https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99403
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-08-07
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94427
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4)
> It is the same loop - it was float only in my mind (since the function
> return float value :)
>
> With loop splitting we no longer have the last iteration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94427
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
It is the same loop - it was float only in my mind (since the function return
float value :)
With loop splitting we no longer have the last iteration check, but we still
have the underflow checks that are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110897
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to JuzheZhong from comment #18)
> (In reply to JuzheZhong from comment #17)
> > Confirm by this try:
> > https://godbolt.org/z/q7zx5zG5e
> >
> > Both ARM SVE trunk GCC and RISC-V GCC failed to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94427
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110841
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110619
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Fedor Chelnokov from comment #8)
> This program must be rejected because of relational comparison of unrelated
> pointers
I disagree. If GCC were to define the behaviour of returning invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49955
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110503
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110361
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-08-07
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110898
--- Comment #3 from Marc Poulhiès ---
Yes, I was confused also, as I've never seen this issue when using alire.
Maybe check that your alr install is up to date, and if it's the case, report
an issue in the corresponding project:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106293
--- Comment #27 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:73c14db6d1a8c1267137b94c41f2e2c9410dcbb1
commit r14-3015-g73c14db6d1a8c1267137b94c41f2e2c9410dcbb1
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108360
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is the example code which is not optimized at the gimple level (but is at
the RTL level):
```
void gg();
void hh();
void f1(int a, int b)
{
short t = a == b;
t -= 1;
unsigned t1 = t;
if (t1 <=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105832
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110899
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-* aarch64-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2007-07-01 00:14:40 |2023-8-7
--- Comment #7 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20084
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18940
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26731
Bug 26731 depends on bug 18940, which changed state.
Bug 18940 Summary: Loop is not vectorized when it should be (VRP)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18940
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110619
--- Comment #8 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
Please note that GCC 13 also accepts invalid program (because dangling pointers
were converted in nullptr):
constexpr auto f(int a) {
return
}
constexpr auto g(int b) {
return
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110924
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C code is
func_4_p_7, func_4_l_3204;
func_15() __attribute__((cold));
func_15() {
for (;;)
;
}
func_15_alias() __attribute__((alias("func_15")));
func_4() {
func_15_alias(func_4_p_7 &&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 96695, which changed state.
Bug 96695 Summary: Failure to optimize combination of pointer comparison to
nullptr and another pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96695
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96695
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58f1e185ff6d108171b9c8ea043796c85a65fcec
commit r14-3014-g58f1e185ff6d108171b9c8ea043796c85a65fcec
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110929
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110924
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110929
Bug ID: 110929
Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed since r14-2946-g46c8c225455
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110924
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110924
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28794
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55700
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55700=edit
Patch, still needs testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103281
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103281
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||28794
--- Comment #10 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28794
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Andrew
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
