--- Comment #7 from Ulrich dot Beingesser at t-systems dot com 2006-10-26
18:38 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The attached code crashes under AIX5.2 and AIX5.3 when compiled with g++
> 4.1.1.
> The effect also occurs using g++ 4.0.3.
>
> It seems that throwing ex
--- Comment #6 from Ulrich dot Beingesser at t-systems dot com 2006-10-20
08:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=12468)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12468&action=view)
backtrace info 3
Shows backtrace info for scenario when program crashes due to s
--- Comment #5 from Ulrich dot Beingesser at t-systems dot com 2006-10-20
08:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=12467)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12467&action=view)
backtrace info case 2
Shows backtrace info for scenario when program crashes due to si
--- Comment #4 from Ulrich dot Beingesser at t-systems dot com 2006-10-20
07:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=12466)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12466&action=view)
gdb backtrace info
Shows complete sequence how program is build, run, crashes and gdb ba
--- Comment #3 from Ulrich dot Beingesser at t-systems dot com 2006-10-19
17:02 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> -lpthread
> I think that is your problem, you should be using -pthread instead.
> Can you try using -pthread instead of -lpthread?
Using -pthread instead of -lpthr
--- Comment #1 from Ulrich dot Beingesser at t-systems dot com 2006-10-19
16:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=12462)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12462&action=view)
Test program that demonstrates the bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29517
compilers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: Ulrich dot Beingesser at t-systems dot com
http://
--- Additional Comments From Ulrich dot Beingesser at t-systems dot com
2005-02-10 13:54 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Works in 3.4.3:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-11/msg00294.html
> So something is wrong, but I don't know because there is not enough
