[Bug libstdc++/111258] std::string cannot to be moved in constant evaluated expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111258 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid --- Comment #1 from

[Bug target/111232] RISC-V: Failed to combine vwmul + vadd into vwmacc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111232 --- Comment #1 from Lehua Ding --- reproduce on compiler explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/Mq3bzajn6

[Bug target/110484] Spec2017 541 after adding the '-flto-fomit-frame-pointer' optimization, after optimizing the rnreg, directly replaced other registers with the $r22 register, so that the value of t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110484 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by LuluCheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d60c00492eb5818493560f299f06d1e3d9efcc69 commit r12-9840-gd60c00492eb5818493560f299f06d1e3d9efcc69 Author: Lulu Cheng Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/111262] [14 Regression] error: count of bb not initialized with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111262 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/111262] [14 Regression] error: count of bb not initialized with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111262 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Version|unknown

[Bug other/111264] [14 regression] gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c breaks after r14-3580-g597b9ec69bca8a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111264 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/111264] [14 regression] gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c breaks after r14-3580-g597b9ec69bca8a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111264 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug target/110484] Spec2017 541 after adding the '-flto-fomit-frame-pointer' optimization, after optimizing the rnreg, directly replaced other registers with the $r22 register, so that the value of t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110484 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by LuluCheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f23fa7e74fa01828d649e8ee7230701b6fb1e19 commit r13-7773-g3f23fa7e74fa01828d649e8ee7230701b6fb1e19 Author: Lulu Cheng Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/107137] (unsigned)-(int)(bool_var) should be optimized to -(unsigned)bool_var

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107137 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug tree-optimization/107765] missing (int)-(unsigned)int_val to just -int_val if int_val is known not to contain INT_MIN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107765 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug c++/110936] if constexpr: member function pointers cannot be checked with ubsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110936 --- Comment #2 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- FWIW, it seems that you can use to test the validity during constant evaluation. It seems that an invalid constant

[Bug target/110484] Spec2017 541 after adding the '-flto-fomit-frame-pointer' optimization, after optimizing the rnreg, directly replaced other registers with the $r22 register, so that the value of t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110484 chenglulu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/111264] [14 regression] gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c breaks after r14-3580-g597b9ec69bca8a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111264 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/110484] Spec2017 541 after adding the '-flto-fomit-frame-pointer' optimization, after optimizing the rnreg, directly replaced other registers with the $r22 register, so that the value of t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110484 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by LuluCheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1967f21d000e09d3d3190317af7923b578ce02b1 commit r14-3605-g1967f21d000e09d3d3190317af7923b578ce02b1 Author: Lulu Cheng Date: Thu Jun

[Bug c++/110936] if constexpr: member function pointers cannot be checked with ubsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110936 --- Comment #1 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- This should block BUG101603.

[Bug other/111264] New: [14 regression] gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c breaks after r14-3580-g597b9ec69bca8a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111264 Bug ID: 111264 Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/plugin/analyzer_cpython_plugin.c breaks after r14-3580-g597b9ec69bca8a Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug c++/66487] sanitizer/warnings for lifetime DSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/109751] [13/14 Regression] boost iterator_interface fails concept check starting in gcc-13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109751 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/109751] [13/14 Regression] boost iterator_interface fails concept check starting in gcc-13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109751 --- Comment #25 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6396e37d451b2ef6d3cb9c11edbc06deeaccd808 commit r13-7771-g6396e37d451b2ef6d3cb9c11edbc06deeaccd808 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/92407] Destruction of objects returned from functions skipped by goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92407 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a645347c19b07cc7abd7bf276c6769fc41afc932 commit r13-7770-ga645347c19b07cc7abd7bf276c6769fc41afc932 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug target/111263] test case gfortran.dg/ieee/comparisons_3.F90 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111263 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Component|other

[Bug other/111263] New: test case gfortran.dg/ieee/comparisons_3.F90 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111263 Bug ID: 111263 Summary: test case gfortran.dg/ieee/comparisons_3.F90 fails Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/111262] error: count of bb not initialized with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111262 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Reduced C++ code is struct _Rb_tree_header { int _M_node_count; }; struct _Rb_tree { _Rb_tree_header _M_impl; bool empty() { return _M_impl._M_node_count; } }; struct Trans_NS_std_map { _Rb_tree

[Bug target/111246] PPC64 Sequentially Consistent Load allows Reordering of Stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111246 --- Comment #18 from Luke Geeson --- Indeed that is a plus - I have 167k concurrency tests that I feed through LLVM/GCC -O1/2/3/fast and for GCC -Og that test compilation from the C/C++ to PPC memory models. If you are interested I can provide

[Bug target/111246] PPC64 Sequentially Consistent Load allows Reordering of Stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111246 --- Comment #17 from David Edelsohn --- I'm glad that we have confirmed that the GCC and LLVM code generation for PowerPC are correct for the memory model. And now your translation tool is more accurate.

[Bug target/111246] PPC64 Sequentially Consistent Load allows Reordering of Stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111246 Luke Geeson changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug target/111246] PPC64 Sequentially Consistent Load allows Reordering of Stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111246 --- Comment #15 from Luke Geeson --- I am sorry to you all - I have wasted your time. It was a bug in the translation tool. In the future I will make absolutely sure that I check everything before submitting a bug - this is an embarrassing

[Bug c++/111262] New: error: count of bb not initialized with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111262 Bug ID: 111262 Summary: error: count of bb not initialized with -O3 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/31059] bounds-check does not detect nonconforming assignment arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/110997] [13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:8005

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/111261] New: No warning for out of order class initialisation when using class initialisers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111261 Bug ID: 111261 Summary: No warning for out of order class initialisation when using class initialisers Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/31059] bounds-check does not detect nonconforming assignment arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #55821|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/111246] PPC64 Sequentially Consistent Load allows Reordering of Stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111246 --- Comment #14 from David Edelsohn --- The conditional branch always will proceed to the next instruction, so the code that you showed in the PR is a correct "optimization" of the original code, but the processor does execute the conditional

[Bug tree-optimization/108397] Missed optimization with [0, 0][-1U,-1U] range arithmetics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108397 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > Forwprop will not change _4 to _1 though. because t1_11 is used twice. But combined with PR 107137, we are able to optimize it just fine.

[Bug target/111246] PPC64 Sequentially Consistent Load allows Reordering of Stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111246 --- Comment #13 from Luke Geeson --- Please bear with me whilst I figure out what has happened here.

[Bug target/111246] PPC64 Sequentially Consistent Load allows Reordering of Stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111246 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Luke Geeson from comment #11) > Do you have a trunk build of binutils to hand to test? Godbolt doesn't > support objdump. I will try to install binutils from source to reproduce. Yes it does.

[Bug target/111246] PPC64 Sequentially Consistent Load allows Reordering of Stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111246 --- Comment #11 from Luke Geeson --- I'm using `powerpc64le-linux-gnu-objdump -Dr --disassemble --section=.text --no-show-raw-insn`. installed using `binutils-powerpc64le-linux-gnu` under Ubuntu 20:04 (in a docker container running on an Arm

[Bug fortran/110987] Segmentation fault after finalization of a temporary variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110987 --- Comment #2 from Kirill Chilikin --- Some additional information: $ gfortran -g -o test test.f90 -fdump-tree-original $ cat test.f90.005t.original | head -n 747 | tail -n 26 { struct t3 zero.25; struct array00_t3 desc.26;

[Bug target/111260] New: arm: ice in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.cc:8054

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111260 Bug ID: 111260 Summary: arm: ice in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.cc:8054 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/107765] missing (int)-(unsigned)int_val to just -int_val if int_val is known not to contain INT_MIN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107765 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/107137] (unsigned)-(int)(bool_var) should be optimized to -(unsigned)bool_var

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107137 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/111246] PPC64 Sequentially Consistent Load allows Reordering of Stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111246 --- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn --- If I compile your testcase with either GCC 11.3 or GCC trunk, GCC produces P1: .LFB1: .cfi_startproc .localentry P1,1 pld 9,.LANCHOR0+8@pcrel sync lwz 9,0(9)

[Bug target/111259] [14 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1934 during riscv64 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111259 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug target/111259] New: [14 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1934 during riscv64 build

disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r14-3602-20230831181644-ga335cf241b9-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-riscv64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 14.0.0 20230831 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/111246] PPC64 Sequentially Consistent Load allows Reordering of Stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111246 --- Comment #9 from Luke Geeson --- apologies typos: bc -> bee bee -> beq

[Bug target/111246] PPC64 Sequentially Consistent Load allows Reordering of Stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111246 --- Comment #8 from Luke Geeson --- I have not, but I will contact him and link this discussion. In the meantime, I read that page and provide some more testing. Consider the passage: ``` bc;isync: this is a very low-overhead and very weak form

[Bug tree-optimization/19832] don't remove an if when we know the value is the same as with the if (subtraction)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19832 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- Patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/628995.html

[Bug middle-end/111243] The -Og option inlines functions, making for a poor debugging experience.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111243 --- Comment #2 from Alex Mohr --- Thanks much for looking at this, Richard. I definitely understand what you're driving at with regard to stepping into lots of C++ abstraction stuff. But I think it gets blurry trying to distinguish what's

[Bug tree-optimization/110915] vector version of `x == MIN & x > y` is not optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110915 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/110915] vector version of `x == MIN & x > y` is not optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110915 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16a268785f646b3d641acd8634ab487b24f51c33 commit r14-3603-g16a268785f646b3d641acd8634ab487b24f51c33 Author: Andrew Pinski Date:

[Bug middle-end/111156] [14 Regression] aarch64 aarch64/sve/mask_struct_store_4.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56 Adhemerval Zanella changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/99711] Crash when reading an allocated character array in namelist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99711 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.2.0, 14.0

[Bug fortran/99711] Crash when reading an allocated character array in namelist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99711 --- Comment #19 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 12:58:15PM +, philippe.wautelet at aero dot obs-mip.fr wrote: > > What is the status of this bug? > > It seems that it is not present any more in the 12.x and 13.x GCC versions.

[Bug gcov-profile/110827] C++20 coroutines aren't being measured by gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110827 --- Comment #9 from Michael Duggan --- More data: The coroutine actor is marked as artificial in coro_build_actor_or_destroy_function. As a result, it is completely ignored by gcov. In gcov's process_all_functions function, artificial

[Bug target/111246] PPC64 Sequentially Consistent Load allows Reordering of Stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111246 --- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn --- Have you reached out to Paul McKenney (now at Meta) who suggested the instruction sequences to implement the C/C++ memory for PowerPC? https://open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2745.html

[Bug testsuite/111216] [14 regression] instructions counts for vector tests change after r14-3258-ge7a36e4715c716

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111216 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/111228] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-extract-6.c fails after r14-3381-g27de9aa152141e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111228 --- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #7) > The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : Bah, wrong PR#, Sorry! :-(

[Bug testsuite/111228] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-extract-6.c fails after r14-3381-g27de9aa152141e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111228 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80277e18e1a77b68f938b605c3ecd2750194ed75 commit r14-3598-g80277e18e1a77b68f938b605c3ecd2750194ed75 Author: Peter Bergner Date:

[Bug libstdc++/111258] New: std::string cannot to be moved in constant evaluated expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111258 Bug ID: 111258 Summary: std::string cannot to be moved in constant evaluated expression Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/111246] PPC64 Sequentially Consistent Load allows Reordering of Stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111246 --- Comment #6 from Luke Geeson --- Apologies - I've been thinking in syncs and fences too much! Yes I mean `lwsync`, for clarity I repeat the above so you know it is the correct fix: ``` lukegeeson@machine:~/Dev/tv-dev/herdtools7$ cat

[Bug target/111246] PPC64 Sequentially Consistent Load allows Reordering of Stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111246 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/111247] Very confusing diagnostic when attempting to initialize an incomplete type: "too many initializers"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111247 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/111257] new signed overflow after vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111257 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/111163] signed integer overflow in std::format("{:%S}",std::chrono::duration....)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- With this patch: --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/chrono_io.h +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/chrono_io.h @@ -507,6 +507,16 @@ namespace __format if constexpr (__is_specialization_of<_Tp,

[Bug middle-end/111253] [11/12/13 Regression] Dodgy pointer name (*_42 = PHI ...) in -Wfree-nonheap-object diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111253 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Summary|[11/12/13/14

[Bug fortran/106065] Crash when reading extended derived type array in namelist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106065 philippe.wautelet at aero dot obs-mip.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Version|12.1.0 |13.2.0 ---

[Bug middle-end/111253] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Dodgy pointer name (*_42 = PHI ...) in -Wfree-nonheap-object diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111253 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3ece7684b02c47d2b259899cf8009d6bdcccaf3 commit r14-3595-ge3ece7684b02c47d2b259899cf8009d6bdcccaf3 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug middle-end/111241] Extraordinary amount of time spent in "callgraph functions expansion"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111241 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Samples: 121K of event 'cycles:u', Event count (approx.): 159788164341 Overhead Samples Command Shared Object Symbol 21.24% 25791 cc1 cc1

[Bug fortran/99711] Crash when reading an allocated character array in namelist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99711 --- Comment #18 from philippe.wautelet at aero dot obs-mip.fr --- Hello, What is the status of this bug? It seems that it is not present any more in the 12.x and 13.x GCC versions. 11.4 does not crash but gives incorrect results.

[Bug middle-end/111253] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Dodgy pointer name (*_42 = PHI ...) in -Wfree-nonheap-object diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111253 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/67729] -Wformat should warn for %Ns where the buffer size is known to be less than N in size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67729 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- I just noticed that clang-16.0.6 now implements this check: $ clang++ -c -g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wformat=2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 sep9a.cc sep9a.cc:13:29: warning: 'fscanf' may overflow; destination buffer in

[Bug tree-optimization/111257] New: new signed overflow after vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111257 Bug ID: 111257 Summary: new signed overflow after vectorizer Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/102610] [C++23] P2036R3 - Change scope of lambda trailing-return-type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102610 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/111253] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Dodgy pointer name (*_42 = PHI ...) in -Wfree-nonheap-object diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111253 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 111254 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 111254, which changed state. Bug 111254 Summary: Dodgy variable name (*_11 = PHI <_1(25), _25(23)>.CargoPacket::Pool...) in -Wmaybe-uninitialized https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111254 What

[Bug middle-end/111254] Dodgy variable name (*_11 = PHI <_1(25), _25(23)>.CargoPacket::Pool...) in -Wmaybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111254 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/111253] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Dodgy pointer name (*_42 = PHI ...) in -Wfree-nonheap-object diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111253 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Dodgy pointer name (*_42 = |[11/12/13/14 Regression]

[Bug middle-end/111253] Dodgy pointer name (*_42 = PHI ...) in -Wfree-nonheap-object diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111253 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/111249] [12/13 Regression] Aggressive loop optimization reports "iteration 2147483645 invokes undefined behavior"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111249 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||13.2.1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/110411] ICE on simple memcpy test case when allowing generation of vector pair load/store insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110411 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by jeevitha : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ea1248604d7b65009af32103814332f35bd33e2 commit r14-3592-g9ea1248604d7b65009af32103814332f35bd33e2 Author: Jeevitha Date: Thu Aug 31

[Bug ipa/111245] [12/13/14 Regression] miscompilation: missing assignment when exception thrown since r12-5244-g64f3e71c302b4a13e61656ee509e7050b9bce978

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111245 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/111243] The -Og option inlines functions, making for a poor debugging experience.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111243 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |13.2.1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/111218] Conflict in BIND(C) INTERFACEs in two Modules leads to ICE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111218 Rimvydas (RJ) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/111241] Extraordinary amount of time spent in "callgraph functions expansion"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111241 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/111240] [12/13/14 Regression] Incorrect warning from -Wmaybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111240 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.4.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/102609] [C++23] P0847R7 - Deducing this

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102609 --- Comment #17 from Gašper Ažman --- Read through the patch quickly, want to suggest a few tests. When a lambda has captures, the explicit object parameter is used to get at them *silently*, if they are related, otherwise the program is

[Bug libstdc++/111129] std::regex incorrectly matches quantifiers with plus appended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- I have a patch to reject "a++" and "a**" but it doesn't work for "a+?" which is invalid for POSIX REs, but valid for ECMAScript.

[Bug c/111256] Wrong code at -O2/3/s since r10-1615-g75efe9cb1f8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111256 --- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoyao --- If you don't have Clang, you can also reproduce the timeout with -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero or -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern (in GCC 12 or later).

[Bug c/111256] Wrong code at -O2/3/s since r10-1615-g75efe9cb1f8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111256 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/111256] New: Wrong code at -O2/3/s since r10-1615-g75efe9cb1f8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111256 Bug ID: 111256 Summary: Wrong code at -O2/3/s since r10-1615-g75efe9cb1f8 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/111254] Dodgy variable name (*_11 = PHI <_1(25), _25(23)>.CargoPacket::Pool...) in -Wmaybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111254 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- sorry, wrong output: ``` [...] In static member function ‘static void Pool::PoolItem::operator delete(void*) [with Pool* Tpool = (& _cargopacket_pool); Titem = CargoPacket; Tindex = unsigned int; long unsigned

[Bug target/103784] suboptimal code for returning bool value on target ppc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103784 --- Comment #16 from Ajit Kumar Agarwal --- This patch https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/624751.html removes the zero extension from the below testcase that has different cfg, My patch is not based on any CFG shape but it is

[Bug tree-optimization/52252] An opportunity for x86 gcc vectorizer (gain up to 3 times)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52252 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/111253] Dodgy pointer name (*_42 = PHI ...) in -Wfree-nonheap-object diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111253 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Created attachment 55825 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55825=edit reduced.i

[Bug target/111255] New: RISC-V: Miss combine two vsetvl insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111255 Bug ID: 111255 Summary: RISC-V: Miss combine two vsetvl insns Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c++/102609] [C++23] P0847R7 - Deducing this

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102609 --- Comment #16 from waffl3x --- Just gotta note that the patch posted here had an oversight, it never worked as I hoped. The good news is, I submitted a finalized patch to the patch maillist, just before I have to leave. Thanks for the help

[Bug target/111231] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O1 is working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111231 --- Comment #4 from Mathieu Malaterre --- Intermediate result (creduce Debian/sid): #include "hwy/tests/test_util-inl.h" namespace hwy { namespace HWY_NAMESPACE { struct a { template void operator()(b, c d) { using e = MakeUnsigned;

[Bug middle-end/111254] Dodgy variable name (*_11 = PHI <_1(25), _25(23)>.CargoPacket::Pool...) in -Wmaybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111254 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- I have a few more of these in clang and qt* but I figure this is a smaller test case. Can report the others if needed though.

[Bug middle-end/111254] New: Dodgy variable name (*_11 = PHI <_1(25), _25(23)>.CargoPacket::Pool...) in -Wmaybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111254 Bug ID: 111254 Summary: Dodgy variable name (*_11 = PHI <_1(25), _25(23)>.CargoPacket::Pool...) in -Wmaybe-uninitialized Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug tree-optimization/105490] unvectorized loop due to bool condition loaded from memory and different size data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105490 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 30 Aug 2023, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105490 > > --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- > Here is an even odder case: > ``` >

  1   2   >