https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109741
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94a311abf783de754f0f1b2d4c1f00a9788e795b
commit r14-918-g94a311abf783de754f0f1b2d4c1f00a9788e795b
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97048
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Tony, this is just a meta-bug that has links to the real bugs. Please either
add that as a comment to an existing bug (if it's the same as one of them) or
file a new bug (and set "Blocks: 97048" so that it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109873
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97048
Tony Guilfoyle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tonyguil at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick O'Neill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55088cf384d4c43e280ec794217e32fab64070ba
commit r13-7336-g55088cf384d4c43e280ec794217e32fab64070ba
Author: Patrick
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109871
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.2
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109871
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5e5007c4b534391c0a97be56f6024fde1a88682
commit r14-917-gd5e5007c4b534391c0a97be56f6024fde1a88682
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109860
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55056|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107801
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107801
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23e12322bc03065557d9c0ee238b5b8d7b605c02
commit r11-10777-g23e12322bc03065557d9c0ee238b5b8d7b605c02
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36603
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||*-mingw* *-cygwin*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109865
--- Comment #9 from GARY.WHITE at ColoState dot edu ---
Another clue. I'm seeing the same bug in gfortran-13, except that I have to
use -O0 for both cases of mc11ad.f90 in or out of the contains statement.
Similarly, if I put the set of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109866
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109868
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> Created attachment 55092 [details]
> gcc14-pr109868.patch
>
> I think the FE shouldn't initialize those, rather than gimplifier fixing it
> up later.
> In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107801
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6baa800897728fac40fc7153facaf3c7541ff3f
commit r12-9541-ge6baa800897728fac40fc7153facaf3c7541ff3f
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109858
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
> The patch will still use GENERAL_REGS when hard_regno_mode_ok for mode and
> GENERAL_REGS(which is the case in PR109610), hope it can also fix this
> regression.
That sounds more reasonable. But,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108344
--- Comment #5 from Gaius Mulley ---
On reflection I suspect it is doubtful this is the same bug. However it might
reduce the timeouts when running the regression tests.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104875
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108118
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108265
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108344
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-05-16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108344
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf4dcfa6727b89362494bd49e2a28ebd10d767ce
commit r14-912-gcf4dcfa6727b89362494bd49e2a28ebd10d767ce
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109871
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109871
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109861
Scot Breitenfeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109861
--- Comment #6 from Scot Breitenfeld ---
Thanks for the standard reference. That is indeed what I was looking for. I
understand now that, in this case, the INTENT refers to whether C_PTR can be
changed and does not relate to the INTENT state of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99982
--- Comment #11 from Scot Breitenfeld ---
Thanks for the standard reference. That is indeed what I was looking for. I
understand now that, in this case, the INTENT refers to whether C_PTR can be
changed and does not relate to the INTENT state of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107801
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:047c0fae82ca1458339e7e9724d125d30b685898
commit r11-10776-g047c0fae82ca1458339e7e9724d125d30b685898
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91456
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c02a8eca7bcbe0ee021eddd5f764e8bfcb13b03
commit r11-10775-g5c02a8eca7bcbe0ee021eddd5f764e8bfcb13b03
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104875
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4b0d0b84b719ea9cd3d0a7b0668cdd8055a07d2
commit r11-10770-ge4b0d0b84b719ea9cd3d0a7b0668cdd8055a07d2
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108265
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:126ffcee89cf3f252c0c89125a64fbe1b0b9255e
commit r11-10767-g126ffcee89cf3f252c0c89125a64fbe1b0b9255e
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108118
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9578570e305e77b8c105583506781158c137f743
commit r11-10768-g9578570e305e77b8c105583506781158c137f743
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109790
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109781
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
Summary|erroneous
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109874
--- Comment #1 from Marc Poulhiès ---
Forcing GCC 13 to emit non-PIC (as gcc4) code shaves a few insns, down to 28.
```
_SetupCartCHRMapping:
mov r4,r1
mov.l .L3,r2
shlr8 r1
shlr2 r1
add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109857
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> This would be bad in the Debian case, because they backport changes to the
> DST rules from the upstream IANA database, but for Debian stable don't
> change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109857
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> We should also consider ignoring the system tzdata files if the bundled copy
> (currently 2023c) is newer.
This would be bad in the Debian case, because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713
--- Comment #10 from James Addison ---
Hi folks,
Re-stating and confirming the bugreport details here: both gcc-11 (11.3.0) and
gcc-12 (12.2.0) emit bytecode instructions that aren't supported on all
i686-architecture CPUs.
This comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109874
Bug ID: 109874
Summary: [SH] GCC 13's -Os code is 50% bigger than GCC 4's
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109866
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #0)
> > Take:
> > ```
> > int g(void); int h(void); int t(void);
> > int f(int a, int b)
> > {
> > int c = a - b;
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109570
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://sourceware.org/pipe |https://sourceware.org/git/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109241
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lozko.roma at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109872
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99417
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fb7d49b3c7129fa8a6b500f260abc642929361b
commit r13-7335-g7fb7d49b3c7129fa8a6b500f260abc642929361b
Author: Tobias Burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109872
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109873
Bug ID: 109873
Summary: internal compiler error: gfc_get_symbol_decl 内、位置
fortran/trans-decl.c:1587 0x6b4c13
gfc_get_symbol_decl(gfc_symbol*)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109866
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
A small improvement would be:
subl%esi, %edi
je .L5
testl %edi, %edi
jle .L3
jmp h()
.L3:
jmp t()
.L5:
jmp g()
Not to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109872
Bug ID: 109872
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE on valid C++ code
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109868
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 55092
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55092=edit
gcc14-pr109868.patch
I think the FE shouldn't initialize those, rather than gimplifier fixing it up
later.
In fact,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109866
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #0)
> Take:
> ```
> int g(void); int h(void); int t(void);
> int f(int a, int b)
> {
> int c = a - b;
> if(c == 0)
> return g();
> if (c > 0)
> return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Another possibility would be pick up one runtest (e.g. the first one using
O_EXCL which creates some file) and let it perform all executions from that
point on instead of doing the compilations, where the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #14 from Thomas Schwinge ---
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12)
>> Note that there's a gnulib module for flock:
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109871
Bug ID: 109871
Summary: error: call of overloaded ... ambiguous (std::vector
vs designated initializers)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
101 - 157 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
