--- Comment #17 from H9XLrv5oXVNvHiUI at spambox dot us 2009-12-25 10:42
---
Ok I managed to compile GCC 4.5, applied the patch and compiled the test code
above and everything works fine. Thanks again!
And yes, I imagined it would have been post 4.5 but I meant 'when' from a time
frame
--- Comment #19 from H9XLrv5oXVNvHiUI at spambox dot us 2009-12-25 11:02
---
Yeah I know, but consider that I used this code only in a specific circumstance
and does not constitute a core part of my application (or a foundation of some
higher level mechanism). And I know it's a lot
--- Comment #9 from H9XLrv5oXVNvHiUI at spambox dot us 2009-12-24 14:48
---
I know if you move the function it links (btw your link asks me for an HTTP
login), but if you follow the discussion in the newsgroup it was concluded that
this (the above) is actually perfectly valid standard
--- Comment #11 from H9XLrv5oXVNvHiUI at spambox dot us 2009-12-24 17:23
---
This is possibly the part in which gets confirmed that the code is standard
compliant, although it reports the exact same paragraph you linked (the old
version):
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c
--- Comment #15 from H9XLrv5oXVNvHiUI at spambox dot us 2009-12-24 22:15
---
Hey thank you! I'd like to test the patch if I only I'd be able to compile 4.5
successfully. You have any idea on when could this patch make it to a final
release?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #6 from H9XLrv5oXVNvHiUI at spambox dot us 2009-12-22 21:52
---
Did anyone try this against 4.5? Considering that at this stage only bugfixes
are accepted in the codebase for the next release I'd really like to see a
possible fix to this in. I tried to compile GCC 4.5 on my
--- Comment #5 from H9XLrv5oXVNvHiUI at spambox dot us 2009-09-15 07:37
---
Any update about this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38392
--- Comment #3 from H9XLrv5oXVNvHiUI at spambox dot us 2009-01-31 20:28
---
Sorry for the late reply!
I thought I'd receive an e-mail when one of my reports gets updated, silly me.
Yes I know it works if you switch the order, but that's exactly the point of
the code, to have them
--- Comment #1 from H9XLrv5oXVNvHiUI at spambox dot us 2008-12-16 01:03
---
Any news?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38392
--
H9XLrv5oXVNvHiUI at spambox dot us changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38392
Version: 4.2.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: H9XLrv5oXVNvHiUI at spambox dot us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38392
11 matches
Mail list logo
