https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115022
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115022
Bug ID: 115022
Summary: -fstrub=disable and -minline-memops-threshold have a -
in the index
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114528
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115021
Bug ID: 115021
Summary: [14/15 regression] unnecessary spill for vpternlog
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115014
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114980
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114980
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21051de4bed3d541804bf965cbdc3e8047698777
commit r14-10192-g21051de4bed3d541804bf965cbdc3e8047698777
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114980
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f75806ec63ec1af2d76a194e5fa73e114b2b8857
commit r15-355-gf75806ec63ec1af2d76a194e5fa73e114b2b8857
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Wed May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114978
--- Comment #15 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Chen Chen from comment #14)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #13)
> > (In reply to Chen Chen from comment #12)
> >
> > > No. I used system default gcc.
> >
> > AOSC backports *many* changes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114978
--- Comment #14 from Chen Chen ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #13)
> (In reply to Chen Chen from comment #12)
>
> > No. I used system default gcc.
>
> AOSC backports *many* changes not in upstream GCC 13.2 to their "13.2":
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115020
Bug ID: 115020
Summary: [modules] ICE in import_export_decl for GMF function
definition in partition
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115019
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> /app/example.cpp:36:24: runtime error: negation of
> 0x8000 cannot be represented in type '__int128';
> cast to an unsigned type to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115019
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
/app/example.cpp:36:24: runtime error: negation of
0x8000 cannot be represented in type '__int128';
cast to an unsigned type to negate this value to itself
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115019
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115019
Bug ID: 115019
Summary: wraparound bug with with -O3 and int128
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115005
Ozkan Sezer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58144|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115005
--- Comment #4 from Ozkan Sezer ---
(In reply to Ozkan Sezer from comment #3)
> > There is a jump threading there handling n==0 (aka numbits==-1u) and that is
> > causing the warning.
>
> The thing is, n==0 is not guarding against
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I have reverted the prange enabling patch until the IPA pass is fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #9)
> The patch in comment 6 succeeds for me, but it seems more of a heavy-handed
> band-aid that confirms the symptom, but covers up the problem.
>
> Something
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #10)
> I can test my proposed patch on a cross for avr, but for this testcase on
> rl78-none and rl78-elf, I get:
That was not a testcase but rather a copy of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009
--- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #8)
> And on msp430-elf we're getting a codegen correctness issue on msp430-elf.
> gcc.dg/pr66444.c fails in the simulator. The -O2 code difference looks like:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> For rl78:
> static scalar_int_mode
> rl78_addr_space_address_mode (addr_space_t addrspace)
> {
> switch (addrspace)
> {
> case ADDR_SPACE_GENERIC:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115018
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115018
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
First I can't reproduce it with the official releases GCC 13.2.0.
Second with the trunk, I am not sure if this is a bug or not.
With the trunk with `-O3 -Wall -Wextra -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98056
melg melg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||public.melg8 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
And on msp430-elf we're getting a codegen correctness issue on msp430-elf.
gcc.dg/pr66444.c fails in the simulator. The -O2 code difference looks like:
*** good.s Thu May 9 20:41:37 2024
--- bad.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
For rl78:
static scalar_int_mode
rl78_addr_space_address_mode (addr_space_t addrspace)
{
switch (addrspace)
{
case ADDR_SPACE_GENERIC:
return HImode;
case ADDR_SPACE_NEAR:
return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
rl78 has __far which is a 32bit pointer (the normal ptr size there is 16bit).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|avr |avr, rl78
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115018
Bug ID: 115018
Summary: Incorrect data read/written at -O3 on Arm with 256-bit
SVE SIMD width specified
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115013
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115017
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115017
Bug ID: 115017
Summary: [15 Regression] Ranger ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114995
--- Comment #8 from Pratik Chowdhury ---
> if you just try to compare __builtin_assume_aligned (x, 32) == x, it will
> just fold as always true
Aah. Dead code elimination.
> CCing Aldy/Andrew for whether prange can or could be taught to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114983
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Fixed on trunk so far, will backport to 14.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114983
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:646db3d30bd071a1b671b4f91c9ea2ab7f2be21c
commit r15-351-g646db3d30bd071a1b671b4f91c9ea2ab7f2be21c
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111499
Jack Lloyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lloyd at randombit dot net
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113798
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ignore me, functions can't return arrays.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114415
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e02b5683e77c2b4317b23be72e43b6e6cc6c8e5b
commit r15-350-ge02b5683e77c2b4317b23be72e43b6e6cc6c8e5b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81087
Nicolas Boulenguez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41577|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115010
--- Comment #9 from Thorsten Otto ---
Doing some more testing:
- a cross-compiler build for m68k-suse-linux gives the same error on the
reduced testcase
- the error only occurs when using -m68020-60 or -m68060
- older compiler versions (tested
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115016
Bug ID: 115016
Summary: False positive -Wfree-nonheap-object using std::vector
with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115003
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115003
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bc5afdf14ccf8375f7fb3de2be1121aaf550f8aa
commit r15-349-gbc5afdf14ccf8375f7fb3de2be1121aaf550f8aa
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5046235509caa10a4dc309ca0a8e67892b27750
commit r14-10191-ga5046235509caa10a4dc309ca0a8e67892b27750
Author: Harald
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112659
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> Thinking about this slightly more, we should be able to handle (which LLVM
> does not currently handles):
> ```
> int optb(int v, int b) {
> // b = 8;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113859
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110112
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] gcc |[11/12 Regression] gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109577
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110014
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110700
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE with |[12 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110882
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112889
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |[11/12 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106358
Bug 106358 depends on bug 112790, which changed state.
Bug 112790 Summary: -Wanalyzer-deref-before-check false positives seen in Linux
kernel due to inlining
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112790
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112790
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Summary|[13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] |[11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112969
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] |[11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113253
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] gcc |[11/12 Regression] gcc -g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111289
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 Regression] Unwarranted |Unwarranted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109251
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Summary|[13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114473
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 Regression] ICE: in |ICE: in deref_rvalue, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114408
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115005
--- Comment #3 from Ozkan Sezer ---
> There is a jump threading there handling n==0 (aka numbits==-1u) and that is
> causing the warning.
The thing is, n==0 is not guarding against numbits==-1u: it is guarding
against 0 members of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115015
Bug ID: 115015
Summary: libstdc++ build with '-fno-rtti' is broken
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115010
--- Comment #8 from Thorsten Otto ---
I've never use cvise before, but it gave the attached short source. It inserted
a strange recursive call at the end, but it gives me these error messages:
test.c: In function 'void mul_hwi(bool*)':
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115010
--- Comment #7 from Thorsten Otto ---
Created attachment 58151
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58151=edit
Shortened test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112684
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a6f99aef7c8522471967b171180d9ba4136da90
commit r13-8760-g2a6f99aef7c8522471967b171180d9ba4136da90
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109251
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed026106ce420c7d9dd4d89caac017b6f235e219
commit r13-8756-ged026106ce420c7d9dd4d89caac017b6f235e219
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
```
void
pgm_copystring(const char __memx * p)
{
unsigned char c;
c = *p;
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111289
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67d104f3a032ee64bae335269bf1b8434785cc63
commit r13-8755-g67d104f3a032ee64bae335269bf1b8434785cc63
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111700
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:230f672b3ed0f64c9110ef9dba616c17d713816d
commit r13-8759-g230f672b3ed0f64c9110ef9dba616c17d713816d
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114348
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7a2697733d19a093cbdd0e200ffce069a4bc812
commit r13-8761-gb7a2697733d19a093cbdd0e200ffce069a4bc812
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113253
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c688f6afce4cbb414f5baab1199cd525f309fca
commit r13-8754-g2c688f6afce4cbb414f5baab1199cd525f309fca
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114473
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:810d35a7e054bcbb5b66d2e5924428e445f5fba9
commit r13-8757-g810d35a7e054bcbb5b66d2e5924428e445f5fba9
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:132eb1a210bc7806c4cf188ecac6c08339c94384
commit r13-8752-g132eb1a210bc7806c4cf188ecac6c08339c94384
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110466
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60dcb710b6b4aa22ea96abc8df6dfe9067f3d7fe
commit r13-8745-g60dcb710b6b4aa22ea96abc8df6dfe9067f3d7fe
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112790
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:994477c41049d45b60a4d6db7f624fe5c89860fe
commit r13-8751-g994477c41049d45b60a4d6db7f624fe5c89860fe
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112889
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1cb188cb2ca2ad3f4e837dba2967f323669d36e
commit r13-8750-ga1cb188cb2ca2ad3f4e837dba2967f323669d36e
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114408
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96f7a3694c3e4c72af6258cc9b38bce30e609bee
commit r13-8758-g96f7a3694c3e4c72af6258cc9b38bce30e609bee
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112969
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0593151221ad21c2a67dfda597539c458ab731d8
commit r13-8753-g0593151221ad21c2a67dfda597539c458ab731d8
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109577
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0c52905f666e3d23881f82dbf39466a24f009f4
commit r13-8743-ge0c52905f666e3d23881f82dbf39466a24f009f4
Author: Tim Lange
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110882
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0b13d0860848dd5f2876897ada1e22e4e681e91
commit r13-8747-ga0b13d0860848dd5f2876897ada1e22e4e681e91
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110882
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44968a0e00f656e9bb3e504bb2fa1a8282002015
commit r13-8748-g44968a0e00f656e9bb3e504bb2fa1a8282002015
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108171
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44968a0e00f656e9bb3e504bb2fa1a8282002015
commit r13-8748-g44968a0e00f656e9bb3e504bb2fa1a8282002015
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110700
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0df1ee083434ac00ecb19582b1e5b25e105981b2
commit r13-8746-g0df1ee083434ac00ecb19582b1e5b25e105981b2
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110014
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0c52905f666e3d23881f82dbf39466a24f009f4
commit r13-8743-ge0c52905f666e3d23881f82dbf39466a24f009f4
Author: Tim Lange
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110466
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b38472ffc1e631bd357573b44d956ce16d94e666
commit r13-8744-gb38472ffc1e631bd357573b44d956ce16d94e666
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109577
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ccf8d3e3d26c6ba3d5e11fffeed8d64018e9c060
commit r13-8742-gccf8d3e3d26c6ba3d5e11fffeed8d64018e9c060
Author: Tim Lange
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110112
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89feb3557a018893cfe50c2e07f91559bd3cde2b
commit r13-8741-g89feb3557a018893cfe50c2e07f91559bd3cde2b
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85889
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85889
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46bafd9a6b9b776142e0b1424a6ac02e3a2fd300
commit r15-348-g46bafd9a6b9b776142e0b1424a6ac02e3a2fd300
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115010
--- Comment #6 from Thorsten Otto ---
Oh, yes, of course.
command line that failed:
m68k-atari-mint-g++-14.1.0 -m68020-60 "-fno-PIE" "-c" "-O2"
"-fomit-frame-pointer" "-DIN_GCC" "-fno-exceptions" "-fno-rtti"
"-fasynchronous-unwind-tables" "-W"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114415
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e30211cb0b3a2b88959e9bc40626a17461de52de
commit r13-8740-ge30211cb0b3a2b88959e9bc40626a17461de52de
Author: Vladimir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115004
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note this works with the IR coming out of the C front-end but NOT the IR coming
out from the C++ front-end.
Yes the front-ends are different.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115010
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
