https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84568
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's a shame the fix happened after the inferior shared_ptr implementation was
frozen into libstdc++ though :-(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114635
Bug ID: 114635
Summary: OpenMP reductions fail dependency analysis
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, douglas.boffey at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
>
> --- Comment #23 from Douglas Boffey ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114531
Rama Malladi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rvmallad at amazon dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
--- Comment #23 from Douglas Boffey ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22)
> Note we're using -Wl,--stack,12582912 when linking the GCC executables, I
> wonder
> if the reporter can verify the segfaulting executables have the correct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114501
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|14.0|13.2.0
Priority|P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114604
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
--- Comment #22 from Richard Biener ---
Note we're using -Wl,--stack,12582912 when linking the GCC executables, I
wonder
if the reporter can verify the segfaulting executables have the correct stack
size set?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114501
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114624
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
--- Comment #73 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114624
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97d5cd8740384dbce5a83080916388f80d8976dd
commit r14-9829-g97d5cd8740384dbce5a83080916388f80d8976dd
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #29 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
>
> --- Comment #28 from Tobias Burnus ---
> Created attachment 57896
> --> https:/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907
--- Comment #72 from Sam James ---
It's up to RMs of course but FWIW, the critical part of this for me is fixed
now and it could be a P2 now if desired.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114634
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-04-08
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114634
Bug ID: 114634
Summary: Crash Issue Encountered in GCC Compilation of Template
Code with Aligned Attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112868
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
No problems reported yet and we have several people testing on ppc w/ gcc 14.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065
--- Comment #18 from Nicolas Boulenguez ---
Created attachment 57897
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57897&action=edit
rewrite commit 3/8 so that Duration'Size may be 32
Would version 4 of commit 3/8 be OK? It only modifies
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114633
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||rx-elf
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114633
Bug ID: 114633
Summary: [14 Regression] A cross to rx fails to build in
libstdc++
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
is that part of the language standard? I don't think we have to copy rustc
easter eggs - in fact I'd report this as a bug to them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114627
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] undefined |undefined behavior in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114623
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #28 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 57896
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57896&action=edit
Testcase
It seems as if 'tabs' cause problems, e.g. for:
profile_single_file= .true.
where the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114624
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114622
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66862
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114621
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114619
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113288
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #27 from Richard Biener ---
And find_group_name does
ios = 0
do while (ios <= 0)
read(unit, '(a)', iostat=ios, end=102) inrec
...
inrec2 = to_lower(adjustl(inrec))
! check for leading '&'
if (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #26 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 57895
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57895&action=edit
drv_in input file
This is the complete input file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114621
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629
Pierre-Emmanuel Patry changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pierre-emmanuel.patry@embec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener ---
(t_initf) Read in prof_inparm namelist from: drv_in
(shr_sys_abort) ERROR: (T_INITF) :: namelist read returns an error condition
for prof_inparm
(shr_sys_abort) WARNING: calling mpi_abort() and stopping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to chenglulu from comment #23)
> (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #22)
> > The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93adf88cc6744aa2c732b765e1e3b9
201 - 237 of 237 matches
Mail list logo