[Bug c++/80351] New: Inconsistent warning for constexpr auto constant when using initializer list (-Wunused-variable)

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: arnetheduck at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- In the following snippet, these similar variables give different warnings, when compiled with -Wall - I

[Bug c++/77563] explicit constructor breaks narrowing conversion overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77563 --- Comment #1 from Jacek Sieka --- gcc 5.3.0 gives a different error - looks odd though, no initializer list in sight: /opt/gcc53/bin/g++ -std=gnu++11 explicit.cpp explicit.cpp: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’: explicit.cpp:15:7: error: con

[Bug c++/77563] New: explicit constructor breaks narrowing conversion overload resolution

Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: arnetheduck at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- In the following snippet, an error should be emitted - instead, the compiler prints a warning and keeps compiling, and simply skips

[Bug c++/65923] New: False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: arnetheduck at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- In the following snippet, a warning is given when bringing a chrono literal into the global namespace explicity, but not when

[Bug bootstrap/64593] libmpfr.a undefined reference to `.L222' when doing make profiledbootstrap with bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64593 --- Comment #3 from Jacek Sieka --- I've run a few more tests, and it turns out the culprit is profiledbootstrap. 'make profiledbootstrap' fails even when bootstrap-lto is taken out from the configure line. Plain 'make' works both with and wit

[Bug bootstrap/64593] libmpfr.a undefined reference to `.L222' when doing make profiledbootstrap with bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64593 --- Comment #2 from Jacek Sieka --- Created attachment 34443 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34443&action=edit Build script with configure options

[Bug bootstrap/64593] libmpfr.a undefined reference to `.L222' when doing make profiledbootstrap with bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64593 --- Comment #1 from Jacek Sieka --- *** Bug 64594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/64594] libmpfr.a undefined reference to `.L222' when doing make profiledbootstrap with bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64594 Jacek Sieka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/64594] New: libmpfr.a undefined reference to `.L222' when doing make profiledbootstrap with bootstrap-lto

IRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: arnetheduck at gmail dot com I just tried building gcc-4.9.2 on SciLin6 with bootstrap-lto and profiledbootstrap, with in-tree support libraries, a

[Bug bootstrap/64593] New: libmpfr.a undefined reference to `.L222' when doing make profiledbootstrap with bootstrap-lto

IRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: arnetheduck at gmail dot com Created attachment 34442 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34442&action=edit Full build

[Bug bootstrap/61440] Bootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61440 --- Comment #4 from Jacek Sieka --- This looks very similar to 62077 btw.

[Bug bootstrap/61440] Bootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61440 Jacek Sieka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arnetheduck at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/56135] New: [c++11] this incorrectly captured as null in template member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56135 Bug #: 56135 Summary: [c++11] this incorrectly captured as null in template member function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status:

[Bug c++/53892] New: Invalid "duplicate case value" for C++11 utf-16 char literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53892 Bug #: 53892 Summary: Invalid "duplicate case value" for C++11 utf-16 char literals Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED