https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110983
--- Comment #6 from Mao ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Mao from comment #3)
> > Created attachment 55810 [details]
> > invoke-doc-patch
> >
> > I think this can help fix the issue.
> > I am not sure how to build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111451
Bug ID: 111451
Summary: RISC-V: Missed optimization of vrgather.vv into
vrgatherei16.vv
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111450
Bug ID: 111450
Summary: RISC-V: Missed optimized for strided load/store with
stride = element width
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111424
--- Comment #1 from Chenghui Pan ---
I also addressed some failed testcases with -mlsx/-mlasx enabled and try to
resolve them by adding dg-options and etc. or editing target-supports.exp to
append loongarch directives. (May submit to maillist
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111367
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111367
--- Comment #6 from Kewen Lin ---
Created attachment 55919
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55919=edit
tested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111303
--- Comment #9 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #7) this comment should be linked to
PR111324.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111449
Bug ID: 111449
Summary: memcmp (p,q,16) == 0 can be optimized better on ppc64
with vector comparison instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111324
--- Comment #7 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
A comment https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111303#c7
should be attached here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111303
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111324
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111303
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jiu Fu Guo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55b22a6f630e76a0be913ced8bf1b017eaffd89b
commit r14-4082-g55b22a6f630e76a0be913ced8bf1b017eaffd89b
Author: Jiufu Guo
Date: Wed Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111448
--- Comment #2 from Levi Zim ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I suspect this is a dup of bug 110315. It works on the trunk but fails on
> 13.2.0 even on x86_64-linux-gnu.
I tested it with gcc 13.1.1 and gcc 12.3.0.
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110386
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111448
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111448
Bug ID: 111448
Summary: g++ ICE Segmentation fault in qemu-riscv64-static
emulator
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111442
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111436
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Please re-read the notice that was shown before you created this bug:
"Before reporting a bug, please read the bug writing guidelines, please look at
the list of most frequently reported bugs, and please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111383
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||110233
--- Comment #5 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111365
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.0|13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111365
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111382
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111427
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |middle-end
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 111447, which changed state.
Bug 111447 Summary: Program crashes when an include is present in global module
fragment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111447
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99569
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adamstepniak41 at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111447
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111447
Bug ID: 111447
Summary: Program crashes when an include is present in global
module fragment
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81114
--- Comment #6 from simon at pushface dot org ---
(In reply to simon from comment #1)
> Further:
>
> $ GNAT_FILE_NAME_CASE_SENSITIVE=1 gnatmake -c p*.ads
> gcc -c páck3.ads
> páck3.ads:1:10: warning: file name does not match unit name, should be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108143
--- Comment #10 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 55917
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55917=edit
Work in progress fix
Here is a patch set (which needs some tidying up). It introduces a configure
for LONGREAL as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111446
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111446
Bug ID: 111446
Summary: genmatch should warn/error out on recusive match
patterns
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111043
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
A third reproducer, with -O3 required:
long g_18;
int g_170, g_759, g_1114;
extern void safe_lshift_func_uint64_t_u_u();
void func_35() {
int __trans_tmp_1;
for (; g_759 >= 0; g_759 = g_759 -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 94920, which changed state.
Bug 94920 Summary: Failure to optimize abs pattern from arithmetic with
selected operands based on comparisons with 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94920
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94920
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111444
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111445
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wrong code at -Os on|[12/13/14 Regression] Wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111435
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111443
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86030
--- Comment #19 from John Soo ---
I verified the proposed patch sent argv through @file, but COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS
still caused E2BIG. In the failing execve, COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS was 134227
characters long.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111445
Bug ID: 111445
Summary: Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since
r12-1077-g57bf3751511
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111444
Bug ID: 111444
Summary: Wrong code at -O2/3/s on x86_64-gnu since
r14-3226-gd073e2d75d9
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111443
Bug ID: 111443
Summary: ICE : Segmentation fault signal terminated program
since r14-4038-gb975c0dc3be
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111435
--- Comment #10 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
The proposed patch fixes my modified i686-linux gcc bootstrap as well. Thank
you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111441
--- Comment #3 from mengli ming ---
Um..regarding the warning about "stack-based buffer over-read", it's a FP.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111441
--- Comment #2 from mengli ming ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Created attachment 55916 [details]
> testcase
>
> Please next time attach or place the testcase inline instead of just linking
> to godbolt .
Thanks for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111442
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on valid code at|[14 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111441
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55916
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55916=edit
testcase
Please next time attach or place the testcase inline instead of just linking to
godbolt .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111442
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
What I meant was the match for bit_and case has the same issue as convert.
Though I can't don't understand exactly how though but basically any match
can't be recusive after all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111442
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111435
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111442
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111440
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Lénárd Szolnoki from comment #3)
> Note that GCC seems to implement CWG2352 outside of ternary operators.
Yes that was done in GCC 10 (see PR 91844).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111217
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111440
--- Comment #3 from Lénárd Szolnoki ---
Note that GCC seems to implement CWG2352 outside of ternary operators.
https://godbolt.org/z/rnMcPqE7b
```
template
void foo();
bool bar() {
int * ptr = nullptr;
const int * const = ptr;
=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 14.0.0 20230917 (experimental) (GCC)
[543] %
[543] % gcctk -Os small.c
small.c: In function ‘main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111217
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This works on the trunk at -O2 now (after r14-3982-g9ea74d235c7e78). But it
still fails at -O1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111441
Bug ID: 111441
Summary: internal compiler error: in fold_binary_loc, at
fold-const.cc:11580
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79045
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fent at in dot tum.de
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105670
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111440
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang change:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f041e9ad706aee7987c5299427c33424fcabbd0d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111440
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note clang changed between version 9 and 10 for the defect report it seems ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111440
Bug ID: 111440
Summary: wrong-code for ternary with reference-compatible
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111437
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111437
zxuiji changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from zxuiji ---
(In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96487
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111437
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111437
--- Comment #3 from zxuiji ---
(In reply to zxuiji from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > Can you attach the preprocessed source where the warning is and the exact
> > command line you are using to invoke gcc?
> >
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111437
--- Comment #2 from zxuiji ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Can you attach the preprocessed source where the warning is and the exact
> command line you are using to invoke gcc?
>
> I suspect the issue is that the function can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111439
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111439
Bug ID: 111439
Summary: some boolean related transformation to `~(a)`
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109986
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 109986, which changed state.
Bug 109986 Summary: missing fold (~a | b) ^ a => ~(a & b)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109986
What|Removed |Added
73 matches
Mail list logo
