/107409] Perf loss ~5% on 519.lbm_r SPEC cpu2017 benchmark with r10-5090-ga9a4edf0e71bba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107409 --- Comment #12 from Rama Malladi --- I found difference in dumps at various stages of the compilation for the mainline GCC and with update_max_bb_count() commented. Here are the details: Mainline: Commit ID:

[Bug c/107993] ICE: tree check: expected string_cst, have integer_cst in get_target_clone_attr_len, at tree.cc:14872

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107993 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/107990] ICE: in vague_linkage_p, at cp/decl2.cc:2231 with -fno-elide-constructors -fno-weak and lambdas since r6-67-gefb5e8170a77bb24

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107990 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug target/107984] ICE: in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.cc:1553 with -O2 -fselective-scheduling2 -mabi=ms -mavx512vl since r9-5221-gd8fcab689435a29d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107984 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-09

[Bug c++/107977] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: in add_specializations, at cp/module.cc:13186 with -fdump-ada-spec -fmodule-header since r11-6084-g4efde6781bba8d64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107977 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE: in |[11/12/13 Regression] ICE:

[Bug target/107551] __builtin_cpu_supports returns a negative integer for "x86-64"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107551 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.2.0 Known to work|

[Bug target/107551] __builtin_cpu_supports returns a negative integer for "x86-64"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107551 --- Comment #23 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d71b20fc30965ba8326ad9363d0aca9d61eb4ed3 commit r13-4581-gd71b20fc30965ba8326ad9363d0aca9d61eb4ed3 Author: Martin Liska Date:

[Bug libstdc++/108027] mcf thread model causes build issues for multilibs of x86_64-w64-mingw32 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027 --- Comment #7 from LIU Hao --- The .la files generated by libtool are usually nonsense (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveLaFiles). If you run `make install` by hand then you may delete them by hand. Some packagers (e.g. makepkg on

[Bug libstdc++/108027] mcf thread model causes build issues for multilibs of x86_64-w64-mingw32 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108027 --- Comment #6 from LIU Hao --- That's not a GCC bug. That's because you have installed libraries to the default but wrong location.