https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112524
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Yes, this looks like illegal indeed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112524
--- Comment #2 from Jack Perry ---
Either way, the correct behavior would be to report an error, right? the `for`
expression should be surrounded by parentheses, at least when Ada 2022 is
selected. But it seems instead to call that an error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112529
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112524
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78904
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b42a09b258c3ed8d1368e0ef0948034dcf0f8ac9
commit r14-5456-gb42a09b258c3ed8d1368e0ef0948034dcf0f8ac9
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110338
Bug 110338 depends on bug 110341, which changed state.
Bug 110341 Summary: [C++26] P1854R4 - Making non-encodable string literals
ill-formed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110341
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110341
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110341
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:194825f20619a1c4b51eaea84f20432fefc0db03
commit r14-5454-g194825f20619a1c4b51eaea84f20432fefc0db03
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112529
Bug ID: 112529
Summary: ACATS test c250002 uses illegal filename on APFS
filesystem
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112374
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
I wonder if there is some debug comparison failure going on that gets exposed
via having those patterns. Maybe try compiling i386-expand.cc with
-fcompare-debug manually might be able to detect it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112104
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112511
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112514
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112523
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112481
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112481
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Stubbs :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:948b8b6e0e50958ecf56d4d9fb7ac16f245d9cc3
commit r14-5453-g948b8b6e0e50958ecf56d4d9fb7ac16f245d9cc3
Author: Andrew Stubbs
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112528
Bug ID: 112528
Summary: State explosions in
gcc.dg/analyzer/pr93032-mztools-{signed,unsigned}-char
.c when enabling taint checker
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111956
--- Comment #12 from Gaius Mulley ---
Many thanks for the feedback and testing - I'll rework the patch and post it to
gcc-patches as suggested.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26831
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112478
--- Comment #8 from Kito Cheng ---
Proposed fix:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/636466.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112491
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4db820928065eccbeb725406450d826186582b9f
commit r14-5450-g4db820928065eccbeb725406450d826186582b9f
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112509
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112509
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f331be42991aa4d58ac770faf993accfcce882b
commit r14-5449-g8f331be42991aa4d58ac770faf993accfcce882b
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112478
--- Comment #7 from Michael T. Kloos ---
Thank you, Kito Cheng. I really appreciate it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112491
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112491
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to ks1322 from comment #0)
> d.push_front(0);
The bug occurs when the first node of the deque is not filled from the first
element. That case was never tested.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112337
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ddb479e796bee3964ddb6a2daa8f79598e47cede
commit r14-5447-gddb479e796bee3964ddb6a2daa8f79598e47cede
Author: Saurabh Jha
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112282
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
+ _ifc__797 = al[0].D.2794;
+ _ifc__796 = BIT_INSERT_EXPR <_ifc__797, 7, 0 (20 bits)>;
+ _ifc__798 = BIT_INSERT_EXPR <_ifc__796, 9, 32 (20 bits)>;
+ _ifc__800 = BIT_INSERT_EXPR <_ifc__798, 8, 52 (10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112337
--- Comment #10 from Saurabh Jha ---
Hey,
This ICE uncovered something in Arm MVE. We proposed a fix in this patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/635789.html
Regards,
Saurabh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112481
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111445
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 111572 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111233
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111652
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112113
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111838
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111727
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111789
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111233
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2066c29bf8dea87c9810eb261e342d941a6b2059
commit r14-5446-g2066c29bf8dea87c9810eb261e342d941a6b2059
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111838
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2066c29bf8dea87c9810eb261e342d941a6b2059
commit r14-5446-g2066c29bf8dea87c9810eb261e342d941a6b2059
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111652
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2066c29bf8dea87c9810eb261e342d941a6b2059
commit r14-5446-g2066c29bf8dea87c9810eb261e342d941a6b2059
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112113
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2066c29bf8dea87c9810eb261e342d941a6b2059
commit r14-5446-g2066c29bf8dea87c9810eb261e342d941a6b2059
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111727
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2066c29bf8dea87c9810eb261e342d941a6b2059
commit r14-5446-g2066c29bf8dea87c9810eb261e342d941a6b2059
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112276
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112527
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112527
--- Comment #2 from Robin Dapp ---
Ah, thanks, so it depends on zve32f which implies zve32x. Ok, then all good
and we can close this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112527
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kito at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110411
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by jeevitha :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b1f59c1c1ca9bc24fbf7dbfce81a99153b3a933
commit r13-8064-g4b1f59c1c1ca9bc24fbf7dbfce81a99153b3a933
Author: Jeevitha
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112485
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
See also https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2023-November/392990.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112485
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112113
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112527
Bug ID: 112527
Summary: RVV integer vector instructions generated with
rv64gc_zvfh
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.0
Summary|[12/13/14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112281
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ea2965b499f9e491e45db19fedbccfccb75076a
commit r14-5444-g5ea2965b499f9e491e45db19fedbccfccb75076a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109184
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Note even when promoting _2 to an array there wouldn't be any data dependence
between the actual refs. There's a dependence between stmts, but that doesn't
exactly capture the issue either. Consider
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112514
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aad65285a1c681feb9fc5b041c86d841b24c3d2a
commit r14-5442-gaad65285a1c681feb9fc5b041c86d841b24c3d2a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97756
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aad65285a1c681feb9fc5b041c86d841b24c3d2a
commit r14-5442-gaad65285a1c681feb9fc5b041c86d841b24c3d2a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112523
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aad65285a1c681feb9fc5b041c86d841b24c3d2a
commit r14-5442-gaad65285a1c681feb9fc5b041c86d841b24c3d2a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112526
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56583|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112526
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56582|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112513
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Grund ---
Thank you, I replaced that by
unsigned unused;
__cpuid(1, cpuid1.val, unused, unused, unused);
and it works in the setup I have.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112481
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palmer at dabbelt dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112481
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023, ams at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112481
>
> --- Comment #7 from Andrew Stubbs ---
> Simply changing to OPTAB_WIDEN solves the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112481
--- Comment #8 from JuzheZhong ---
I am not familiar with scalar stuff of RISC-V.
CCing kito, Robin and Jeff to confirm this issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112481
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Stubbs ---
Simply changing to OPTAB_WIDEN solves the ICE, but I don't know if it does so
in a sensible way, for RISC V.
@@ -7489,7 +7489,7 @@ store_constructor (tree exp, rtx target, int cleared,
poly_int64 size,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112281
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
ldist distributes the loop nest where which looks like
[local count: 118111600]:
# c.6_23 = PHI <_4(9), 2(2)>
# ivtmp_1 = PHI
_13 = c.6_23 + 1;
[local count: 955630224]:
# e.4_22 = PHI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112498
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> Maybe we could add "is not allowed in ISO C++" or similar to the warning.
This has been done for GCC 14:
fp.cc:2:20: warning: ISO C++ does not allow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112374
--- Comment #12 from Hongtao.liu ---
> So the testsuite without bootstrap is really unchanged? We still have a
Yes, no extra regression observed from gcc testsuite(both w/ and w/o
--with-arch=skylake-avx512 --with-cpu=skylake-avx512 in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111842
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112523
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The patch fixes the libstdc++ tests too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112523
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
My i686-linux bootstrap also finished with that patch (failed without it), but
regtest is still pending (and x86_64-linux bootstrap is ongoing too).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112374
--- Comment #11 from Robin Dapp ---
Thanks for figuring that out. No idea if the pattern is the problem, most
likely not? I rather suppose there is still a missing fixup somewhere in the
vectorizer that I didn't encounter with my testing.
So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112526
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
$ gcc uhoh-camellia.i -O2 -m32 -o uhoh ; ./uhoh
$ gcc uhoh-camellia.i -O2 -m32 -o uhoh -march=znver2 ; ./uhoh
Aborted (core dumped)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112526
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56583
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56583=edit
reduced.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112523
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Trying now
> 2023-11-14 Jakub Jelinek
>
> * config/i386/i386.md (3_doubleword_lowpart): Move
> operands[1] aka low part of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112526
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56582
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56582=edit
reduced.c
First stab at a reduction.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112374
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
Below patch can pass bootstrap --with-arch=skylake-avx512
--with-cpu=skylake-avx512, but didn't observe obvious typo/bug in the pattern.
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111842
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483
--- Comment #19 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #18)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #17)
> > Works for me. Will you send the simplify_gen_unary ->
> > simplify_unary_operation change to gcc-patches?
>
> I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112513
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111842
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69d69865a792a93cce2905617c53913769d0f260
commit r14-5436-g69d69865a792a93cce2905617c53913769d0f260
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112498
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69d69865a792a93cce2905617c53913769d0f260
commit r14-5436-g69d69865a792a93cce2905617c53913769d0f260
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112513
Alexander Grund changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Alexander
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111309
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7383cb56e1170789929201b0dadc156888928fdd
commit r14-5435-g7383cb56e1170789929201b0dadc156888928fdd
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112526
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56581
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56581=edit
camellia-PR112526.tar.xz
Binaries were built with:
* bad: 89e5d902fc55ad375f149f25a84c516ad360a606
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112330
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe23a2ff1f5072559552be0e41ab55bf72f5c79f
commit r14-5434-gfe23a2ff1f5072559552be0e41ab55bf72f5c79f
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Fri Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112526
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Not for this, for the r14-5385 introduced issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112510
--- Comment #15 from Vladimir Sadovnikov ---
Hmmm. But why not? We're just looking for the value stored in %rbx register...
Here's scenario for GCC 7.5.0:
~/tmp> gcc --version
gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0
Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112526
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112523
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112514
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Trying
2023-11-14 Jakub Jelinek
* config/i386/i386.md (3_doubleword_lowpart): Move
operands[1] aka low part of input rather than operands[3] aka high
part of input to output if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112510
--- Comment #14 from Vladimir Sadovnikov ---
Seems that with GCC 7.6 it also will be reproducible because we have the same
code there:
```
40089c: bf 80 03 00 00 mov$0x380,%edi
4008a1: e8 6a fd ff ff call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112510
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Sadovnikov ---
Here is the full scenario:
~$ g++ --version
g++ (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.4.0
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112526
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
ubsan doesn't find anything in the camellia test. The general test suite
suffers from an issue in the teardown code though.
I'll upload both binaries now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112526
Bug ID: 112526
Summary: [14 regression] Miscompilation of ffmpeg test for -m32
since r14-4968-g89e5d902fc55ad
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112514
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112510
--- Comment #12 from Vladimir Sadovnikov ---
Oh wow, it seems that this makes the code to crash:
```
export ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_stack_use_after_return=1
./test
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112510
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Sadovnikov ---
I mean, this code may work in improper way if ASAN allocates only 0x20 bytes on
the stack:
```
138d: bf 80 03 00 00 mov$0x380,%edi
1392: e8 39 fd ff ff call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112496
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f28306b4fd309b579c8a4a5bf2f1b24fa40f8f7f
commit r14-5433-gf28306b4fd309b579c8a4a5bf2f1b24fa40f8f7f
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Nov
101 - 200 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
