https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105753
--- Comment #13 from fiesh at zefix dot tv ---
User99627, a few points:
* My test case does require lto to be present. There's nothing to be gained
from your statement that the bug doesn't require lto, there are test cases for
either case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108500
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97258480438db77e52f4b3947fa2c075b09d3fe1
commit r13-5617-g97258480438db77e52f4b3947fa2c075b09d3fe1
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108601
--- Comment #12 from Hongtao.liu ---
> When the VF is not known we usually do not require an epilogue? If
> we don't require one we should avoid creating one.
I may not be very clear in my description， here gdb shows.
(gdb) p vf
$1 = {> =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108622
--- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-February/611081.html [PATCH]
x86: Use DW_EH_PE_indirect|DW_EH_PE_pcrel encodings for -fno-pic code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108601
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108601
>
> --- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #9)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108583
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108583
>
> --- Comment #18 from Tamar Christina ---
> > >
> > > Ack, that also tracks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108601
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #9)
> >
> >
> > decode_options() {
> > int flag = 1;
> > for (; flag <= 1 << 21; flag <<= 1)
> > ;
> > }
Normally when vf is not constant, it will be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108622
Bug ID: 108622
Summary: x86 -fno-pic: use DW_EH_PE_indirect|DW_EH_PE_pcrel for
personality/ttype encoding
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105144
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Khem Raj from comment #10)
>
> you are right. I should have mentioned that these copying is done by yocto
> builds for working though its notion of multilibs [1]. However, I think if
> we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105144
--- Comment #10 from Khem Raj ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Khem Raj from comment #7)
> > > in Yocto we build outside the source tree. And during cross-build it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105144
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> (In reply to Khem Raj from comment #7)
> > in Yocto we build outside the source tree. And during cross-build it will
> > copy aarch64.h into builddir and use it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105144
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Khem Raj from comment #7)
> in Yocto we build outside the source tree. And during cross-build it will
> copy aarch64.h into builddir and use it from there but then build can not
> find files it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105144
--- Comment #7 from Khem Raj ---
in Yocto we build outside the source tree. And during cross-build it will copy
aarch64.h into builddir and use it from there but then build can not find files
it includes since its being included from builddir.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108601
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
>
>
> decode_options() {
> int flag = 1;
> for (; flag <= 1 << 21; flag <<= 1)
> ;
> }
>
>
>
> compile with gcc -fprofile-generate -mcpu=neoverse-v1 -Ofast opts.i
Reproduced with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108621
Bug ID: 108621
Summary: [12 regression]: bind(c) pointer array spurious
maybe-uninitialized warning
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105144
Khem Raj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raj.khem at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108620
--- Comment #2 from owent ---
Created attachment 54381
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54381=edit
The new report file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108620
--- Comment #1 from owent ---
Sorry, there are some problem in the source above. I commit another source and
report file.And clang 15 can compile and run successfully(
https://godbolt.org/z/d5M9ca567 ).
## Command and output
```
$ g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108620
Bug ID: 108620
Summary: internal compiler error: in instantiate_type, at
cp/class.cc:8742 when assign the return value of
co_yield to a member of class/struct
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108616
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108616
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70d34f2a30a5f1a2a09f547d92243db32d79f3f7
commit r13-5614-g70d34f2a30a5f1a2a09f547d92243db32d79f3f7
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108612
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note it looks like type_traits uses this pattern. Though I am shocked it didn't
show up in testing ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87035
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108559
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108559
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b533084d756a2696a3eb6521810e0a0b2182a8e8
commit r13-5611-gb533084d756a2696a3eb6521810e0a0b2182a8e8
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107574
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105753
--- Comment #12 from User99627 ---
Here's some feedback.
I asked in Manjaro Forums to make it so that avr-gcc is capped to version
10.1.0. The answer has been "Manjaro uses Arch application tree".
So I created an account to Arch bugzilla and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108106
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9fbc6687faa09bf045c0fcee7960b7fef796fcc
commit r13-5610-ga9fbc6687faa09bf045c0fcee7960b7fef796fcc
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Jan 31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108618
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Kyle Shores from comment #8)
> Thanks for looking into this. I believe that this worked for you, but for
> me, on both my machine and in the docker container, that addition did not
> fix the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108618
--- Comment #8 from Kyle Shores ---
Thanks for looking into this. I believe that this worked for you, but for me,
on both my machine and in the docker container, that addition did not fix the
problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108618
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108600
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0)
> Note that for for instance gdb test-case gdb.ada/ref_param.exp, this
> convention was broken for gcc 7.5.0 (and I don't know how much earlier), and
> my current
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108619
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And it would be nice to simplify allocator_traits::construct using if-constexpr
too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108619
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108618
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 54379
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54379=edit
FortranCode
about c++20 mode, and the rebind isn't needed in
C++20 (because std::allocator::rebind doesn't exist, so the default
implementation of rebinding does the right thing for alloc).
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> With clang and libc++ we get:
>
> /opt/compiler-explorer/clang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108619
--- Comment #8 from gccbugzilla at thepirate42 dot org ---
The same code (with added rebind, https://godbolt.org/z/6fabvnvE7) compiles in
c++17 mode, while in c++20 mode (also with added rebind,
https://godbolt.org/z/ehhzYd5Wo) it doesn't, which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108619
--- Comment #7 from gccbugzilla at thepirate42 dot org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> With clang and libc++ we get:
>
> /opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk-20230131/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/
> uninitialized_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108619
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
With clang and libc++ we get:
/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk-20230131/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/uninitialized_algorithms.h:597:3:
error: static assertion failed due to requirement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108619
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to gccbugzilla from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > Once I add:
> >
> > template struct rebind {
> > typedef alloc other;
> > };
> >
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108619
gccbugzilla at thepirate42 dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108619
gccbugzilla at thepirate42 dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108601
--- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina ---
In case it helps, here's the reproducer on compiler explorer and the dump file
https://godbolt.org/z/dWvqexjnv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108619
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108619
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The trunk gives a better error message:
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20230131/include/c++/13.0.1/bits/alloc_traits.h:70:31:
error: static assertion failed:
allocator_traits::rebind_alloc must be A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108601
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64*
Summary|[13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108619
Bug ID: 108619
Summary: Compilation error if the construct method of the
allocator isn't implemented and the detructor of
value_type is private
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108354
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Full backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0158208f in get_range_query (fun=0x0) at
/home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/value-query.h:143
#1 0x01e4a9f0 in ssa_name_has_boolean_range
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108354
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access
0x015769b4 in get_range_query (fun=) at
gcc/gcc/configure
--prefix=/home/apinski/upstream-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,go,ada
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 13.0.1 20230131 (experimental) [master 733988099bc] (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-B' '../../' '-c' '-g' '-O2' '-Wextra' '-Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108618
--- Comment #5 from Kyle Shores ---
New C++ source file:
```
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
extern "C" {
void Finit(void);
void get_names( CFI_cdesc_t * );
}
std::vector extract_names(CFI_cdesc_t* names){
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108618
--- Comment #4 from Kyle Shores ---
Sure, I'll attempt to remove gtest and cmake. I was merely slimming the example
down from my use case in case it mattered.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108618
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108618
--- Comment #3 from Kyle Shores ---
Ah, the specific error message printed at runtime:
Fortran runtime error: Unexpected version 16 (expected 1) in CFI descriptor
passed to dummy argument the_names
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108618
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
and use make rather than cmake here?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108618
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Is there a way to remove the depedency on gtest/gtest.h ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108618
Bug ID: 108618
Summary: ISO C-Fortran Interface fails to pass CFI descriptor
version check when using code coverage flags for
fortran
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107755
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108609
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-01-31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108598
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86960
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102870
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102870
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2ec2504af77b35e748067eeb846821d12a6b6b4
commit r13-5608-gb2ec2504af77b35e748067eeb846821d12a6b6b4
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103100
--- Comment #19 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #18)
> I should say that testcase happens at `-Os -mstrict-align`, at `-O2
> -mstrict-align` it works.
Because for -Os we don't forcibly align arrays - see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102870
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108617
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||104426
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108617
Bug ID: 108617
Summary: nullptr comparision in constexpr not constexpr when
using -fsanitize=returns-nonnull-attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103100
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #17)
> Another testcase which is now affecting us at Marvell in our early firmware:
> ```
> void f(const char*);
>
> void g(void)
> {
> char t[32] = "0l2345678";
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103100
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
Another testcase which is now affecting us at Marvell in our early firmware:
```
void f(const char*);
void g(void)
{
char t[32] = "0l2345678";
f(t);
}
```
So I am planning on getting back on this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108573
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- gcc/ree.cc.jj 2023-01-02 09:32:45.327953792 +0100
+++ gcc/ree.cc 2023-01-31 18:36:31.253018233 +0100
@@ -875,7 +875,8 @@ combine_reaching_defs (ext_cand *cand, c
for (df_link *use =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108616
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108616
Bug ID: 108616
Summary: -Wanalyzer-allocation-size false negatives for use of
"alloca"
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108573
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108597
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07ef737cf1ab08f5c36786c7ab1ffc596fe52138
commit r12-9093-g07ef737cf1ab08f5c36786c7ab1ffc596fe52138
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107593
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107593
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07ef737cf1ab08f5c36786c7ab1ffc596fe52138
commit r12-9093-g07ef737cf1ab08f5c36786c7ab1ffc596fe52138
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108597
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108573
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107593
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:623730d954a051941ae6a098f851bef308916ca0
commit r13-5582-g623730d954a051941ae6a098f851bef308916ca0
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108597
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:623730d954a051941ae6a098f851bef308916ca0
commit r13-5582-g623730d954a051941ae6a098f851bef308916ca0
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108221
--- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #22)
> Use --without-libstdcxx-zoneinfo
I'll make that the default for msp430-elf and avr.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108607
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mserdarsanli at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108613
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108613
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
signed __int128_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108613
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108589
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Philipp Tomsich :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a39c6ec97906766ad65d15d4856fd41121ee7a45
commit r13-5581-ga39c6ec97906766ad65d15d4856fd41121ee7a45
Author: Philipp Tomsich
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108611
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
I think the code uses to quote some non-normative statement:
"F2018 relaxes the requirement that, in structure constructor, the component
and the expression to initialize it must have the same declared
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108606
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108606
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108608
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2bb444787ed17a9e786f544cdf51ee2ac6779ab2
commit r13-5580-g2bb444787ed17a9e786f544cdf51ee2ac6779ab2
Author: Richard Sandiford
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108583
--- Comment #18 from Tamar Christina ---
> >
> > Ack, that also tracks with what I tried before, we don't indeed track ranges
> > for vector ops. The general case can still be handled slightly better (I
> > think)
> > but it doesn't become as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108613
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108385
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Macleod ---
Fixed in GCC 13, unlikely to be ported to gcc12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108359
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108385
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1626ec53e8c1b9c245572417d380e3ed84990cff
commit r13-5579-g1626ec53e8c1b9c245572417d380e3ed84990cff
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108359
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:809d661aff99ae0287baf4a52269425de62381e6
commit r13-5578-g809d661aff99ae0287baf4a52269425de62381e6
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108462
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
