https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115046
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
Oh, maybe this is just because MSVC does not use std::optional but uses
_Defaultabox.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115046
Bug ID: 115046
Summary: meta-recursion when apply join_view with as_const_view
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54179
--- Comment #40 from Sam James ---
That came up at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600#c29.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113882
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113880
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110014
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109577
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115039
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4974fd22730014e337fd7ec2471945ba8afb00e
commit r15-385-gd4974fd22730014e337fd7ec2471945ba8afb00e
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115045
Bug ID: 115045
Summary: views::adjacent_transform<0> is underconstrained
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115044
Bug ID: 115044
Summary: -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak diagnostic in terminal path
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109442
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #19)
> Similar argument can IMO be used for eliding unused memory allocations. It
> is kind of up to std::vector implementation on how many
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114990
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
I reckon it's not something we can fix/implement in a point release of GCC 14,
but hopefully for 15...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109577
--- Comment #9 from nightstrike ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #8)
> Should be fixed for GCC 13 (for the upcoming GCC 13.3) by the above patches.
Did you miss my comment #5 highlighting the need to adjust the declaration of
malloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110014
--- Comment #6 from nightstrike ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5)
> Should be fixed for GCC 13 (for the upcoming GCC 13.3) by the above patch.
Did you miss my comment #3 that highlighted the problem due to assuming that
size_t ==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112728
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109442
--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka ---
Note that the testcase from PR115037 also shows that we are not able to
optimize out dead stores to the vector, which is another quite noticeable
problem.
void
test()
{
std::vector test;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80182
--- Comment #5 from Peter Damianov ---
I submitted a patch for this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/651340.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56556
--- Comment #4 from Gaël Bonithon ---
It would be nice if this could be fixed. I'm currently experimenting with
porting a GTK text editor to Qt6, and it seems that because of this, I can't
name a local variable 'data' in a method of a QWidget
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115043
Bug ID: 115043
Summary: aarch64 locally_streaming function appears to have CFA
note on wrong instruction in prologue
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115038
--- Comment #1 from Christoph Reiter ---
Another downstream report with the same error:
https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/issues/20864
I've c-reduced that as well to:
```
// gcc -c -fno-omit-frame-pointer -O2 repro.cpp
struct d {
d();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54179
--- Comment #39 from Brjd ---
Let me share what I notice in 14.1. Significant improvement in insn-emit.cc and
gimple-match.cc. This is good news.
Insn-recog.cc is much the same and needs ~ 1.6 GiB RAM. Yet, another possible
issue in the future
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114112
Göran Uddeborg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99798
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114760
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Di Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b0919cd147a2b6ccdee2b1217bf0200bdcc87aa
commit r15-380-g1b0919cd147a2b6ccdee2b1217bf0200bdcc87aa
Author: dzhao.ampere
Date: Fri May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #18 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Ah, it looks like seurer already beat me to the preprocessed source.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #17 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #16)
> I'll have look, hopefully on Monday.
Thanks Martin.
To reproduce the problem:
1. Revert this patch:
commit d7bb8eaade3cd3aa70715c8567b4d7b08098e699
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065
--- Comment #26 from Nicolas Boulenguez ---
Created attachment 58181
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58181=edit
v9 fixing a typo in patch 9/9 "select 32 or 64 bits variants"
The "select 32 or 64 bits variants" patch in v8
27 matches
Mail list logo
