https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70476
--- Comment #13 from Jiang An ---
(In reply to Maciej S. Szmigiero from comment #11)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> > Does these two functions the same name then?
> > ```
> > namespace a {
> >extern "C" void f(void);
> > }
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70476
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #12 from Jian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109074
--- Comment #13 from Murugesan Nagarajan ---
MY LAST COMMENT:
I agree.
Normally I used to handle bug fix using following ways:
1. Steps to reproduce to issue creating core dump files.
There are some other ways which may work(Example: -pthread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101766
--- Comment #7 from Vincent Fazio ---
Created attachment 54646
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54646&action=edit
partial patch for microblaze migration to elfos.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101766
--- Comment #6 from Vincent Fazio ---
Created attachment 54645
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54645&action=edit
add macro to microblaze.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101766
Vincent Fazio changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vfazio at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108886
--- Comment #4 from Jonny Grant ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jonny Grant from comment #2)
> > I was taught to validate parameters at University. Personally I always
> > follow defensive programming approaches
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031
--- Comment #30 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb1d8df792f990574cbb695b55c92ee2684fc96b
commit r13-6621-geb1d8df792f990574cbb695b55c92ee2684fc96b
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109074
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Murugesan Nagarajan from comment #10)
> Hence sigabrt signal needs to be handler at libc.so.6 Library
Stop trying to "handle" the error and FIX IT. The error is that you didn't link
to libpt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109106
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
When an output error occurs it returns < 0. Only printf("") or printf("%s",
"") can return 0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109106
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Why do you think printf will not return zero in some cases? Especially if
stdout is write fails.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109099
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108583
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108583
--- Comment #30 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f23dc726875c26f2c38dfded453aa9beba0b9be9
commit r13-6620-gf23dc726875c26f2c38dfded453aa9beba0b9be9
Author: Tamar Christina
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108583
--- Comment #28 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b3c630fcc44063a61f6131af48a4171b1de2b37
commit r13-6618-g0b3c630fcc44063a61f6131af48a4171b1de2b37
Author: Tamar Christina
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108583
--- Comment #29 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81fd62d1378b7ddc1fa0967cbddcdcdcdd2d8d8c
commit r13-6619-g81fd62d1378b7ddc1fa0967cbddcdcdcdd2d8d8c
Author: Tamar Christina
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108583
--- Comment #26 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2246d576f922bae3629da0fe1dbfcc6ff06769ad
commit r13-6616-g2246d576f922bae3629da0fe1dbfcc6ff06769ad
Author: Tamar Christina
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108583
--- Comment #27 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03c6ba86757f0684c5419c90651106900f5ecb5a
commit r13-6617-g03c6ba86757f0684c5419c90651106900f5ecb5a
Author: Tamar Christina
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107426
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #54643|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107426
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #54641|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107426
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin ---
Created attachment 54642
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54642&action=edit
Dra
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #3)
> Created attachment 54641 [details]
> Draft patch
>
> I couldn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109108
Bug ID: 109108
Summary: d: Undefined reference to lambda in private enum
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109106
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
printf can still return 0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109107
Bug ID: 109107
Summary: UBsan since GCC-8 misses an integer-overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: san
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532
--- Comment #21 from Kohei Takahashi ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #18)
> (In reply to Barnabás Pőcze from comment #17)
> > The simple test case with std::span still triggers the warning:
> > https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/43cKxdqr3. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109089
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109089
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:431c06691dcbb84c7d999d91202537442e6a60f0
commit r13-6614-g431c06691dcbb84c7d999d91202537442e6a60f0
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109106
Bug ID: 109106
Summary: GCC Static Analyzer doesn't model printf
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyze
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107426
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532
--- Comment #20 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
I'm running this rev:
g++-13 (Gentoo 13.0.1. p, commit 27495bc8fe028d4a68e97ad12b52231772e48dcf)
13.0.1 20230308 (experimental)
And I still get a warning for this testcase:
// $ cat ref.cpp
#include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108923
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Mikael Morin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b0c9631ccb492c4457a91dbb91e7a5bcd0bc2a6
commit r12-9244-g7b0c9631ccb492c4457a91dbb91e7a5bcd0bc2a6
Author: Mikael Morin
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108923
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Mikael Morin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd65c727fd6d5a252964dbeb3a735daa0a521a89
commit r12-9243-gcd65c727fd6d5a252964dbeb3a735daa0a521a89
Author: Mikael Morin
Da
32 matches
Mail list logo
