"dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs"
writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
>
> --- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
> (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #6)
>> The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
>>
>>
"dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs"
writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
>
> David Malcolm changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
> Status|NEW
This is the bt of how the C front-end is initializing these
declarations:
#0 set_builtin_decl (implicit_p=,
decl=,
fncode=) at ../../gcc/tree.h:5662
#1 def_builtin_1 (fncode=, name=,
fntype=, libtype=, both_p=,
fallback_p=, nonansi_p=false,
fnattrs=, implicit_p=true,
Following suggestions I'm testing the attached emitting the following
for long branches where LE cannot cover:
subslr, #1
bmi .L2
>From 0cd38cb29829b48f96e8e060e7a875f49236b67b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Corallo
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:21:54 +0100
Subj
Right I'll rework the patch.
Thanks
I'm testing the attached fix.
>From 6de0603f3a5c86396d44250cb34d4451528681b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Corallo
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:21:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm: Add low overhead loop address range check [PR98931]
2021-02-03 Andrea Corallo
* config/arm/ar
"jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98931
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> And the problem is not something not being multiple of 2, but just out of
> range
> jump. The code has:
> 10: f04e e001 dls
I see what's going on, originally this object-size text <= 20 test was
gated with target 'arm_thumb2'.
My patch to exclude LOB targets replaced that with
'arm_thumb2_ok_no_arm_v8_1_lob', unfortunatelly this is relying on
'arm_thumb2_ok' that has a different semantic compared to the original
"marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98615
>
> --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
> (In reply to Andrea Corallo from comment #7)
>> Thanks Martin, I can confirm that also the bootstrap is back okay.
&
Thanks Martin, I can confirm that also the bootstrap is back okay.
Thank you for looking into it! I tried my self but with no success
"acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
>
> --- Comment #9 from Alex Coplan ---
> Thanks for fixing this Andrea! FWIW I can reproduce the ICE with the same
> testcase and options on the head of the GCC 10 branch (contrary to my
"rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs"
writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
>
> --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
> ---
> (In reply to Andrea Corallo from comment #5)
>> "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via
"rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs"
writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
>
> --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
> ---
> (In reply to Andrea Corallo from comment #3)
>> Created attachment 49710 [details]
>&g
rom 03da7bb5c7ad8ab6c25631de5ee1f7b70ea46229 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Corallo
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:17:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix ICE in ira-color
2020-12-08 Andrea Corallo
* ira-color.c (update_costs_from_allocno): Pick the cheapest mode
instead of the smaller one.
---
gcc/ira-color.c |
"akrl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
>
> --- Comment #1 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Hi all,
>
> I can't reproduce this on current master (76a1719f0ff), I guess has been
> fixed in the meanwhile?
As not said I swapped two
"iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" writes:
[...]
> unfortunately, I've not been able to test since you applied this - currently
> bootstrap is broken on aarch64-darwin for reasons outside our control (new
> security provisions stopping the gcc/build/gen* programs from running). If it
>
I believe f5e73de00e9c853ce65333efada7409b0d00f758 should have fixed
this.
Okay to close?
Thanks
Andrea
Patch posted at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/553882.html
"jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94694
>
> --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 48326
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48326=edit
> gcc10-pr94694.patch
>
> Completely untested full patch. Will try to
Hi,
should be fixed now by 8a4436d89bfa:
"aarch64: Fix valid_src_p for use of uninitialized value".
Thanks
Andrea
21 matches
Mail list logo
