https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108500
--- Comment #22 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #20)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> > Thanks for the new testcase. With -O0 (and a --enable-checking=release
> > built compiler) this builds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108737
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106722
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:338739645b8e5bf34636d8d4829d7650001ad08c
commit r13-5958-g338739645b8e5bf34636d8d4829d7650001ad08c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100927
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108768
Bug ID: 108768
Summary: bogus -Warray-bounds warnings
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108767
Bug ID: 108767
Summary: O2 optimization has side effects on static analysis.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108272
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108348
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108396
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108348
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bbed35a05d735387d406afbf866384feaac21e7
commit r10-11212-g7bbed35a05d735387d406afbf866384feaac21e7
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108272
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec4d91aa885297c3b5bb4bbfb3133ffe2e5e6a2f
commit r10-11211-gec4d91aa885297c3b5bb4bbfb3133ffe2e5e6a2f
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108348
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e41d8a77887b838de5493c491f411274376227a
commit r11-10522-g0e41d8a77887b838de5493c491f411274376227a
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108272
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79a81d526babb6ffb6d85b4a05b29269470ab49d
commit r11-10521-g79a81d526babb6ffb6d85b4a05b29269470ab49d
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108396
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb6861acc4074fd2c30a96b52d68c2cd33b9e94d
commit r12-9170-gcb6861acc4074fd2c30a96b52d68c2cd33b9e94d
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108272
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5a63c986978699a25f4bfb9b58a0111951e7d43
commit r12-9168-ge5a63c986978699a25f4bfb9b58a0111951e7d43
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108348
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c7bb6c0b0003f4e1fb52f814ad1a9a7f09573c6
commit r12-9169-g3c7bb6c0b0003f4e1fb52f814ad1a9a7f09573c6
Author: Kewen Lin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108752
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108766
Bug ID: 108766
Summary: unaligned byteswapped 16bit load is just bad
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108765
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
>seems to be a separate issue and a new regression.
It is not, it is just a reduced testcase and the ICE happens with GCC 6 and
above with -fchecking very similar and all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108765
--- Comment #3 from Martin Uecker ---
I see. Thanks. The checking is new? Or just because it is not a release built?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107840
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
```
int main()
{
void foo(void)
{
__label__ trgt;
void jmp(void) { goto trgt; }
trgt: ;
}
foo();
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108765
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107840
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 108765 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108765
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0, 6.1.0
Version|13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108765
Bug ID: 108765
Summary: ICE with non-local goto
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108423
--- Comment #8 from Martin Uecker ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-February/611562.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105660
--- Comment #11 from Martin Uecker ---
PATCH: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-February/611817.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108761
--- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song ---
New syntax setting the flags will be useful. Also, currently there is no way to
customize the section type.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108743
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> Hmm,
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/B4F496F4-F31D-41D2-8942-
> 1f0aefbd7...@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk/
>
> Seems didn't get installed even though it was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100927
--- Comment #3 from Michael Crusoe ---
Good question, lets check the reference.
Summary: it is specified behavior that _mm_cvttpd_epi32 returns Integer
Indefinite (8000H) for NaN inputs.
All references below are from the December 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108764
--- Comment #5 from Sinan ---
(In reply to Kito Cheng from comment #3)
> > I think one solution is to change the cost model of such complex
> > instructions to the sum of the cost for each part. E.g.
> > cost for shNadd = COSTS_N_INSNS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108764
--- Comment #4 from Sinan ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> sllia4,a2,3
> sh3add a5,a2,a0
>
> vs
> sllia2,a2,3
> add a5,a0,a2
>
> I think the first one is better really because you have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108764
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kito at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100927
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Are you sure _mm_cvttpd_epi32 is documented that way? I suspect it is just
unspecified behavior.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100927
Michael Crusoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.crusoe at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108764
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
sllia4,a2,3
sh3add a5,a2,a0
vs
sllia2,a2,3
add a5,a0,a2
I think the first one is better really because you have two indepedent
instructions and can be issued
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108763
--- Comment #6 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'll add it as a note to the deviations page.
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gdc/Missing-Features.html#Missing-Features
I'd actually forgotten about this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108763
ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
38 matches
Mail list logo
