https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121764
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note ptr_difference_const can handle some cases which
constant_pointer_difference can't. Mostly dealing with &a[i] and &a[i+1] .
here is a C example that shows constant_pointer_difference is not handling t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121764
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note there is no testcase testing the extended constant_pointer_difference
usage directly. `gcc.dg/torture/pr45636.c` does show the difference if you look
into the forwprop dump.
If I get some time I will a
t& ctx) const {
return std::formatter>::format(
std::make_pair(s.i, s.d), ctx);
}
};
static_assert(std::formattable);
```
The primary error might be:
```
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20250902/include/c++/16.0.0/format:5508:21:
error: static assertion failed
5508 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121764
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #0)
> constant_pointer_difference has:
> /* For pointers p2 and p1 return p2 - p1 if the
>difference is known and constant, otherwise return NULL. */
>
> While p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121764
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121764
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121764
Bug ID: 121764
Summary: constant_pointer_difference and ptr_difference_const
seem to do the same thing
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121763
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #62289|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121761
Bug ID: 121761
Summary: [13/14/15/16 Regression] std::pair deduction guide
doesn't decay functions in C++20 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121763
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |sjames at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121763
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
> Expected noise (and an -fcompare-debug issue fixed):
We should check what is going on with pr43479.c too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121763
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> I'll test gdb next.
No changes, just one timeout in gdb.mi/mi-multi-commands.exp.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121763
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121763
Bug ID: 121763
Summary: Disable -gstatement-frontiers,
-gvariable-location-views by default
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110853
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> This is a regression caused by the new concepts-based constructor
> constraints in gcc 12.
And the analogous std::tuple example started failing after r13-54 (w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121763
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121763
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1)
> Created attachment 62289 [details]
> 0001-gcc-don-t-default-to-gstatement-frontiers-gvariable-.patch
>
(The ChangeLog will need updating before submitting too.)
I'll
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121763
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62289
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62289&action=edit
0001-gcc-don-t-default-to-gstatement-frontiers-gvariable-.patch
This is what I've tested so far.
Overall, the res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527
Jade Lovelace changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at jade dot fyi
--- Comment #23 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
Benjamin Schulz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121762
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
> BUILT_IN_MEMCMP -> pass_gimple_isel
or forwprop with late set
Since that might be easier.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #22 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62288
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62288&action=edit
mathfunctions_mpi.h
(strassen and winograd algorithms fixed... Now i will convert the rest of the
advanced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121762
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121762
Bug ID: 121762
Summary: pass_fold_builtins and pass_optimize_widening_mul and
pass_gimple_isel should be merged or moved other
places
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #21 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62287
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62287&action=edit
datastruct_gpu_memory_functions.h
Hi there, thank you for your advice jacub.
I now have looked at the code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110853
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121742
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110459
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
Thinking about this some more I think we should be able to handle this on the
gimple level before expand. Let me see what we can be done here.
It is related to
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/202
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110853
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121761
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61810
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110853
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This should fix it:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_pair.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_pair.h
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
/// Constructor accepting lvalues of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121761
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121761
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.5.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61810
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr98335.c scan-assembler movzbl
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr98335.c scan-assembler-not movb
I think I understand these:
we have:
```
struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61810
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> Yes, that fixes the issue.
r13-718-gf1a80c05db8b08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87669
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d93be8907fa33f8791409490ed06e45de5c8420
commit r16-3528-g2d93be8907fa33f8791409490ed06e45de5c8420
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Tue Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dascandy at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121707
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 121707, which changed state.
Bug 121707 Summary: Compiler spills std::string internals when used in
consteval context
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121707
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114457
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
ML discussion: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/aLVlJKBqfrLjwsIO@tucnak/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121682
--- Comment #1 from Kang-Che Sung ---
I think this information can be helpful for developers who try to implement
this optimization.
For unsigned integers `x` and `y`...
1. The three bitwise comparisons `(x & y) == y`, `(x | y) == x`, and `(~x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89707
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7dee170ba6d37aba6a9e1fa73711e4e03e42990
commit r16-3529-gf7dee170ba6d37aba6a9e1fa73711e4e03e42990
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Tue Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121263
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121263
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #62285|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121745
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121757
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Reducing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121263
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121263
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> Created attachment 62285 [details]
> Tentative patch
>
> This fixes the issue here, but is not regtested, and touches code from
> Paul...
The code touch wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #13 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62281
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62281&action=edit
main_mpi.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121643
Danijel Zlaus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danijel.zlaus at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #20 from Benjamin Schulz ---
hi Jacub, thats exactly what worries me, and for this reason, my code has a
flag, which says it should often not map the dpdata field at all, and then will
map only strides and extents, while the dpdata f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121759
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108670
Timothy Choi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tinnam.choi at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117639
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> > Does std::log need to set errno?
>
> Yes, it's the same log function as in C.
>
> So log((unsigned)0) sets ERAN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121757
--- Comment #2 from Richard Sandiford ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> No source, but maybe this triggers an idea?
Not much to go on :) Even line numbers for the backtrace would help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121756
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119060
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
I think we should just add P3641 to this BZ, since it's just changing the name
- the functionality is the same. I have a patch for P1494 that has the old
name, so will update that to the revised one and post.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121755
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
```
double f(double a) {
double b = __builtin_nan("");
b = a < b ? a : b;
return b;
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121758
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121755
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ice in lower_bound, at |[14/15/16 Regression] ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #12 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62280
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62280&action=edit
mdspan_omp.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #4 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62272
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62272&action=edit
datastruct.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121753
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Please attach preprocessed source as requested at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs
That's more useful than a dozen separate files that need to be included
correctly, which is why we ask for it in the bug reporti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #14 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62282
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62282&action=edit
cmakelists.txt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #17 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62284
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62284&action=edit
mathfunctions_mpi.h.withfix
here is the "fixed" mathfunctions_mpi.h if you replace mathfunctions_mpi.h with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121753
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edeb5b8258382a58e1ce8e1e79e61386250d42b2
commit r16-3526-gedeb5b8258382a58e1ce8e1e79e61386250d42b2
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121758
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #6 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62274
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62274&action=edit
datastruct_host_memory_functions.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121758
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #16 from Benjamin Schulz ---
sorry for so many attachments,
But if I have not forgotten anything you should now be able to reproduce this
strange message
libgomp: Trying to map into device [0x7ffdd1ebaac0..0x7ffdd1ebaaf0) object w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121746
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #11 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62279
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62279&action=edit
mdspan_data.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #9 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62277
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62277&action=edit
inkernel_mathfunctions.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #15 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62283
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62283&action=edit
datastruct_mpifunctions.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #10 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62278
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62278&action=edit
mathfunctions.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #8 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62276
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62276&action=edit
indiceshelperfunctions.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #7 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62275
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62275&action=edit
datastruct_gpu_memory_functions.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #5 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62273
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62273&action=edit
gpu_mathfunctions.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
Benjamin Schulz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #62268|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62270
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62270&action=edit
main_omp.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62269
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62269&action=edit
main.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121760
Bug ID: 121760
Summary: libgomp: Trying to map into device
[0x7fffa34613f0..0x7fffa3461420) object when
[0x7fffa34613d0..0x7fffa3461400) is already mapped
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121758
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Summary|ice with -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121742
--- Comment #3 from Robin Dapp ---
Fixed on trunk, do we want to backport this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121742
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f957d352bd6f240829226405e9be7960071d1b9c
commit r16-3524-gf957d352bd6f240829226405e9be7960071d1b9c
Author: Robin Dapp
Date: Mon Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121752
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
Summary|g+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121548
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52a0ccca9554dae85a72eb8ed3b8c670bfa30d6d
commit r15-10281-g52a0ccca9554dae85a72eb8ed3b8c670bfa30d6d
Author: Jeff Law
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121755
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121752
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw ---
The manual says:
> @deftypefn {Target Hook} bool TARGET_SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS ...
> ...
> The hook must return true whenever @code{STRICT_ALIGNMENT} is true.
But STRICT_ALIGNMENT must be true because e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121758
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
trunk $ git log d21f10259f64723f..dea668daa2ea8f9d | grep -c "^commit"
36
trunk $
So the bisection should be reasonably easy.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121759
Bug ID: 121759
Summary: Windows/MinGW: formatted reads lose decimal digits
after binary stream read
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121758
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #1 from D
ttached C code does this with recent gcc:
$ /home/dcb42/gcc/results.20250902.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc -w -c -O1
-ftree-loop-vectorize -ftree-loop-distribution -fno-strict-aliasing bug1120.c
during GIMPLE pass: vect
runData/keep/in.19936.c: In function ‘main’:
runData/keep/in.19936.c:1667:5: internal c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121548
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|120763 |
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121757
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121757
Bug ID: 121757
Summary: [15/16 Regression] ICE in
rtl_ssa::clobber_info::recompute_group
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121191
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
