--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-19 15:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=20141)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20141action=view)
reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43437
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-19 15:58 ---
Reproduce with: ./cc1 -g -O a.i -mscore3
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-19 18:41 ---
Err, I was just going to say that. Curse you Jakub. Let me know when you're
looking at something so we don't duplicate efforts. Wait, am I not supposed to
say curse on a PR? Oh well.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-16 11:34 ---
Subject: Bug 42917
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Mar 16 11:33:45 2010
New Revision: 157477
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=157477
Log:
PR tree-optimization/42917
* lambda-code.c
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-16 11:36 ---
Fixed here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00560.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-15 14:35 ---
With the last set of patches to var-tracking, this has been fixed. Closing.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43381
--- Comment #1 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-15 19:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=20112)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20112action=view)
gcc.dg/parm-impl-decl-1.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43381
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 14:29 ---
Increase your stack size.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 14:56 ---
The problem here is a recursive call to gimplify_stmt in gimplify_cond_expr
with the true/false statements. This would only happen on thousands of nested
ifs.
Should this really be a P2? Can't we change
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 17:18 ---
Jakub: Agreed. How can we resolve/close/etc this bug?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40760
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-15 15:18 ---
Subject: Bug 42185
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Dec 15 15:17:46 2009
New Revision: 155256
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155256
Log:
PR graphite/42185
* graphite-sese-to-poly.c
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-15 15:18 ---
That's because I hadn't committed. Tests pass. Committing and closing.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-14 16:38 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg00716.html
Patch fixes both testcases, but the second testcase has another unrelated SSA
bug.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-27 11:18 ---
Subject: Bug 41451
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Oct 27 11:18:12 2009
New Revision: 153588
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=153588
Log:
PR bootstrap/41451
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-27 11:19 ---
fixed
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #11 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 00:28 ---
Subject: Bug 40660
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Aug 25 00:27:52 2009
New Revision: 151069
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151069
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/40660
* trans-io.c (build_dt
--- Comment #7 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-21 21:11 ---
Sorry I was out on vacation. I will take a look.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40660
--- Comment #8 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 12:31 ---
This patch fixes the remaining failures.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-07/msg00484.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40435
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #7 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-17 13:00 ---
Fix for func-ptr-conv-1.c failure.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg01344.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-13 21:28 ---
Wshadow-3.c and pr36902.c are definitely mine. My original request for
approval indicated that these were problems with fold being location agnostic,
and that I would be addressing the issues post merge. The func
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-09 14:50 ---
Fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-09/msg00710.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-12 14:05 ---
Subject: Bug 35746
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Aug 12 14:04:18 2008
New Revision: 139018
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=139018
Log:
PR c/35746
* gimplify.c (gimplify_expr): Do
--- Comment #10 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-12 14:06 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg00778.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-12 14:21 ---
Still can't reproduce. What target are you compiling for?
Verify my steps below, and see if there's any discrepancy in what you are
doing.
anquetil:/build/43/gcc$ ./cc1 --version
GNU C (GCC) version 4.3.2 20080812
--- Comment #13 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-12 15:02 ---
Nope, still can't reproduce with i686-pc-linux-gnu, or with x86-64-linux using
-m32. FWIW, Jakub can't reproduce it either.
Can anyone beside Volker reproduce this? If nobody else can't, I'm inclined to
say it's
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-08 23:23 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I can still reproduce this on the 4.3 branch as of 2008-08-07.
On mainline the bug disappeared between 2008-07-29 and 2008-08-02.
I see the error, but there is no longer an ICE.
$ ./cc1
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 10:00 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg00322.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 10:18 ---
I can no longer reproduce this on either the 4.3 branch or mainline. Volker,
can you check on your end?
If there is no update, I will close at the end of the week.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 10:26 ---
Subject: Bug 35432
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Aug 6 10:25:22 2008
New Revision: 138793
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138793
Log:
PR middle-end/35432
* gimplify.c
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 10:32 ---
Subject: Bug 35432
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Aug 6 10:31:22 2008
New Revision: 138794
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138794
Log:
PR middle-end/35432
* gimplify.c
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 10:43 ---
Subject: Bug 35432
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Aug 6 10:41:39 2008
New Revision: 138796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138796
Log:
PR middle-end/35432
* gimplify.c
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 10:43 ---
Fixed on mainline, 4.3, and 4.2.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 15:24 ---
I can no longer reproduce this bug on either the 4.3 branch or mainline-- for
both C and C++. If there is no update on this in the next week, I will close
the bug.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #12 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-04 14:50 ---
Subject: Bug 34448
Author: aldyh
Date: Fri Jan 4 14:49:28 2008
New Revision: 131323
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131323
Log:
PR tree-optimization/34448
PR tree-optimization
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-04 14:50 ---
Subject: Bug 34465
Author: aldyh
Date: Fri Jan 4 14:49:28 2008
New Revision: 131323
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131323
Log:
PR tree-optimization/34448
PR tree-optimization
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 14:56 ---
Yes. I submitted a patch which fixed all the related problems, and Diego
wanted some refactoring of the code. I am working on it as we speak. Diego
has said that if the patch is too much of a hassle, the current
--- Comment #10 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 16:10 ---
Testing a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34448
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 21:00 ---
Shouldn't that be:
if (valid_const_initializer
num_nonzero_elements 1
TREE_READONLY (object)
TREE_CODE (object) == VAR_DECL
!DECL_NAME(object) here
--- Comment #8 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 00:12 ---
Gosh, I was going through a similar path, and was horribly depressed at the
code duplication. I'll come up with some abstraction which we can use in both
gimplify_init_ctor and gimplify_modify_expr_rhs. Thanks
--- Comment #12 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-12 11:18 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg00525.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-12 23:33 ---
I'll take care of this.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-11 19:04 ---
testing a patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32901
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-04 19:30 ---
Ok, here's the deal.
gimplify_init_constructor promotes the constructor to a static because it is a
const aggregate variable, here:
/* If a const aggregate variable is being initialized
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-04 23:43 ---
TER would never see the consecutive initializations because the code I pointed
out in gimplify_init_constructor() keeps the gimplifier from splitting up the
constructor into consecutive MODIFY_EXPRs.
After
--- Comment #10 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-04 23:54 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
E.g. for PR22141 it would help too (for PR32901 only if the constructor
gimplification heuristics is also adjusted).
Ok, I see what you mean. We adjust the heuristic as I've suggested
--- Comment #18 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-03 23:21 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg01651.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-29 11:56 ---
I am testing this patch, and will post to gcc-patches when they finish.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33713
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-10 14:14 ---
This has nothing to do with my patch. When I remove the cse.c patch, the
-ftree-vectorize goes away, so it's probably related to that patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31116
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 20:05 ---
Subject: Bug 30375
Author: aldyh
Date: Fri Mar 9 20:05:08 2007
New Revision: 122758
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122758
Log:
PR tree-optimization/30375
* tree-ssa-dse.c
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-14 18:50 ---
I believe this is addressed by Roger's patch which was approved yesterday
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg00353.html), though I don't think
the final revision has been committed.
--
http
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 00:43 ---
I'll look at this.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-06 14:03 ---
What is the actual triplet, and can you provide a .i file?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30079
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-06 22:10 ---
Fixed here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00425.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 22:32 ---
This still fails because it hasn't been fixed ;-). My patch for
-feliminate-unused-debug-types only handled casts. It needs further front-end
work to handle enums. At least the infrastructure is in place
--- Comment #8 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 15:51 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Did I mention this fails on powerpc-darwin?
How so?
pantani:/build/trunk/clean/gcc$ ./cc1 -quiet -g a.c -gstabs
pantani:/build/trunk/clean/gcc$ grep foo a.s.stabs
foo:T(0,19)=s4i
--- Comment #10 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 16:05 ---
darwin enables -feliminate-unused-debug-symbols by default.
You mean darwin does NOT enable the option by default, right?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21391
--- Comment #12 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 16:14 ---
No, there are two different options, and the other one is the stabs version
and not the dwarf2 version.
I'm confused. What options do you feed to the compiler that exhibit the bug,
so I can look
--- Comment #14 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-27 00:01 ---
-gstabs+ -feliminate-unused-debug-symbols
This is a different option than -feliminate-unused-debug-types, so I don't see
how this applies.
The patch I wrote was for eliminate-unused-debug-TYPES. I suppose
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 01:38 ---
Patch that fixes the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00380.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21391
--- Comment #1 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-08 19:05 ---
I can reproduce the runtime error, but not the compile error.
pantani:/tmp/2$ type gcc
gcc is /tmp/2/bin/gcc
pantani:/tmp/2$ gcc a.c -fopenmp
pantani:/tmp/2$ ./a.out
./a.out: error while loading shared libraries
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 19:20 ---
Subject: Bug 26238
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Mar 7 19:20:32 2006
New Revision: 111818
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=111818
Log:
PR gomp/26238
* doc/passes.texi (Tree-SSA passes
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-21 21:53 ---
Subject: Bug 26234
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Feb 21 21:53:21 2006
New Revision: 111345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=111345
Log:
PR libgomp/26234
* doc/install.texi (Configuration
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-21 21:53 ---
Mine
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-21 21:56 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01706.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-20 22:18 ---
Mine
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 11:37 ---
Subject: Bug 24138
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Dec 7 11:37:53 2005
New Revision: 108157
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108157
Log:
PR C++/24138
* tree.c (integer_all_onesp): Always
--- Comment #10 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 11:38 ---
fixed on 4.1 branch as well
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-06 19:45 ---
Subject: Bug 24138
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Dec 6 19:45:00 2005
New Revision: 108126
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108126
Log:
PR C++/24138
* tree.c (integer_all_onesp): Always
--- Comment #7 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-06 19:48 ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg01175.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 21:12 ---
We used to allow this, but have now made the warning stricter. This behavior
was done deliberately. See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg00275.html
As is explained in the thread, you can modify
--- Comment #8 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 21:15 ---
See previous comment.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 20:10 ---
I'll take a look at this.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 20:54 ---
What the heck...death by dwarf. I'll take a look at this.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 02:01 ---
I'll take a look at this.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 20:25 ---
I'll take a look at this.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #25 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 21:16 ---
Bonzini:
Perhaps both approaches would be even better. We definitely should handle the
transformed vector, because theoretically it's still easy to generate. And
adding the extra check you mention would be icing
--- Comment #1 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 12:43 ---
Subject: Bug 24505
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Oct 31 12:43:44 2005
New Revision: 106269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=106269
Log:
PR gomp/24505
* c-omp.c (c_finish_omp_for
--- Comment #20 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 12:48 ---
I'll take this.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 12:52 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01718.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 20:08 ---
Does anyone have the un-preprocessed source for this bug? I'm seeing some
assignments that should have casts, and I wan't to rule out bogus input.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24230
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24230
--- Additional Comments From aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-11 14:42
---
I have just backported to the 4.0 branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10611
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 17:22
---
Fixed with patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg01630.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-10 17:06
---
Fixed in mainline. Waiting for 4.0 freeze to be lifted to commit there.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg00959.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-11 00:20
---
Fixed on mainline. Backported to 3.4. 4.0 patch will be committed once the
branch is opened.
--
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
