[Bug fortran/108529] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:478

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108529 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/108453] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_use_stmts, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:5361 since r6-3704-g2b3f52a2d0fb22ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108453 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/108651] Array Constructor with [type-spec:: fails to apply to all values, eg x = [integer(int64):: 1,2,3,4]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108651 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #5 from

[Bug fortran/108609] New test case gfortran.dg/pr108527.f90 in r13-5479-g22afa4947584c7 ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108609 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-31

[Bug fortran/108592] In IF statements -Winteger-division is repeated 4 times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108592 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/108592] In IF statements -Winteger-division is repeated 4 times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108592 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-29 Ever

[Bug fortran/108529] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:478

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108529 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE

[Bug fortran/108453] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_use_stmts, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:5361 since r6-3704-g2b3f52a2d0fb22ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108453 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/108453] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_use_stmts, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:5361 since r6-3704-g2b3f52a2d0fb22ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108453 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103506] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_free_namespace, at fortran/symbol.c:4039 since r10-2798-ge68a35ae4a65d2b3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103506 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/108544] ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.cc:6135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108544 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone

[Bug fortran/108544] ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.cc:6135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108544 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/108544] ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.cc:6135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108544 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I played a little and found a variation of testcase pr96102.f90 that was silently accepted but is rejected by Intel, NAG, Cray, NVidia: module m type mytype integer :: i end type type

[Bug fortran/108544] ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.cc:6135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108544 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/108528] [13 Regression] ICE in gfc_compare_array_spec(): Array spec clobbered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108528 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/108528] [13 Regression] ICE in gfc_compare_array_spec(): Array spec clobbered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108528 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/108527] [13 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_int(): Bad expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108527 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.5.0 Known to fail

[Bug fortran/108527] [13 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_int(): Bad expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108527 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Assignee

[Bug fortran/108527] [13 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_int(): Bad expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108527 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch in comment#2 regtests cleanly. I can package it and submit if you agree.

[Bug fortran/108529] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:478

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108529 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/108528] [13 Regression] ICE in gfc_compare_array_spec(): Array spec clobbered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108528 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/108529] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:478

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108529 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC

[Bug fortran/108527] [13 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_int(): Bad expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108527 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > This fixes all testcases. These two helper functions can indicate > a problem occurs, so instead of asserting on (a->ts.type != BT_INTEGER) >

[Bug fortran/108527] [13 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_int(): Bad expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108527 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-24

[Bug fortran/108434] [12/13 Regression] ICE in class_allocatable, at fortran/expr.cc:5000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108434 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The reported issue should be fixed for gcc-13 and on 12-branch. There is another potential issue (see comment#1) which might be related to this one or not. Keeping this PR open until the

[Bug fortran/108502] ICE in gfc_check_dependency, at fortran/dependency.cc:1295

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108502 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/108501] [13 Regression] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2941

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108501 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/108502] ICE in gfc_check_dependency, at fortran/dependency.cc:1295

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108502 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-23

[Bug fortran/108501] [13 Regression] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2941

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108501 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code, |ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug fortran/108501] [13 Regression] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2941

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108501 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 54330 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54330&action=edit Patch for the ICE in get_expr_storage_size

[Bug fortran/108501] [13 Regression] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2941

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108501 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-23

[Bug fortran/108434] [12/13 Regression] ICE in class_allocatable, at fortran/expr.cc:5000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108434 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/108454] ICE in gfc_trans_common, at fortran/trans-common.cc:1385

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108454 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-18

[Bug fortran/106731] ICE on automatic array of derived type with DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #12

[Bug fortran/107397] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_arith_plus, at fortran/arith.cc:654

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107397 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary

[Bug fortran/107214] [13 Regression] ICE: base pointer cycle detected since r13-2661-gb57abd072dd319a7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107214 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/108434] [12/13 Regression] ICE in class_allocatable, at fortran/expr.cc:5000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108434 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/108421] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108421 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Resolution

[Bug fortran/108420] [13 Regression] ICE in check_charlen_present, at fortran/iresolve.cc:98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108420 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/108421] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108421 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/108420] [13 Regression] ICE in check_charlen_present, at fortran/iresolve.cc:98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108420 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm regtesting the following patch which fixes both cases: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/iresolve.cc b/gcc/fortran/iresolve.cc index 711e9178ad4..33794f0a858 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/iresol

[Bug fortran/108421] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108421 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status

[Bug fortran/108420] [13 Regression] ICE in check_charlen_present, at fortran/iresolve.cc:98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108420 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/107508] Invalid bounds due to bogus reallocation on assignment with KIND=4 characters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107508 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/108369] FM509 Fails to compile with error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108369 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/97345] FE passes do_subscript leaks gmp memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97345 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/97345] FE passes do_subscript leaks gmp memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97345 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #3) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > > + > > + mpz_clear (do_start); > > + mpz_clear (do_end); > > +

[Bug fortran/97345] FE passes do_subscript leaks gmp memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97345 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/108131] [10/11 Regression] Incorrect bound calculation when bound intrinsic used in size expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108131 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug libfortran/108336] Repeatable random_numbers with openmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108336 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- There is one flaw with the testcase: when OMP_NUM_THREADS > n1, array elements threadval(n1+1:OMP_NUM_THREADS) are filled with undefined values. When I replace the line if(omp_get_thread_

[Bug fortran/108131] [10/11 Regression] Incorrect bound calculation when bound intrinsic used in size expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108131 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11 Regression

[Bug fortran/69604] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.c:159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone

[Bug fortran/108233] New: [Coarray] bcast to non-allocatable COMPLEX scalar coarray may generate wrong result

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Separated from PR69604: program p implicit none real:: r = 2.0, x[*] = 5.0 complex :: c

[Bug fortran/69604] ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.c:159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug fortran/107144] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:1623

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107144 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Placing the subroutine into a module avoids ICE. Could this pr be related to pr107141?

[Bug fortran/95375] ICE in add_use_op, Error: mismatching comparison operand types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95375 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/95375] ICE in add_use_op, Error: mismatching comparison operand types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95375 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO since r7-4096-gbf9f15ee55f5b291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.0|10.5

[Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO since r7-4096-gbf9f15ee55f5b291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO since r7-4096-gbf9f15ee55f5b291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/108131] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Incorrect bound calculation when bound intrinsic used in size expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108131 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.0 Status

[Bug fortran/108131] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Incorrect bound calculation when bound intrinsic used in size expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108131 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Possibly caused by the fix for pr103505 (commit r12-5779).

[Bug fortran/108131] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Incorrect bound calculation when bound intrinsic used in size expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108131 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug fortran/108109] [ICE] gfortran compilation fails calling 'free()' with 'malloc(): mismatching next->prev_size (unsorted)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108109 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/95947] PACK intrinsic returns blank strings when an allocatable character array with allocatable length is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95947 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Setting a breakpoint in gfc_resolve_pack, I find for the len=: case: (gdb) p *array->ts.u.cl $12 = {length = 0x0, next = 0x2cc7af0, length_from_typespec = false, backend_decl =

[Bug fortran/95947] PACK intrinsic returns blank strings when an allocatable character array with allocatable length is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95947 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The dump tree shows near the pack intrinsic: - for character(len=10): atmp.4.dtype = {.elem_len=10, .rank=1, .type=6}; atmp.4.span = 10; atmp.4.data = 0B; atmp.4.offset = 0

[Bug fortran/79426] [10 Regression] fortran - internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79426 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10 Regression] fortran

[Bug fortran/108109] [ICE] gfortran compilation fails calling 'free()' with 'malloc(): mismatching next->prev_size (unsorted)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108109 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Is this attached file to be preprocessed? Or does it need special options? Can't reproduce here.

[Bug fortran/79426] [10/11/12/13 Regression] fortran - internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79426 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC

[Bug fortran/107423] ICE in parse_spec, at fortran/parse.cc:4017

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107423 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/107995] ICE: Segmentation fault, without backtrace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107995 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone

[Bug fortran/107995] ICE: Segmentation fault, without backtrace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107995 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Can we close this one? (Target milestone 13)?

[Bug fortran/102180] Improve checking of assume size array spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102180 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug fortran/102180] Improve checking of assume size array spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102180 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed

[Bug fortran/106911] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.cc:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106911 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone

[Bug fortran/107995] ICE: Segmentation fault, without backtrace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107995 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/106911] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.cc:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106911 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-December/058613.html

[Bug fortran/106911] ICE in gfc_convert_mpz_to_signed, at fortran/simplify.cc:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106911 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/107995] ICE: Segmentation fault, without backtrace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107995 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO since r7-4096-gbf9f15ee55f5b291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO since r7-4096-gbf9f15ee55f5b291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107872 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/108025] Duplicate CONTIGUOUS attribute should be diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108025 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/108025] Duplicate CONTIGUOUS attribute should be diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108025 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-08

[Bug fortran/108025] New: Duplicate CONTIGUOUS attribute should be diagnosed

Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following code should be rejected as indicated: subroutine foo (x) real, contiguous :: x(:) contiguous :: x! { dg-error "Duplicate CONTI

[Bug fortran/107753] gfortran returns NaN in complex divisions (x+x*I)/(x+x*I) and (x+x*I)/(x-x*I)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107753 --- Comment #15 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #14) > Comment #10 contains a simple timing measurement in from my Intel Core2 Duo > based system. gfortran with its current method (ie., -fcx-fortran

[Bug fortran/108010] ICE in reduce_unary, at fortran/arith.cc:1345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108010 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Resolution

[Bug fortran/107874] merge not using all its arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107874 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/107753] gfortran returns NaN in complex divisions (x+x*I)/(x+x*I) and (x+x*I)/(x-x*I)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107753 --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #12) > The optimization level is irrelevant. gfortran unilaterally > uses -fcx-fortran-rules, and there is no way to disable this > option to

[Bug fortran/108010] ICE in reduce_unary, at fortran/arith.cc:1345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108010 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-December/058586.html

[Bug fortran/108010] ICE in reduce_unary, at fortran/arith.cc:1345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108010 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-07 Ever

[Bug fortran/108010] ICE in reduce_unary, at fortran/arith.cc:1345

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108010 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/106856] [12/13 Regression][OOP] CLASS attribute handling / ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:1977 since r12-4346-geb92cd57a1ebe7cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/107441] optional arguments are identified as "present" when missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107441 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug middle-end/107982] New: ICE in in lower_bound, at value-range.h:350

: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 54022 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54022&action=edit Reproducer This appears to be a recent regression. The test

[Bug fortran/107968] array slicing gives wrong result for an array pointer defined in a subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107968 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The following attempt fixes the erroneous output: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc index 9f86815388c..c4525f67ef3 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-io.cc +++ b/gcc

[Bug fortran/107922] ICE in gfc_simplify_unpack, at fortran/simplify.cc:8473

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107922 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone

[Bug fortran/107968] array slicing gives wrong result for an array pointer defined in a subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107968 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-05 Ever

[Bug fortran/107144] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:1623

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107144 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last

[Bug fortran/107899] ICE in resolve_deallocate_expr, at fortran/resolve.cc:7576

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107899 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug fortran/107870] A possible typo in the documentation of 'FLOOR'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107870 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >