http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
--- Comment #10 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-10-25 02:31:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 24 18:09:21 2011
New Revision: 180398
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
--- Comment #11 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-10-25 02:33:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
Compile it as:
$avr-gcc -mmcu=atxmega128a1 -g -gdwarf-2 test.c -S
You are left alone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
--- Comment #6 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-10-24 04:18:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Please probide a testcase according to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#need
- Please, no external includes
Sorry! I thought I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
--- Comment #7 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-10-24 04:21:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 25583
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25583
Relevant testcase that is compilable
Compile it as:
$avr-gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
--- Comment #3 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-10-21 13:07:33 UTC ---
Can someone confirm this and fix this? We are blocked otherwise :-(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
Bug #: 50816
Summary: [4.6.1] Discriminators are emitted in DWARF 2 format
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
--- Comment #1 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-10-21 03:17:20 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-10/msg00348.html
The fix in trunk should be backported to gcc-4_6-branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||AVR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775
--- Comment #3 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-08-02 05:54:03 UTC ---
I thought P3 should be OK. But P4 ...?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775
Summary: [4.6.1 Regression on AVR] ICE in based_loc_descr
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775
--- Comment #1 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-07-18 09:01:36 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17906
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35432
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49029
Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #33 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-20 05:00:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)
Fixed with:
2011-06-17 Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com
Backport from mainline
2011-03-22
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #30 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-17 07:07:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 24552
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24552
Make log for gcc-4_6-branch for comment 28
(In reply to comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #27 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-16 06:34:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
The testcase at the head of the PR is now fixed.
I could build avr-gcc from trunk and run couple of simple testcases
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #28 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-16 06:35:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
The testcase at the head of the PR is now fixed.
I could build avr-gcc from trunk and run couple of simple testcases
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #18 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-14 07:00:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Created attachment 24512 [details]
loosen constraints on register elimination
This seems to fix the problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #25 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-15 02:37:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
The testcase at the head of the PR is now fixed.
For the 4.6 branch, this required also backporting
(Assuming
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #12 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-13 06:53:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #10)
I don't think initial_return_save() is called now. It passes the
compilation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #13 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-13 07:13:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
function returns true. As a result, dwarf_debug_frame_expr() is always called!
Typo - dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #15 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-13 07:55:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
Can you change the state to NEW and raise the severity to blocker? I don't
have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #10 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-10 07:37:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
I agree. But this does not fully solve the problem either.
INCOMING_RETURN_ADDR_RTX is being
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #5 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-09 16:54:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Created attachment 24475 [details]
patch
Here's an untested patch. Does this fix the problem for you? Naturally
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #6 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-09 17:00:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Created attachment 24475 [details]
patch
Here's an untested patch. Does this fix the problem for you?
I'll try
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #8 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-10 04:13:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Created attachment 24478 [details]
alternate patch
This patch is probably better.
I agree. But this does not fully
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47597
--- Comment #2 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-03 07:20:44 UTC ---
Patch in trunk revision 171296
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c?r1=171150r2=171296diff_format=h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17994
--- Comment #8 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-02-16 08:20:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 23360
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23360
Initial fix that emits the output shown in comment 5
(In reply
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47696
Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47597
Summary: ICE: call frame debugging information is not handled
when case is post_dec
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47597
Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||AVR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17994
--- Comment #6 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2010-12-29 13:35:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Looks like to get call-stack debug info, all we require to do is define
INCOMING_RETURN_ADDR_RTX. In AVR, since
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17994
Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17994
--- Comment #5 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2010-12-29 07:08:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
And this gives an ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr(). Modifying the above
function to pre decrement the stack pointer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42240
--- Comment #18 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2010-11-10 10:38:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
(In reply to comment #14)
Created attachment 22339 [details] [details]
Initial patch to fix the bug
BB
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42240
--- Comment #14 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2010-11-09 10:24:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 22339
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22339
Initial patch to fix the bug
BB reordering pass is suppressed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42240
--- Comment #15 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2010-11-09 10:26:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Implement TARGET_CANNOT_MODIFY_JUMPS_P and respect epilogue_completed and
cfun-machine-is_naked. This will stop BB
38 matches
Mail list logo
