https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108305
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
My assumption was that targets that don't support exclusive mode for fopen
would fail in exactly that way, and so using std::ios::noreplace would be
"conservatively unsupported". That is, it would always
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108305
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
But then wouldn't using "x" with fopen fail, return NULL, and set errno to
EINVAL?
It shouldn't just ignore the "x".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108314
Bug ID: 108314
Summary: [13 Regression] Segfault in
gimple-match-head.cc:do_valueize when vectorizing for
SVE
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108286
--- Comment #5 from Jan André Reuter ---
I tried to compile and run the source code I uploaded when creating the ticket.
I used the latest daily bump:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=53ef7c1d9a44a2c681d4b3433a853cd4461be8c5
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108244
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Summary|[13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106133
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108292
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b990e80e39b41ec028d018eac7d2d040a537b681
commit r13-5043-gb990e80e39b41ec028d018eac7d2d040a537b681
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108308
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b990e80e39b41ec028d018eac7d2d040a537b681
commit r13-5043-gb990e80e39b41ec028d018eac7d2d040a537b681
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108305
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect hpux does not implement a c11 fopen but only a c99 one ..
"x" was only added for c11 .
Hpux11.11 came out in 2009 after all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108313
--- Comment #3 from niXman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Dup of bug 108300
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 108300 ***
ah, got it. thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108300
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i.nixman at autistici dot org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108313
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108313
--- Comment #1 from niXman ---
file/line to the buggy line:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=libcpp/system.h;h=e80cf029d88fcb74db5515b4b2915d72df0974dc;hb=refs/heads/master#l404
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108305
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That test expects fopen("noreplace", "wx") to fail if the file already exists.
Does this fail too?
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
FILE* f = fopen("noreplace", "w");
assert(f != NULL);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108292
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108313
Bug ID: 108313
Summary: smth strange with libcpp/system.h: abort()
redefinition
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108280
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7097d2aafcae4b1cb89c28ff4fd4af18df9a2cef
commit r10-11152-g7097d2aafcae4b1cb89c28ff4fd4af18df9a2cef
Author:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47334
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7097d2aafcae4b1cb89c28ff4fd4af18df9a2cef
commit r10-11152-g7097d2aafcae4b1cb89c28ff4fd4af18df9a2cef
Author: Francois-Xavier
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47334
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65b768fdb1ad302a6537119305317f413bfcbe0e
commit r11-10455-g65b768fdb1ad302a6537119305317f413bfcbe0e
Author: Francois-Xavier
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103823
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65b768fdb1ad302a6537119305317f413bfcbe0e
commit r11-10455-g65b768fdb1ad302a6537119305317f413bfcbe0e
Author:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6)
> @marxin is this something you checked during the sphinx conversion and
> reversion at all?
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> Well, running 'make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93082
--- Comment #14 from Sam James ---
This seems to be fixed in the latest macOS SDK (13.1 at least). But obviously
that doesn't help folks who need to use older SDKs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108311
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-01-06
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #7 from Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108312
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110
--- Comment #17 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #16)
> I have posted the sorting patch to the mailing list:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609459.html
I confirm the test fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108280
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Martin
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
