[Bug target/79646] Typos in vax.opt

2024-04-24 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79646 --- Comment #4 from Abe --- Anybody who wants to chime in, but especially Eric Gallager: please let me know whether or not my patch looks good enough for submission to the gcc-patches mailing list, and if not then _why_ not [please].

[Bug target/79646] Typos in vax.opt

2024-04-24 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79646 --- Comment #3 from Abe --- Created attachment 58032 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58032=edit patch for VAX messages, including localization Squashed patch based on my local Git for this PR.

[Bug target/79646] Typos in vax.opt

2024-04-24 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79646 Abe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug translation/66928] Typos in translatable strings

2024-04-22 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66928 --- Comment #3 from Abe --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1) > are these still there? "No" to all four [please see comment #2, i.e. ].

[Bug translation/66928] Typos in translatable strings

2024-04-22 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66928 Abe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug middle-end/77515] New: GCC fusing of multiply-add ["FMA"] occurring at "-O3" withOUT "-ffast-math" and withOUT "-ffp-contract=fast"

2016-09-07 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com Target Milestone: --- In GCC, on both x86_64 and AArch64, fus

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

2016-01-25 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #8 from Abe --- Slightly more reduced [2 bytes less? ;-)]... __attribute__((noreturn))void V(int); struct R{R(const R&){}}; R f(){V(0);} R c(){V(0);} This might be the most-reduced-possible form of this test case.

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

2016-01-25 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #10 from Abe --- Adding either of the following flags to "-O1" causes the compiler to ICE on the most-reduced test case; adding any of the other "-f<...>" flags I tested [39 of them including the following 2] did not enable the ICE:

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

2016-01-25 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #9 from Abe --- Further-reduced test case [13 bytes shorter: 76 bytes with 1-byte line endings]... [[noreturn]]void V(int); struct R{R(const R&){}}; R f(){V(0);} R c(){V(0);} Additional notes: * removing

[Bug target/69438] New: ICE while trying to cross-compile V8 for AArch64

2016-01-22 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 37441 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37441=edit V8 AArch64 ICE reduced test case preprocessed on Ubuntu 14 host The esse

[Bug target/69438] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

2016-01-22 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69438 --- Comment #3 from Abe --- Great job! Thanks for your contribution[s]. — Abe - Original Message - From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org To: abe_skol...@yahoo.com Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 5:12 PM

[Bug target/69438] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

2016-01-22 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69438 --- Comment #5 from Abe --- Further analysis shows that the ICE is still present after adding a trivial default constructor to the type and making the functions "go through the motions" of creating an object of the requisite type and "return"ing

[Bug target/69438] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

2016-01-22 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69438 --- Comment #7 from Abe --- Further analysis shows that the ICE "needs" the user-provided copy ctor; eliminating it, as shown below, eliminates the ICE too. __attribute__((noreturn)) void V(int); struct R{R(){}}; R f(){V(0); return R();} R

[Bug target/69438] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

2016-01-22 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69438 --- Comment #4 from Abe --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Confirmed, reduced testcase: > __attribute__((noreturn)) void V8_Fatal(int); > struct Register { > Register(const Register& r) {} > }; > Register fp_register() { >

[Bug target/69438] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

2016-01-22 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69438 --- Comment #6 from Abe --- Further analysis shows that the ICE "needs" _both_ of the "V(0)" calls; removing either one from the following eliminates the ICE. __attribute__((noreturn)) void V(int); struct R{R(){} R(const R){}}; R f(){V(0);

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

2016-01-11 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 --- Comment #1 from Abe --- The file "incremental-marking.o" is compiled from the source code at "/src/heap/incremental-marking.cc".

[Bug middle-end/69234] New: recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

2016-01-11 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com Target Milestone: --- Recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC such that the compiled V8 [sans Chrome

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

2016-01-11 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 --- Comment #9 from Abe --- Created attachment 37309 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37309=edit preprocessed part of V8 I will attach a compressed form of the relevant file -- "incremental-marking.cc" from V8, preprocessed

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

2016-01-11 Thread abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 Abe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE