https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114429
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114429
Bug ID: 114429
Summary: [x86] (neg a) ashifrt>> 31 can be optimized to a > 0.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114428
Bug ID: 114428
Summary: [x86] psrad xmm, xmm, 16 and pand xmm, const_vector
(0x x4) can be optimized to psrld
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114427
Bug ID: 114427
Summary: [x86] ec_pack_truncv8si/v4si can be optimized with
pblendw instead of pand for AVX2 target
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114426
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
g++ -c domconfigurator.cpp.ii -std=c++20 -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114426
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.gentoo.org/sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114426
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57765
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57765=edit
domconfigurator.cpp.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114426
Bug ID: 114426
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building log4cxx on arm
(cxx_eval_call_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:3242)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109619
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/648202.html
_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --enable-libsanitizer
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r14-9595-20240321132344-ga2fe34e0b99-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.1 20240321 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114352
Li Pan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114352
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9941f0295a14659e25260458efd2e46a68ad0342
commit r14-9605-g9941f0295a14659e25260458efd2e46a68ad0342
Author: Pan Li
Date: Tue Mar 19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114352
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3c24e9e55a7cf18df313a8b32b6de4b3ba81013
commit r14-9604-gd3c24e9e55a7cf18df313a8b32b6de4b3ba81013
Author: Pan Li
Date: Mon Mar 18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #24 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6a3d1f5bcfd954b614155d96c97bde8ac230e2e
commit r13-8488-ge6a3d1f5bcfd954b614155d96c97bde8ac230e2e
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a6c7aa1b011b77fcd9b19f7b8d7ff0fc823cdb2
commit r14-9603-g9a6c7aa1b011b77fcd9b19f7b8d7ff0fc823cdb2
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114422
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114422
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1542e8a44cc35e63233d3557afbf501c5ff84c55
commit r14-9602-g1542e8a44cc35e63233d3557afbf501c5ff84c55
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114417
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 57763
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57763=edit
proposed patch
is that the correct approach? most likely has to be guarded with a configure
option.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110714
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This works with Clang and EDG.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110714
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-07-18 00:00:00 |2024-3-22
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114424
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 114424 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114424
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114424
Bug ID: 114424
Summary: gnat: Ada.Calendar.Clock crashes on 32bit
architectures with 64bit time_t
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101790
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114406
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114423
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114423
Bug ID: 114423
Summary: Incorrectly placed caret in the message about expanded
_Pragma
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109619
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] ICE: |[12/13/14 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109619
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: tree check: expected |[12/13/14 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93041
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113619
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106358
Bug 106358 depends on bug 113619, which changed state.
Bug 113619 Summary: [14 Regression] -Wanalyzer-tainted-divisor false positive
seen in Linux kernel's fs/ceph/ioctl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113619
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113619
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a5a4a4467b2e18ff4fe24f565e120280d3e6ba7
commit r14-9600-g7a5a4a4467b2e18ff4fe24f565e120280d3e6ba7
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96196
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93041
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ingo at hannover dot ccc.de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93041
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||earlephilhower at yahoo dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 93041 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93041
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://eel.is/c++draft/intro.progress#1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96196
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||earlephilhower at yahoo dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/memory_model#Forward_progress is a
decent reference when it comes to what it means by forward progress in C++.
Note C and C++ have slightly different requirements.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99599
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Here we go, this still fails on trunk, just by making the data member private:
template class indirect {
public:
template requires // (!is_indirect) &&
requires (const T& t, const U& u) { t == u; }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
>I can't see anything and when run natively on the x86_64 (and -m32 x86)
The behavior changed in GCC 10+, so if you are testing using anything before
GCC 9, you would see the difference. Because on x86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99599
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Here's a very small reproducer:
template struct indirect {
template requires // (!is_indirect) &&
requires (const T& t, const U& u) { t == u; }
friend constexpr bool operator==(const indirect&,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114422
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 57761
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57761=edit
Proposed fix
Here is the proposed fix containing the escaped error message and three
regression tests.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114420
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114422
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114422
Bug ID: 114422
Summary: Attempting to declare a set of unknown type causes ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced to use `GCC unroll` instead:
```
template int t() {
#pragma GCC unroll 4
while (int ThisEntry = 0) { }
}
int tt = t<1>();
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
--- Comment #2 from Earle F. Philhower, III
---
Thanks very much for the fast explanation. For reference of others who might
hit this, I see references to C11 6.8.5 pp 6 online (but of course it's an ISO
document so not freely available).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113836
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48d49200510198cafcab55601cd8e5f8eb541f01
commit r14-9599-g48d49200510198cafcab55601cd8e5f8eb541f01
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
Bug ID: 114421
Summary: arm-none-eabi thumb -Os (and -O2) incorrectly
optimizes out needed class member call
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114420
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Hmm
>
> https://github.com/ghdl/ghdl/blob/master/doc/development/building/GCC.rst
Specifically "For ppc64/ppc64le platform,"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114420
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114420
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
ghdl report: https://github.com/ghdl/ghdl/issues/2629
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114420
Bug ID: 114420
Summary: ICE in rs6000_output_function_epilogue, at
config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc:5371 on
powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114419
Bug ID: 114419
Summary: amdgcn offload compiler fails to build with amdgcn
tools based on LLVM 18
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 49565, which changed state.
Bug 49565 Summary: character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not
DW_ATE_unsigned_char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114418
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114418
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba744d50ac0360f7992a42494db766f6548913e3
commit r14-9598-gba744d50ac0360f7992a42494db766f6548913e3
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114417
--- Comment #7 from Imple Lee ---
I tried to dig into the source code and it seems like it was designed to be
"passed via the stack". Not sure whether this was specified by the
specification (did not find relevant requirements, but I am not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103472
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:509352069d6f166d396f4b4a86e71ea521f2ca78
commit r14-9597-g509352069d6f166d396f4b4a86e71ea521f2ca78
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110323
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression] Code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110323
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:081f8937cb82da311c224da04b0c6cbd57a8fb5d
commit r14-9596-g081f8937cb82da311c224da04b0c6cbd57a8fb5d
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114418
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114418
Bug ID: 114418
Summary: Missing import of TSIZE from system causes ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105547
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111683
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114417
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114417
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|std::experimental::simd |std::experimental::simd is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114417
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
uint64_t f2 (struct type2 & x)
It is definitely passed by reference because of ABI requirements of C++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114417
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 57759
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57759=edit
testcase
Note please attach the testcase (or put it inline) instead of just linking to
godbolt next time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114417
--- Comment #3 from Imple Lee ---
Oh, I didn't make it clear. I am describing libstdc++'s std::experimental::simd
class.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114417
--- Comment #2 from Imple Lee ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I doubt this can change since this is the abi gcc decided on a long time ago.
If we implement the simd class as a wrapper around a vector, the parameter can
still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114417
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |target
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114417
Bug ID: 114417
Summary: simd parameters are passed by memory on x64 , not
using the available sse registers
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
--- Comment #68 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #67)
> (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #66)
> > Created attachment 57750 [details]
> > Patch comparing jump functions
> >
> > I'm testing this patch. (Not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114194
Christoph Müllner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |cmuellner at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114416
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
I've now also found p. 3P-10:
%f0 through %f7 Floating-point fields from structure return
(%d0 through %d6) values with a total size of 32 bytes or less
(%q0 and %q4)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114416
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 57758
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57758=edit
gcc14-pr114409.patch
Ah, I have a fix for the bogus warning, ANNOTATE_EXPR really needs to wrap the
whole condition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113622
--- Comment #26 from Richard Biener ---
I've enabled vec_set for hard-regs on the branch and plugged the vectorizer
hole for GCC 13. I'm not sure to what extent we need the expansion change.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114231
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.2.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114231
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04fffbaa87997ac893a9aa68b674c938ba3ecddb
commit r13-8486-g04fffbaa87997ac893a9aa68b674c938ba3ecddb
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42d5985e9884299c8d837ad1588fb47b211b4baf
commit r13-8485-g42d5985e9884299c8d837ad1588fb47b211b4baf
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113622
--- Comment #25 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4c0800aab864bb95260e12342d18695c6ebbec8
commit r13-8483-gd4c0800aab864bb95260e12342d18695c6ebbec8
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113670
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac664905b837095b15099e44e83471672eee7aa9
commit r13-8484-gac664905b837095b15099e44e83471672eee7aa9
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Perhaps better testcase:
template
T
foo (T)
{
static T t;
return 42 - ++t;
}
template
void
bar (T x)
{
#pragma GCC novector
while (T y = foo (x))
;
}
void
baz ()
{
bar (0);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523
--- Comment #41 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #38)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #36)
[...]
> But linear is linear, and stays linear, for way too big code it is just as
> acceptable as for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114409
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523
--- Comment #40 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #39)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37)
> > Created attachment 57753 [details]
> > quick attempt at a limit
> >
> > So like this?
>
> Hrm. It
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
