[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #17 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2012-04-05 12:05:01 UTC --- I spent quite a bit of time today looking at libpthread and can't spot a problem in pthread_mutex_lock and pthread_mutex_unlock. I wonder if the problem

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2012-04-04 09:57:51 UTC --- I also see the same 64-bit failure on r186130. A lot harder to reproduce than the 32-bit one I originally reported (which is still there on r186130). Likely

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2012-04-04 11:12:56 UTC --- Heh. We're even. I didn't notice yours was a 64-bit failure until you told me your gcc revision number.

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #10 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2012-04-04 14:20:57 UTC --- I caught the 64-bit failure in the act. It's dying on the gcc_assert in unwind-dw2.c:_Unwind_SetSpColumn, with the value read from dwarf_reg_size_table[1] being

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #12 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2012-04-04 22:27:43 UTC --- glibc/ntpl/pthread_once.c: static int once_lock = LLL_LOCK_INITIALIZER; int __pthread_once (once_control, init_routine) pthread_once_t *once_control

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #13 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2012-04-04 23:02:34 UTC --- Huh, so glibc has a powerpc specific pthread_once, and that one has a different bug. Lack of lwsync before atomic_increment (once_control);

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #14 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2012-04-05 04:00:07 UTC --- Created attachment 27094 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27094 config patch Yes, the 32-bit failure seems to be gone if we use the gcc builtin

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2012-04-04 01:11:47 UTC --- Interesting. gcc revision? I've held back on svn update after hearing that richi had broken the tree for powerpc. The uncaught exception might be an eh_frame

[Bug libstdc++/52839] New: double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 Bug #: 52839 Summary: double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/52828] powerpc -m32 -Os writes register saves below stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52828 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug target/52828] New: powerpc -m32 -Os writes register saves below stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52828 Bug #: 52828 Summary: powerpc -m32 -Os writes register saves below stack Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/52721] New: segfault in vect_init_vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52721 Bug #: 52721 Summary: segfault in vect_init_vector Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/52721] segfault in vect_init_vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52721 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED Ever

[Bug target/52163] [4.7 regression] 64bit powerpc libgcc is missing exported symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot

[Bug target/52107] IBM 128bit long double constant loaded inefficiently

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52107 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/52107] IBM 128bit long double constant loaded inefficiently

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52107 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/51982] Shrink-wrapping opportunity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51982 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|amodra at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot

[Bug target/52107] New: IBM 128bit long double constant loaded inefficiently

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52107 Bug #: 52107 Summary: IBM 128bit long double constant loaded inefficiently Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/52107] IBM 128bit long double constant loaded inefficiently

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52107 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2012-02-03 23:17:36 UTC --- .tc generates an 8-byte word in both cases, so no space saved in the toc. This bit of code in rs6000_emit_move does the loads in DImode, then cse1 shows the toc

[Bug target/52107] IBM 128bit long double constant loaded inefficiently

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52107 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot

[Bug middle-end/51926] libstdc++ iterator store bigendian bitfield related

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51926 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/51926] New: libstdc++ iterator store bigendian bitfield related

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51926 Bug #: 51926 Summary: libstdc++ iterator store bigendian bitfield related Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/51926] libstdc++ iterator store bigendian bitfield related

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51926 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-linux

[Bug driver/51857] gcc -flto ignores -B

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51857 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug driver/51857] New: gcc -flto ignores -B

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51857 Bug #: 51857 Summary: gcc -flto ignores -B Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libgomp/51298] libgomp team_barrier locking failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51298 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-12-15 13:45:20 UTC --- I expect all of the libgomp bugs I recently fixed will affect some other processors, eg. Alpha, IA64, and Sparc in some memory modes. I know PR51376 won't affect

[Bug libgomp/51298] libgomp team_barrier locking failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51298 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-12-15 07:57:44 UTC --- Yes, this bug and more are still in gcc-4.6. I haven't had time to look at backporting any of my libgomp fixes.

[Bug libgomp/51376] libgomp taskwait failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51376 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/50906] e500 exception unwinding under -Os causes SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libgomp/51376] libgomp taskwait failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51376 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc-linux

[Bug libgomp/51376] New: libgomp taskwait failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51376 Bug #: 51376 Summary: libgomp taskwait failure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libgomp/51249] semaphore implemetation for linux leaves threads blocked

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51249 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libgomp/51298] libgomp team_barrier locking failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51298 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libgomp/51298] libgomp team_barrier locking failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51298 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug libgomp/51298] New: libgomp team_barrier locking failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51298 Bug #: 51298 Summary: libgomp team_barrier locking failures Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug libgomp/51249] semaphore implemetation for linux leaves threads blocked

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51249 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-11-21 22:21:13 UTC --- Sorry, I misread the code. Indeed, the mutex will be left at 2. I'm chasing a frustratingly elusive locking bug. Symptoms are that one or two libgomp tests fail

[Bug libgomp/51249] New: semaphore implemetation for linux leaves threads blocked

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51249 Bug #: 51249 Summary: semaphore implemetation for linux leaves threads blocked Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgomp/51249] semaphore implemetation for linux leaves threads blocked

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51249 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/51051] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/51086] [4.7 regression] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.c:3437

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51086 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/51086] [4.7 regression] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.c:3437

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51086 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/51051] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/45807] Lying eh_frame r2 save info causes crashes with static libgcc_eh and libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45807 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/47487] ICE in rs6000_output_function_epilogue, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:21782 building 64bit libgo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47487 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282 --- Comment #25 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-11-08 05:21:57 UTC --- Actually, the testcase in #1 still fails on gcc-4.4. Looks like gcc-4.4 (and earlier) need to use a bigger blockage.

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/50906] e500 exception unwinding under -Os causes SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25702|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug target/50906] e500 exception unwinding under -Os causes SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25703|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug target/50906] e500 exception unwinding under -Os causes SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-11-03 12:54:32 UTC --- Created attachment 25702 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25702 Proposed mainline fix

[Bug target/50906] e500 exception unwinding under -Os causes SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-11-03 12:55:29 UTC --- Created attachment 25703 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25703 gcc-4.6 fix

[Bug target/50906] e500 exception unwinding under -Os causes SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906 --- Comment #10 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-11-03 12:59:10 UTC --- Please test out these patches. bootstrap and regression tests with -Os in BOOT_CFLAGS on spe would be ideal. I'll be running a powerpc-linux regression test

[Bug target/50906] e500 exception unwinding under -Os causes SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/50906] e500 exception unwinding under -Os causes SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/50906] e500 exception unwinding under -Os causes SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-11-02 00:05:42 UTC --- bl _save64gpr_24 .loc 1 17 0 mr 31,4 .cfi_offset 31, -100 .cfi_offset 1231, -104 .cfi_offset 30, -108 .cfi_offset 1230, -112

[Bug bootstrap/50738] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 180028 on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50738 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/50467] Compiler can move stack cleanup before last memory reference involving the stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50467 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64-linux |powerpc-linux

[Bug lto/50367] -flto and -Wl,--as-needed combination removes some needed libraries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50367 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/50341] New: calls via function pointer wrongly scheduled giving invalid TOC pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50341 Bug #: 50341 Summary: calls via function pointer wrongly scheduled giving invalid TOC pointer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug target/50341] calls via function pointer wrongly scheduled giving invalid TOC pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50341 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/50191] Strange debug insn produced for TOC compiling 416.gamess with profile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50191 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/50191] Strange debug insn produced for TOC compiling 416.gamess with profile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50191 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282 --- Comment #15 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-08-05 16:23:04 UTC --- Created attachment 24922 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24922 belt and braces fix for rs6000.c This fix goes overboard to guard against

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282 --- Comment #16 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-08-05 16:29:02 UTC --- Created attachment 24923 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24923 minimal rs6000.c fix This fix just ensures we have a stack tie at the ABI_V4

[Bug rtl-optimization/49972] New: Invalid .gcc_except_table with -freorder-blocks-and-partition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49972 Summary: Invalid .gcc_except_table with -freorder-blocks-and-partition Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/49972] Invalid .gcc_except_table with -freorder-blocks-and-partition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49972 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-08-04 10:08:58 UTC --- Created attachment 24913 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24913 faulty assembly

[Bug rtl-optimization/49972] Invalid .gcc_except_table with -freorder-blocks-and-partition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49972 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-08-04 10:34:27 UTC --- Entries in the call-site table for start of the instructions for the current call site, and the pointer to the landing pad for this sequence of instructions

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] [4.7 Regression] segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] [4.7 Regression] segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] New: segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 Summary: segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo:

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] [4.7 Regression] segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 Target

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] [4.7 Regression] segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-08-02 15:29:57 UTC --- So, rebuild_jump_labels doesn't add back this JUMP_LABEL, because mark_jump_label does as its comment says: If INSN is a JUMP_INSN and there is at least one

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] [4.7 Regression] segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-08-03 01:29:54 UTC --- Bernd, that looks very similar to the patch I started to write. Then I saw the comment in mark_jump_label_1 /* Do not change a previous setting

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] [4.7 Regression] segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-08-03 02:43:18 UTC --- Bernd, with your patch applied, bootstrap dies here: In file included from /home/amodra/src/gcc-virgin/libgcc/../libdecnumber/decQuad.c:140:0: /home/amodra/src

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] [4.7 Regression] segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-08-03 03:07:13 UTC --- The lurking problem being that copy_rtx_if_shared_1 needs to leave RETURN shared, and I guess mark_used_flags doesn't need to do anything with RETURN too.

[Bug tree-optimization/49601] [4.7 Regression] ICE at ipa-inline-analysis.c:1188

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49601 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug other/49665] 'defined in discarded section' link failures on cpu2006 benchmarks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49665 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug other/49665] 'defined in discarded section' link failures on cpu2006 benchmarks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49665 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/49383] [4.7 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure due to ice in cgraph_only_called_directly_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/49383] [4.7 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure due to ice in cgraph_only_called_directly_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/49383] [4.7 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure due to ice in cgraph_only_called_directly_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot

[Bug target/46770] Replace .ctors/.dtors with .init_array/.fini_array on targets supporting them

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot

[Bug target/48900] unnecessary duplicate __tls_get_addr calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48900 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/48900] New: unnecessary duplicate __tls_get_addr calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48900 Summary: unnecessary duplicate __tls_get_addr calls Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug target/48900] unnecessary duplicate __tls_get_addr calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48900 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc*-linux

[Bug target/45844] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr45714-b.f -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-03-28 01:44:36 UTC --- I an planning to backport to 4.6.1

[Bug target/47487] ICE in rs6000_output_function_epilogue, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:21782 building 64bit libgo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47487 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/45844] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr45714-b.f -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9 |powerpc-apple-darwin9

[Bug target/45844] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr45714-b.f -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |amodra at gmail dot

[Bug target/48032] PowerPC64 -mcmodel=medium invalid ld offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48032 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/45844] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr45714-b.f -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/48032] New: PowerPC64 -mcmodel=medium invalid ld offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48032 Summary: PowerPC64 -mcmodel=medium invalid ld offset Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug target/48032] PowerPC64 -mcmodel=medium invalid ld offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48032 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-linux

[Bug target/47986] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails with non-delegitimized UNSPEC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47986 Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails with non-delegitimized UNSPEC Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/47986] gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails with non-delegitimized UNSPEC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47986 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2011-03-04 11:24:02 UTC --- I can easily fix rs6000_delegitimize_address to handle this debug expression, but I suspect that would be papering over the real problem, the duplicate debug_insns.

[Bug target/47986] gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails with non-delegitimized UNSPEC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47986 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug target/47986] gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c fails with non-delegitimized UNSPEC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47986 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/47935] PowerPC64 -mcmodel=medium invalid lwa offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47935 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/47935] New: PowerPC64 -mcmodel=medium invalid lwa offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47935 Summary: PowerPC64 -mcmodel=medium invalid lwa offset Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >