https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71219
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110785
Amatul Adeeba changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amatuladeeba at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111468
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111468
Bug ID: 111468
Summary: cannot express unordered equal in gimple FE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111467
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106164
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #19)
> Another integer testcase which is missed here:
> ```
> _Bool f(int a)
> {
> _Bool t = a == 0;
> unsigned t1 = a;
> _Bool t2 = t1 >= 3;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111456
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55929
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55929=edit
Patch which I am testing
I still need to add testcases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111367
--- Comment #10 from Kewen Lin ---
Thanks for both of your comments!
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #8)
> Mike will know better than I, but I like the idea of the patch!
Looking forward to Mike's reply. :)
(In reply to Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86030
--- Comment #20 from John Soo ---
I think that in order to really rid gcc of the E2BIG problem on linux,
COLLECT_*_OPTIONS will have to be deprecated and removed. This is particularly
a problem when executing spec files, it seems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111456
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
here is another missed optimization:
```
_Bool f2(int a, int b)
{
_Bool t = a == b;
unsigned t1 = a;
unsigned t2 = b;
_Bool b2 = t1 >= t2;
return t & b2;
}
```
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106164
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111454
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111435
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110992
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111456
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase for the missed optimization before and after the patch:
```
_Bool f(int a)
{
_Bool t = a == 0;
short t1 = a;
_Bool t2 = t1 >= 0;
return t & t2;
}
```
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
```
Optimizing block #15
1>>> STMT 1 = prephitmp_58 le_expr location_138
1>>> STMT 1 = prephitmp_58 ge_expr location_138
1>>> STMT 1 = prephitmp_58 eq_expr location_138
1>>> STMT 0 = prephitmp_58 ne_expr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55928
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55928=edit
Reduced even further
Still requires `-O2 -fno-exceptions --param=logical-op-non-short-circuit=0` to
reproduce.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111467
--- Comment #1 from Vineet Gupta ---
(insn 8 4 11 2 (set (reg:SI 15 a5 [orig:137 b ] [137]) <--- DEF #1
(reg:SI 11 a1 [orig:136 b ] [136])) "max.c":12:20 207 {*movsi_internal}
(nil))
(jump_insn 11 8 22 2 (set (pc)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109882
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Resubmitted now that LLVM uses github pull requests:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66628
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55927
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55927=edit
reduced somewhat
Compile with `-O2 -fno-exceptions`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111467
Bug ID: 111467
Summary: REE failing to eliminate redundant extension due to
multiple reaching def(s)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111466
Bug ID: 111466
Summary: RISC-V: redundant sign extensions despite ABI
guarantees
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reproduced, reducing ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 55926
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55926=edit
preprocessed .ii file
Yup, that looks like the culprit.
Preprocessed file attached.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #10 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111446
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Note originally I intended to have (match (...)) inlined in the match IL
> itself,
> so any such checking should not only check for direct recursion but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111464
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also see
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/20230201073859.3920910-1-mask...@google.com/
The original patch which uses DW_EH_PE_udata4 :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |tree-optimization
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111435
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111442
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111442
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ea501d3ea698e1c845fb61e3487f4cd949e6253
commit r14-4114-g7ea501d3ea698e1c845fb61e3487f4cd949e6253
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111446
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ea501d3ea698e1c845fb61e3487f4cd949e6253
commit r14-4114-g7ea501d3ea698e1c845fb61e3487f4cd949e6253
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111435
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:951d3c191d01440ad54415f683437770b0c957e4
commit r14-4113-g951d3c191d01440ad54415f683437770b0c957e4
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70231
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111465
Bug ID: 111465
Summary: [14 regression] stage 3 ICE kills bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70231
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63198
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18474
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89231
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111399
--- Comment #2 from David Brown ---
Would it be possible to have the "-Wreturn-type" warning pass not issue a
warning immediately, but inject a warning into the code that could then be
removed later by optimisation?
What I mean, is to have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89231
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80968d5f4683ffb50dbe8051d10f754d5fd00dfb
commit r14-4112-g80968d5f4683ffb50dbe8051d10f754d5fd00dfb
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63198
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e92a6a2a72d3b7a5e1b29042d8a6a43fe1085aa
commit r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b7a5e1b29042d8a6a43fe1085aa
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18474
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e92a6a2a72d3b7a5e1b29042d8a6a43fe1085aa
commit r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b7a5e1b29042d8a6a43fe1085aa
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108347
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108347
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6ac1fc64c3caed19da65c2e6b12f8ddaf551231
commit r14-4110-ga6ac1fc64c3caed19da65c2e6b12f8ddaf551231
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84075
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:155178ccb5f5bc89dcc8261ae1b64bc2fbfdbd45
commit r14-4109-g155178ccb5f5bc89dcc8261ae1b64bc2fbfdbd45
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111464
Bug ID: 111464
Summary: Using DW_EH_PE_udata4 for amd64 non-pic breaks linking
in some situations
Product: gcc
Version: 9.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111463
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111463
Bug ID: 111463
Summary: Access error in instantiation of template class,
incorrectly using inherited constructor of wrong type
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also this one:
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "Invalid sum"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |testsuite
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111367
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I don't like that "wzd" attribute at all. Please just put an "if" for the mode
around this -- everywhere else (including in a large part of this patch!) we
deal with SImode and DImode separately
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111462
Bug ID: 111462
Summary: [14 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-sink-18.c fails
after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111461
Bug ID: 111461
Summary: [14.0 Regression] RISC-V rv32gc bootstrap ICEs with
--enable-checking=rtl
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111055
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111367
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|g...@the-meissners.org |meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111460
Bug ID: 111460
Summary: -fdiagnostics-generate-patch=/out.diff to specify
patch output destination file
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111448
--- Comment #4 from Levi Zim ---
I tested it on gcc's latest commit(5b4acfa306d53c8473883552f1db7278b7065b18).
It doesn't trigger the ICE.
However, I do have another source file that still triggers the ICE with gcc's
latest commit. It is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111431
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111431
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fb828af75732d39c644fd145c29d41ca14b8cb1
commit r14-4105-g0fb828af75732d39c644fd145c29d41ca14b8cb1
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111458
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.1.0, 11.4.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111459
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111459
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111459
Bug ID: 111459
Summary: DSE after deleting trivial dead statements sometimes
should do a cfgcleanup
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111458
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55922
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55922=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111458
Bug ID: 111458
Summary: ICE in in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1560
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111456
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105928
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105928
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Wilco Dijkstra :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc7070025d1a6668ff6cb4391f84771a7662def7
commit r14-4096-gfc7070025d1a6668ff6cb4391f84771a7662def7
Author: Wilco Dijkstra
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111255
Lehua Ding changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111255
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Lehua Ding :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ab744ace2478c4b986ec4ac27c0e3467b7a6419
commit r14-4094-g4ab744ace2478c4b986ec4ac27c0e3467b7a6419
Author: Lehua Ding
Date: Mon Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111457
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104475
--- Comment #28 from Richard Biener ---
I don't think anybody is working on this currently.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111457
Bug ID: 111457
Summary: [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression since
r14-3407-g936a12331a2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111456
Bug ID: 111456
Summary: [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression since
r14-3719-gb34f3736356
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111455
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111455
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|13.2.1 |14.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111455
Bug ID: 111455
Summary: [14 Regression] Using incorrect cast operator on
integer_pack
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111446
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Note originally I intended to have (match (...)) inlined in the match IL
itself,
so any such checking should not only check for direct recursion but indirect
as well - all SCCs are unsupported.
(match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104475
Andrew Haley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aph at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #27
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111444
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111425
--- Comment #5 from Frank Scheiner ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Confirmed on trunk - we ICE in cselib during var-tracking, so
> -fno-var-tracking would be a workaround (or -g0).
Also confirming that both - i.e. using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111413
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111430
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111294
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111294
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d45ddc2c04e471d0dcee016b6edacc00b8341b16
commit r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471d0dcee016b6edacc00b8341b16
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30484
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30484
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
operation_could_trap_helper_p is also wrong in only checking for integer_zerop
on the divisor though a literal x / -1 could be optimized to x * -1 and thus
safely rewritten to unsigned arithmetic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111435
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fafd2502c5416fe4f69daf13224ab1efbf256a1c
commit r14-4086-gfafd2502c5416fe4f69daf13224ab1efbf256a1c
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Sun Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111412
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111454
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is either a dup of bug 111435 or bug 111442
Plausible. I saw the following strange behaviour:
$ ~/gcc/results/bin/gcc -c -O1 bug958B.c
gcc: internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111454
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is either a dup of bug 111435 or bug 111442
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111454
Bug ID: 111454
Summary: ice in get_nonzero_bits
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30484
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|INT_MIN % -1 is well|INT_MIN % -1 is well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111448
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
Also seen with sonic-pi
https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory:RISCV/sonic-pi/standard/riscv64
and psi+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111412
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Li Xu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10c7edcc65d4bf1d05a9f0791e77e7b953e3e796
commit r13-7822-g10c7edcc65d4bf1d05a9f0791e77e7b953e3e796
Author: xuli
Date: Mon Sep
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
