--- Comment #12 from anirkko at insel dot ch 2007-05-07 10:29 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
...
Yes, I'm going to reopen it, but I'm not sure someone will tackle it.
The culprit is -finline-functions:
The gcc man page says -O3 adds only 3 additional options. My bootstrapping
script
--- Comment #13 from anirkko at insel dot ch 2007-05-07 10:33 ---
(In addition to comment #12)
PS: The above was done on sparcv9 (UltraSparc-III)
with Solaris 8. Thus, the bug is confirmed on
several machines with several versions of Solaris
and several versions of binutils
--- Comment #11 from anirkko at insel dot ch 2007-04-30 09:41 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Therefore, I still think there is a bug in -O3. (alternatively, in the
combination of the two). Would you consider reopening this bug if it was
-O3?
(In this case, I might re-run
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: anirkko at insel dot ch
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.6
GCC host
--- Comment #9 from anirkko at insel dot ch 2007-04-23 11:35 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
The bootstrap works fine with all flags equal to '-O2'
Great, thanks for the confirmation.
Still worrysome, because somewhere in the installation instructions, it is
recommended
--- Comment #7 from anirkko at insel dot ch 2007-04-18 14:24 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Can you try without setting the CFLAGS, etc. because what might be happening
is
the base compiler miscompiling the new compiler?
The bootstrap works fine with all flags equal to '-O2'
Still
--- Comment #4 from anirkko at insel dot ch 2007-04-16 09:15 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Can you try without setting the CFLAGS, etc. because what might be happening
is
the base compiler miscompiling the new compiler?
Tried something slightly different: because this happened
--- Comment #5 from anirkko at insel dot ch 2007-04-16 09:21 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Do really have a SuperSPARC? If no, remove the -mcpu=supersparc option, it is
totally untested these days. If so, I'd suggest to stick with a 3.x compiler
on this presumably old machine
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: anirkko at insel dot ch
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.6
GCC host triplet: sparc-sun
--- Comment #1 from anirkko at insel dot ch 2007-04-13 22:46 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31523 ***
--
anirkko at insel dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from anirkko at insel dot ch 2007-04-13 22:46 ---
*** Bug 31565 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31523
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: anirkko at insel dot ch
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.6
GCC host triplet: sparc-sun
12 matches
Mail list logo
