https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111355
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jiu Fu Guo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d80863d7f93c0a839d1fe5dc59be83153e89110
commit r14-4192-g4d80863d7f93c0a839d1fe5dc59be83153e89110
Author: Jiufu Guo
Date: Wed Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111495
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 55956
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55956=edit
reduced.ii
Attached minimised reproducer fails with -O3, works with -O2, per original.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111510
Bug ID: 111510
Summary: Modula-2 runtime ICE on arm-linux-gnueabihf:
iso/RTentity.mod:245:in findChildAndParent has caused
internal runtime error, RTentity is either corrupt or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111450
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Li Xu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47065ff360292c683670efb96df4b61f57dc1d9a
commit r14-4190-g47065ff360292c683670efb96df4b61f57dc1d9a
Author: xuli
Date: Thu Sep 21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111456
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108007
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 111507 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111507
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108007
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 111509 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111509
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108007
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 111508 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111508
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111509
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55955
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55955=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111509
Bug ID: 111509
Summary: Floating point exception with '-O3 -fno-dce
-fno-inline-small-functions -fno-tree-dce
-fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-dse'
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111508
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55953
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55953=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111508
Bug ID: 111508
Summary: Floating point exception with '-O3 -fno-dce
-fno-early-inlining -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse'
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111507
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55951
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55951=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111507
Bug ID: 111507
Summary: Floating point exception with '-O3'
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111506
Bug ID: 111506
Summary: RISC-V: Failed to vectorize conversion from INT64 ->
_Float16
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106164
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #18)
> I think the only thing left is supporting floating point.
Another testcase for integer but with a nop_conversion:
```
int f(int a)
{
unsigned b = a;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111456
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Just a quick note, --param=logical-op-non-short-circuit=0 also allows the
missed optimization to no longer to be missed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111504
--- Comment #2 from Xiang Gao ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Fails for the same reason with clang (both with libstdc++ and libc++)
>
> Are you sure this is valid C++ 20 code?
I am not 100% sure, but my understanding
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111505
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111505
Bug ID: 111505
Summary: Asan (address-sanitizer) bootstrap fails since
r14-4003-geaa8e8541349df
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111504
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Fails for the same reason with clang (both with libstdc++ and libc++)
Are you sure this is valid C++ 20 code?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90400
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61474
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90400
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d8e08ba9396b1f7da50011468f260250b7afaab7
commit r14-4186-gd8e08ba9396b1f7da50011468f260250b7afaab7
Author: Lewis Hyatt
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61474
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Lewis Hyatt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:601dbf2a799f691688dfe78250b5bea2717b5b5e
commit r14-4185-g601dbf2a799f691688dfe78250b5bea2717b5b5e
Author: Lewis Hyatt
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111504
Bug ID: 111504
Summary: compare operator not defined for recursive data types
on C++20
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111502
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Waterman ---
Ack, I misunderstood your earlier message. You're of course right that the
load/load/shift/or sequence is preferable to the load/load/store/store/load
sequence, on just about any practical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111503
Bug ID: 111503
Summary: Issues with POINTER, OPTIONAL, CONTIGUOUS dummy
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111502
--- Comment #5 from Lasse Collin ---
If I understood correctly, PR 50417 is about wishing that GCC would infer that
a pointer given to memcpy has alignment higher than one. In my examples the
alignment of the uint8_t *b argument is one and thus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107716
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 07:07:37PM +, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107716
>
> --- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
--- Comment #2 from Luke ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Can you attach (compilible) examples code for each issue? Really these
> should be filed seperately too.
do u mean, i should file 3 further bug reports?
i try examples
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107716
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111502
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||50417
--- Comment #4 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111502
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111502
--- Comment #2 from Lasse Collin ---
Byte access by default is good when the compiler doesn't know if unaligned is
fast on the target processor. There is no disagreement here.
What I suspect is a bug is the instruction sequence used for byte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107716
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What the heck does "RESOLVED MOVED"?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111502
Andrew Waterman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew at sifive dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111502
Bug ID: 111502
Summary: Suboptimal unaligned 2/4-byte memcpy on strict-align
targets
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111493
--- Comment #2 from Chris Elrod ---
Note that it also shows up in gcc-13. I put gcc-14 as the version to indicate
that I confirmed it is still a problem on latest trunk. Not sure what the
policy is on which version we should report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111483
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111054
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 104993, which changed state.
Bug 104993 Summary: [modules] Missing diagnostic when exporting using-directive
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104993
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104993
Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111501
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111501
palmer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-09-20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111496
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Optimizer issue when|Optimizer issue when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110751
--- Comment #42 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27282dc0931484c31fa391772499d878afcc746a
commit r14-4179-g27282dc0931484c31fa391772499d878afcc746a
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111501
Bug ID: 111501
Summary: RISC-V: non-optimal casting when shifting
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111471
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75c4b0cde4835b45350da0a5cd82f1d1a0a7a2f1
commit r14-4178-g75c4b0cde4835b45350da0a5cd82f1d1a0a7a2f1
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111481
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111481
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111499
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Michal Lachowicz from comment #2)
> N.B. Bug exists on current release gcc 13.2
Yes, but you're still not using the devel/omp/gcc-12 branch from Git.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111499
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The only reason it doesn't compile is because you explicitly told the compiler
to make it not compile. This is just a warning, not an error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111499
--- Comment #2 from Michal Lachowicz ---
N.B. Bug exists on current release gcc 13.2
https://godbolt.org/z/zeKbhPY4r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111499
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. the version is 12.2.0, you're not using the devel/omp/gcc-12 branch in
Git.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500
Bug ID: 111500
Summary: [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111497
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
When comparing RTL dump files between r247719 and r247721, ira dump is pretty
much the same (just printed compiler pointers in the dump change), while reload
dump has lots of changes including this pseudo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111499
Bug ID: 111499
Summary: std::vector less operator< doesn't compile
with optimalisation due to __builtin_memcmp
Product: gcc
Version: og12 (devel/omp/gcc-12)
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111498
Bug ID: 111498
Summary: 951% profile quality regression between
g:93996cfb308ffc63 (2023-09-18 03:40) and
g:95d2ce05fb32e663 (2023-09-19 03:22)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111497
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111497
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Testcase:
class A;
struct B { const char *b1; int b2; };
struct C : B { C (const char *x, int y) { b1 = x; b2 = y; } };
struct D : C { D (B x) : C (x.b1, x.b2) {} };
struct E { E (A *); };
struct F : E { D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111497
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111497
Bug ID: 111497
Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE building mariadb on i686
since r8-470
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108007
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111490
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103100
--- Comment #24 from Wilco ---
Patch to avoid emitting unaligned LDP/STP with -mstrict-align:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-September/631022.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111496
Bug ID: 111496
Summary: Optimizer issue when reinitializing an object of a
standard-layout class with a trivial copy constructor
and a trivial destructor
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111493
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111495
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
ind-annotations --disable-vtable-verify --disable-libvtv
--with-zstd --without-isl --enable-default-pie --enable-host-pie
--disable-host-bind-now --enable-default-ssp
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20230920 (experimen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111411
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111411
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74f99f1adc696f446115f36974a3f94f66294a53
commit r12-9886-g74f99f1adc696f446115f36974a3f94f66294a53
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111411
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4bb1ae3c13ce4fb72129229de66f5ffbcd45fe4c
commit r13-7827-g4bb1ae3c13ce4fb72129229de66f5ffbcd45fe4c
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111489
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.3.0, 13.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111489
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8a2a12464d25c45a51c14a025e8e2d3ca8ebeb0
commit r14-4170-gb8a2a12464d25c45a51c14a025e8e2d3ca8ebeb0
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111494
Bug ID: 111494
Summary: Signed overflow introduced by vectorizer
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111493
Bug ID: 111493
Summary: [concepts] multidimensional subscript operator inside
requires is broken
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111392
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111489
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111392
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04b2fb5bb644f172879a02e8374ad50b669e3d6d
commit r14-4167-g04b2fb5bb644f172879a02e8374ad50b669e3d6d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111489
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90293
--- Comment #4 from Zev Weiss ---
I have no idea about the relative ease of implementation, but might it at least
partially suffice for the compiler to propagate the information provided by
__builtin_expect() beyond the expression it appears in?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111488
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Lehua Ding :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d024a31a09d18d2586769602205a60ff3afe568c
commit r14-4166-gd024a31a09d18d2586769602205a60ff3afe568c
Author: Lehua Ding
Date: Wed Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111409
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80048aa13a6b55d2be485000840a4e1c8b57d8e7
commit r14-4165-g80048aa13a6b55d2be485000840a4e1c8b57d8e7
Author: Omar Sandoval
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111486
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
90 matches
Mail list logo
