[Bug libstdc++/112089] std::shared_lock::unlock should throw operation_not_permitted instead resource_deadlock_would_occur

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112089 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Backported for 13.3 and 12.4

[Bug target/113960] [11/12 Regression] std::map with std::vector as input overwrites itself with c++20, on s390x platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113960 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #17) > Fixed for 13.3 and 14.1 so far ... and 12.4 now too.

[Bug libstdc++/108846] std::copy, std::copy_n and std::copy_backward on potentially overlapping subobjects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108846 --- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely --- Backported for 12.4

[Bug libstdc++/86419] codecvt::in() and out() incorrectly return ok in some cases.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86419 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.0|12.4

[Bug libstdc++/109758] std::abs(__float128) doesn't support NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109758 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.2|12.4 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/110593] The std::ratio meta arithmetic can accept non-std::ratio

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110593 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|14.0|12.4 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan

[Bug c++/114377] [13/14 Regression] GCC crashes on an example of CTAD for alias templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114377 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Known to

[Bug libstdc++/40380] class documentation should mention include file to use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40380 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:afefe951acd8bae13be0e1b700262316254ce935 commit r12-10278-gafefe951acd8bae13be0e1b700262316254ce935 Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/112089] std::shared_lock::unlock should throw operation_not_permitted instead resource_deadlock_would_occur

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112089 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c285c1b9a940bde745f296e1bfc1a5cfddb63254 commit r12-10252-gc285c1b9a940bde745f296e1bfc1a5cfddb63254 Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/86419] codecvt::in() and out() incorrectly return ok in some cases.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86419 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12c193e5723f08694c8784457200112bae117063 commit r12-10246-g12c193e5723f08694c8784457200112bae117063 Author: Dimitrij

[Bug libstdc++/112473] integer_sequence accepts non-integer types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112473 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc0964f43dcee46dcd1843287a541668fd08a4a8 commit r12-10254-gdc0964f43dcee46dcd1843287a541668fd08a4a8 Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/111172] Dead code in std::get for variant?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15c517049c0d8b6319990445939a69bb36fdc678 commit r12-10253-g15c517049c0d8b6319990445939a69bb36fdc678 Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/107376] regex executor requires allocator to be default constructible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107376 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c156f5be49007a5434452335f29844eb17868a6 commit r12-10258-g5c156f5be49007a5434452335f29844eb17868a6 Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/109758] std::abs(__float128) doesn't support NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109758 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f381ebb7211c1359f5de87760148096fcba3357 commit r12-10244-g9f381ebb7211c1359f5de87760148096fcba3357 Author: Jonathan

[Bug target/113960] [11/12 Regression] std::map with std::vector as input overwrites itself with c++20, on s390x platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113960 --- Comment #18 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f5dcea85a31845ec6f4b6886734b0f02e013718 commit r12-10251-g6f5dcea85a31845ec6f4b6886734b0f02e013718 Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/108846] std::copy, std::copy_n and std::copy_backward on potentially overlapping subobjects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108846 --- Comment #26 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ec265c1464dec74f98e6914cd164af5090a39ff commit r12-10250-g8ec265c1464dec74f98e6914cd164af5090a39ff Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/52799] deque::emplace(iterator, ...) tries to call push_front(...), which doesn't exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52799 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1bb2bfb5d984456f59b42228f06d4ad4976358e7 commit r12-10240-g1bb2bfb5d984456f59b42228f06d4ad4976358e7 Author: Jonathan

[Bug c++/84542] missing -Wdeprecated-declarations on a redeclared function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84542 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfa7e7dfc19e07bff319636cf1bdfd57b6c68f41 commit r12-10245-gbfa7e7dfc19e07bff319636cf1bdfd57b6c68f41 Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/91910] Debug mode: there is a racing condition between destructors of iterator and the associated container.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91910 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:73d0816f570c26e856d94d56491e50332fd8b425 commit r12-10237-g73d0816f570c26e856d94d56491e50332fd8b425 Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/110593] The std::ratio meta arithmetic can accept non-std::ratio

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110593 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae8302e18f15f0befb372762b20a3a790a19a925 commit r12-10238-gae8302e18f15f0befb372762b20a3a790a19a925 Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/66146] call_once not C++11-compliant on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146 --- Comment #57 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:415457babf04d077929956ea97132448b0dc4b2c commit r12-10226-g415457babf04d077929956ea97132448b0dc4b2c Author: Jonathan

[Bug c++/107500] [12 Regression] Useless atexit entry for ~constant_init in eh_globals.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107500 --- Comment #28 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9076dafa12c93e96b349035fb59050151403866 commit r12-10222-gd9076dafa12c93e96b349035fb59050151403866 Author: Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/114147] [11/12 Regression] tuple allocator-extended constructor requires non-explicit default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114147 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbdeeb1604d52a8ece8631f70ecd64d925d31741 commit r12-10221-gfbdeeb1604d52a8ece8631f70ecd64d925d31741 Author: Jonathan

[Bug testsuite/114320] New test case in r14-9439-g4aa87b856067d4 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114320 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Assignee|unassigned

[Bug testsuite/114320] New test case in r14-9439-g4aa87b856067d4 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114320 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/114154] gcc.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.c XPASSes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114154 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- > possibly "fallout" of r14-9193-ga0b1798042d033 It's not: I've reverted that patch locally, rebuilt cc1 and re-tested: the XPASSes remain.

[Bug testsuite/114320] New test case in r14-9439-g4aa87b856067d4 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114320 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6cb5ef37c2fac240b68d8ee438aba4885956269f commit r14-9517-g6cb5ef37c2fac240b68d8ee438aba4885956269f Author: Nathaniel Shead

[Bug libstdc++/114359] std::binomial_distribution hangs in infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114359 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/60679] [DR1647] class specialization not instantiated even though it is a better match than the primary template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60679 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hokein.wu at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/114378] GCC fails on selecting a partial template specialization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114378 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/114379] New: stringop-overflow warning on C++ code with -O2 (or -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114379 Bug ID: 114379 Summary: stringop-overflow warning on C++ code with -O2 (or -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations) Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/114378] New: GCC fails on selecting a partial template specialization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114378 Bug ID: 114378 Summary: GCC fails on selecting a partial template specialization. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/114367] std::vector constexpr initialization doesn't start lifetime of array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114367 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.4 Keywords|

[Bug c++/114377] New: GCC crashes on an example of CTAD for alias templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114377 Bug ID: 114377 Summary: GCC crashes on an example of CTAD for alias templates Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug objc++/61759] [ICE] [objc++] reaching gcc_unreachable in objc_eh_runtime_type at objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-01.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61759 --- Comment #17 from Sergey Fedorov --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15) Iain, any chance of addressing this one? If would have really helped with quite a number of usable software for PowerPC (majority of which are 32-bit, and even

[Bug rtl-optimization/14418] Unnecessary loads and stores for tail call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14418 --- Comment #6 from Mikołaj Piróg --- Oh, this is for i486-pc-linux-gnu, I overlooked that. Nevertheless, this still occurs on x86_64-linux-gnu. Should I file new bug report regarding this?

[Bug target/105522] [powerpc-darwin] ICE: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:3059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105522 --- Comment #15 from Sergey Fedorov --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #12) > (In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #11) > > (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #10) > > > The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : > >

[Bug target/105522] [powerpc-darwin] ICE: in decode_addr_const, at varasm.c:3059

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105522 --- Comment #14 from Sergey Fedorov --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13) > fixed on trunk, intending to backport it. Great! Once it is on your branches, hopefully Macports borrows the patch as well.

[Bug rust/113499] crab1 fails to link when configuring with --disable-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113499 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #4) > If I understood Arthur correctly, GCC/Rust is going to effectively require > 'dlopen' (and therefore '--enable-plugin'?), so that means, if the latter's >

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think arm is unaffected as well, while it does pass the hidden return pointer in a register normally used for first argument, that argument should return 0 for arm_needs_doubleword_align

[Bug tree-optimization/114375] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong vectorization of permuted mask load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114375 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I see that get_load_store_type and get_group_load_store_type return VMAT_* kinds that do not handle the masked case. There's some rejection in the callers for that case but it's also incomplete

[Bug rtl-optimization/14418] Unnecessary loads and stores for tail call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14418 Mikołaj Piróg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikolajpirog at gmail dot com ---

[Bug libstdc++/113782] constexpr on std::initializer_list, std::pair and std::tuple is non-conforming for C++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113782 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek --- Eventhough aarch64 has such !TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P test around advancing, most likely it is unaffected, as the hidden return pointer goes in x8 register, while normal integral arguments go in x0-x7.

[Bug libstdc++/66146] call_once not C++11-compliant on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146 --- Comment #56 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2c960dd7ebe2db0e8153a7e691245a4928341c6 commit r13-8464-ga2c960dd7ebe2db0e8153a7e691245a4928341c6 Author: Jonathan

[Bug rust/113499] crab1 fails to link when configuring with --disable-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113499 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/Rust-GCC

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 57723 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57723=edit gcc14-pr114175-rs6000.patch So far just lightly tested (cross on the new testcase, scp to cfarm and executed there

[Bug target/114376] New: s390: Inefficient __builtin_bswap16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114376 Bug ID: 114376 Summary: s390: Inefficient __builtin_bswap16 Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug libobjc/48626] --enable-objc-gc should be automatic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48626 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe --- > now that boehm-gc is no longer in tree > > what should we do with this? > > I suppose there could be some more sophisticated top-level

[Bug tree-optimization/114375] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Wrong vectorization of permuted mask load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114375 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.4.0, 12.3.0, 13.2.1,

[Bug tree-optimization/114375] New: Wrong vectorization of permuted mask load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114375 Bug ID: 114375 Summary: Wrong vectorization of permuted mask load Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #28 from Xi Ruoyao --- LoongArch patch (tested): https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647928.html

[Bug target/114175] [13/14] Execution test failures on gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-6.c on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114175 --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek --- More complete testcase: #include struct S { int a[1024]; }; int f1 (...) { int r = 0; va_list ap; va_start (ap); r += va_arg (ap, int); va_end (ap); return r; } int f2 (...) { int r = 0; va_list ap;

[Bug tree-optimization/114374] [12/13/14 Regression] snprintf Wformat-truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114374 --- Comment #4 from Torsten Mandel --- E.g.: #include "stdio.h" #include int main() { char buf[11]; int loop(1); do { snprintf(buf,sizeof(buf),"%d",loop++); } while(loop<10); }

[Bug tree-optimization/114374] [12/13/14 Regression] snprintf Wformat-truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114374 --- Comment #3 from Torsten Mandel --- Sorry, actually it also triggers for values below LONG_MAX on gcc-12 & gcc-13 so it also works without UB which should not be the case.

[Bug tree-optimization/114374] [12/13/14 Regression] snprintf Wformat-truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114374 --- Comment #2 from Torsten Mandel --- No, it only happens on overflow, although diagnostic behavior would still be inconsistent regarding the ++loop and the loop++ case.

[Bug tree-optimization/114374] [12/13/14 Regression] snprintf Wformat-truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114374 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] snprintf |[12/13/14 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/67683] Missed vectorization: shifts of an induction variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67683 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/114347] wrong constant folding when casting __bf16 to int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114347 --- Comment #9 from Hongtao Liu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > > You can use -fexcess-precision=16 if you don't want treating _Float16 and > > __bf16 as having excess precision.

[Bug middle-end/114347] wrong constant folding when casting __bf16 to int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114347 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > > You can use -fexcess-precision=16 if you don't want treating _Float16 and > > __bf16 as having excess

[Bug middle-end/114347] wrong constant folding when casting __bf16 to int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114347 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > You can use -fexcess-precision=16 if you don't want treating _Float16 and > __bf16 as having excess precision. With excess precision, I think the above >

[Bug tree-optimization/114369] tree-vect-loop.cc uses vec_step which is also an altivec intrinsics breaks build when building with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114369 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- I'm inclined to close this as INVALID, but I'd accept working around the clang bug by, in system.h, guarded on __clang and powerpc, doing an #undef vec_step.

[Bug tree-optimization/113727] [14 Regression] csmith: differences from nothing to -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113727 --- Comment #13 from Sam James --- I'll spend some CPU hours with cvise on this. -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero seems to make -O1 work.

[Bug c/114374] New: [12/13 Regression] snprintf Wformat-truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114374 Bug ID: 114374 Summary: [12/13 Regression] snprintf Wformat-truncation Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/114160] ICE on RISCV (-mcpu=thead-c906) when building glibc in dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114160 Christoph Müllner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/114160] ICE on RISCV (-mcpu=thead-c906) when building glibc in dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114160 Christoph Müllner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |cmuellner at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/114347] wrong constant folding when casting __bf16 to int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114347 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/114160] ICE on RISCV (-mcpu=thead-c906) when building glibc in dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114160 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- (In reply to Christoph Müllner from comment #2) > The fix for this issue ("riscv: xtheadmempair: Fix CFA reg notes") has been > cherry-picked from master and pushed to releases/gcc-13. > > Btw, I don't have

[Bug target/114160] ICE on RISCV (-mcpu=thead-c906) when building glibc in dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114160 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Müllner --- The fix for this issue ("riscv: xtheadmempair: Fix CFA reg notes") has been cherry-picked from master and pushed to releases/gcc-13. Btw, I don't have permission to change the ticket fields. So,

[Bug middle-end/114347] wrong constant folding when casting __bf16 to int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114347 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug lto/113208] [14 Regression] lto1: error: Alias and target's comdat groups differs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- (ah, there's no archives here, so no need to worry about that part)

[Bug lto/113208] [14 Regression] lto1: error: Alias and target's comdat groups differs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #0) > seen with trunk 20240101, building the poedit package with -flto. > > hints where to start the reduction are appreciated. > First, take the link command and see

[Bug tree-optimization/67683] Missed vectorization: shifts of an induction variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67683 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- /app/example.cpp:5:20: note: vect_is_simple_use: operand # RANGE [irange] short unsigned int [0, 2047][3294, 3294][6589, 6589][13179, 13179][26359, 26359][52719, 52719] val_16 = PHI , type of def:

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 35226, which changed state. Bug 35226 Summary: Induction with multiplication are not vectorized https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35226 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/67683] Missed vectorization: shifts of an induction variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67683 Bug 67683 depends on bug 35226, which changed state. Bug 35226 Summary: Induction with multiplication are not vectorized https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35226 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/35226] Induction with multiplication are not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35226 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/36587] Feature: add warning for constructor call with discarded return.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36587 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Kaz Kylheku from comment #15) > In April 2020 I created a patch for the GNU C Preprocessor, with > documentation, test cases and everything. I submitted it to the GCC Patches > mailing list,

[Bug testsuite/40130] using RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board 'foo{-mxyz,-mjkl,}'" screws up ieee.exp (and possibly others?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40130 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/35226] Induction with multiplication are not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35226 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/104539] Failed to inline a very simple template function when it's explicit instantiated.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104539 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||programmerjake at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/71587] missed inlining extern template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71587 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/71587] missed inlining extern template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71587 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |c++ --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/71258] Missed optimizations: dynamic allocation, virtual calls, empty destructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71258 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #4 from Andrew

[Bug c++/36587] Feature: add warning for constructor call with discarded return.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36587 --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely --- No, the nodiscard warnings must be silenced with a cast to void. They can't be "stronger" than that.

[Bug tree-optimization/71258] Missed optimizations: dynamic allocation, virtual calls, empty destructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71258 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 57722 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57722=edit testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/66003] missed cse opportunity in addr expressions because of tree pre/lim

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66003 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/114372] Confusing ODR warning with different typedefs (show the canonical non-aggregate type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114372 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug lto/114372] Confusing ODR warning with different typedefs (show the canonical non-aggregate type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114372 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I am not 100% sure if we record where the typedef is located but it might be useful to print those out too.

[Bug fortran/114373] New: BLOCK construct not correctly analyzed with -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114373 Bug ID: 114373 Summary: BLOCK construct not correctly analyzed with -fopenmp Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/114372] Confusing ODR warning with different typedefs (show the canonical non-aggregate type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114372 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Severity|normal

[Bug lto/114372] New: Confusing ODR warning with different typedefs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114372 Bug ID: 114372 Summary: Confusing ODR warning with different typedefs Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

<    1   2