[Bug debug/108784] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ --param ira-simple-lra-insn-threshold=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108784 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #2) > Hello, Arseny, > > I have a hunch this could possibly be related with fixed bug 108573. > Is this one by any chance fixed for you? No, I still get this

[Bug tree-optimization/109262] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw in middle of block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109262 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- Sadly, this is likely my final GCC PR, at least for the foreseeable future. I would like to thank all GCC contributors, past and present, for their tireless effort of keeping GCC going. It was a real joy

[Bug tree-optimization/109262] New: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw in middle of block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109262 Bug ID: 109262 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw in middle of block) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/109185] New: ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.cc:2096

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109185 Bug ID: 109185 Summary: ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.cc:2096 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, lto Severity:

[Bug c++/109042] New: [13 Regression] ICE in emit_support_tinfo_1, at cp/rtti.cc:1584

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109042 Bug ID: 109042 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in emit_support_tinfo_1, at cp/rtti.cc:1584 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug ipa/109036] [13 Regression] ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.cc:2096

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109036 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- Created attachment 54592 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54592=edit Testcase part 2/2

[Bug ipa/109036] [13 Regression] ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.cc:2096

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109036 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- Created attachment 54591 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54591=edit Testcase part 1/2

[Bug ipa/109036] New: [13 Regression] ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.cc:2096

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109036 Bug ID: 109036 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.cc:2096 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: lto

[Bug tree-optimization/108979] New: [13 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:248

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108979 Bug ID: 108979 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:248 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/108972] New: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'error_mark' in compare_lambda_template_head, at cp/lambda.cc:1551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108972 Bug ID: 108972 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'error_mark' in compare_lambda_template_head, at cp/lambda.cc:1551

[Bug lto/108971] New: [13 Regression] ICE in tree_profiling, at tree-profile.cc:724

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108971 Bug ID: 108971 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in tree_profiling, at tree-profile.cc:724 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/108970] New: [13 Regression] ICE in vect_do_peeling, at tree-vect-loop-manip.cc:2971, or ICE in dump_printf_loc, at dumpfile.cc:1359

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108970 Bug ID: 108970 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in vect_do_peeling, at tree-vect-loop-manip.cc:2971, or ICE in dump_printf_loc, at dumpfile.cc:1359 Product: gcc

[Bug target/108950] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: conversion of register to a different size in 'view_convert_expr'; error: type mismatch in 'widen_sum_expr')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108950 Bug ID: 108950 Summary: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: conversion of register to a different size in 'view_convert_expr'; error: type mismatch in

[Bug rtl-optimization/108461] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -mcpu=e500mc -O2 -ftrapv -fno-expensive-optimizations -fno-guess-branch-probability -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108461 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- Created attachment 54540 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54540=edit gkd diff #2 I believe this simpler testcase demonstrates the same issue. long long int m, n; void foo (void) {

[Bug debug/108784] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ --param ira-simple-lra-insn-threshold=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108784 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64-linux-gnu |aarch64-linux-gnu,

[Bug tree-optimization/108855] New: [13 Regression] ICE in eliminate_unnecessary_stmts, at tree-ssa-dce.cc:1518

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108855 Bug ID: 108855 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in eliminate_unnecessary_stmts, at tree-ssa-dce.cc:1518 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/108832] New: [13 Regression] ICE in replace_rtx, at rtlanal.cc:3358

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108832 Bug ID: 108832 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in replace_rtx, at rtlanal.cc:3358 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity:

[Bug target/108816] New: ICE in operator[], at vec.h:889

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108816 Bug ID: 108816 Summary: ICE in operator[], at vec.h:889 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug debug/108784] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -O1 -fharden-conditional-branches -funroll-all-loops --param ira-simple-lra-insn-threshold=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108784 Bug ID: 108784 Summary: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -O1 -fharden-conditional-branches -funroll-all-loops --param ira-simple-lra-insn-threshold=1 Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/108783] New: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108783 Bug ID: 108783 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 3) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/108782] New: [13 Regression] ICE in add_phi_arg, at tree-phinodes.cc:359

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108782 Bug ID: 108782 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in add_phi_arg, at tree-phinodes.cc:359 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/106249] [13 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:645 since r13-1450-gd2a898666609452e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106249 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/108706] New: [13 Regression] Indefinite recursion when compiling gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call5.C w/ -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108706 Bug ID: 108706 Summary: [13 Regression] Indefinite recursion when compiling gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call5.C w/ -g Product: gcc Version: 13.0

[Bug ipa/108702] New: [13 Regression] ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.cc:2096

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108702 Bug ID: 108702 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.cc:2096 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: lto

[Bug debug/108656] [12/13 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -O2 -fno-ipa-pure-const -fno-tree-dce --param early-inlining-insns=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108656 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- The snapshot date is of course wrong. It should read "gcc 13.0.1 20230119 snapshot (g:2e32a12c04c72f692a7bd119fd3e4e5b74392c9d)".

[Bug debug/108656] New: [12/13 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -O2 -fno-ipa-pure-const -fno-tree-dce --param early-inlining-insns=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108656 Bug ID: 108656 Summary: [12/13 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -O2 -fno-ipa-pure-const -fno-tree-dce --param early-inlining-insns=0 Product: gcc

[Bug c++/108566] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl with visibility' structure, have 'field_decl' in write_unqualified_name, at cp/mangle.cc:1438

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108566 Bug ID: 108566 Summary: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl with visibility' structure, have 'field_decl' in write_unqualified_name, at

[Bug ipa/108509] New: [13 Regression] ICE in add, at hash-set.h:64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108509 Bug ID: 108509 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in add, at hash-set.h:64 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/108508] New: [13 Regression] ICE in insert_def_after, at rtl-ssa/accesses.cc:622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108508 Bug ID: 108508 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in insert_def_after, at rtl-ssa/accesses.cc:622 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/108461] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -mcpu=e500mc -O2 -ftrapv -fno-expensive-optimizations -fno-guess-branch-probability -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108461 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- Created attachment 54304 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54304=edit gkd diff w/ -m64 Compiling w/ -m64 instead of -m32 yields the attached gkd diff. This PR can be actually a

[Bug rtl-optimization/108461] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -mcpu=e500mc -O2 -ftrapv -fno-expensive-optimizations -fno-guess-branch-probability -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108461 Bug ID: 108461 Summary: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -mcpu=e500mc -O2 -ftrapv -fno-expensive-optimizations -fno-guess-branch-probability -fno-tree-dce

[Bug tree-optimization/108367] New: [12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 4 does not dominate use in block 3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108367 Bug ID: 108367 Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 4 does not dominate use in block 3) Product: gcc Version: 13.0

[Bug target/108272] [13 Regression] ICE in gen_movxo, at config/rs6000/mma.md:339

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108272 --- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #4) > Yes, please file a new one. Thanks again. I've filed PR108348 for that.

[Bug target/108348] New: ICE in gen_movoo, at config/rs6000/mma.md:292

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108348 Bug ID: 108348 Summary: ICE in gen_movoo, at config/rs6000/mma.md:292 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Bug target/108272] [13 Regression] ICE in gen_movxo, at config/rs6000/mma.md:339

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108272 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #2) > Created attachment 54192 [details] > untested patch > > Hi @Arseny, I hope this patch can help to clear all the ICEs about > unexpected uses of MMA opaque types

[Bug lto/108330] New: [13 Regression] ICE in add, at hash-set.h:64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108330 Bug ID: 108330 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in add, at hash-set.h:64 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, lto Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/89098] ICE: verify_ssa failed (Error: definition in block 27 follows the use)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89098 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- While the C testcase in comment 2 is definitely much shorter, current gcc 13 snapshot ICEs on gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63448.c w/ -O1 -fkeep-gc-roots-live --param max-slsr-cand-scan=1.

[Bug target/106736] [13 Regression] ICE in gen_movxo, at config/rs6000/mma.md:333

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106736 --- Comment #16 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #15) > Thanks for reporting, confirmed. The function > rs6000_opaque_type_invalid_use_p only handles gassign, this failure shows > another usage with asm, so we need to

[Bug target/108272] New: [13 Regression] ICE in gen_movxo, at config/rs6000/mma.md:339

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108272 Bug ID: 108272 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in gen_movxo, at config/rs6000/mma.md:339 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/108241] New: [12/13 Regression] ICE in lra_eliminate_regs_1, at lra-eliminations.cc:658

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108241 Bug ID: 108241 Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE in lra_eliminate_regs_1, at lra-eliminations.cc:658 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/106736] [13 Regression] ICE in gen_movxo, at config/rs6000/mma.md:333

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106736 --- Comment #14 from Arseny Solokha --- W/ gcc 13.0.0 20221225 snapshot (g:febb58d28bfa4b544ec7ffec2d61f46d25205ff0) I still get this ICE when compiling gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/mma-builtin-3.c: % powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu-gcc-13 -c

[Bug target/108220] New: ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108220 Bug ID: 108220 Summary: ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/108206] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in merge_default_template_args, at cp/decl.cc:1563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108206 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- > % g++-13 -c vph5xonf.cc > vph5xonf.cc:1:11: error: 'WrongType' has not been declared > 1 | template void foo (T1); > | ^ > vph5xonf.cc:2:11: error: 'WrongType' has not been

[Bug c++/108206] New: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in merge_default_template_args, at cp/decl.cc:1563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108206 Bug ID: 108206 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in merge_default_template_args, at cp/decl.cc:1563

[Bug rtl-optimization/108193] New: [13 Regression] ICE in do_SUBST, at combine.cc:700

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108193 Bug ID: 108193 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in do_SUBST, at combine.cc:700 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug target/106339] [13 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106339 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- Indeed. And I failed to come up w/ an alternative testcase so far.

[Bug target/108174] ICE: tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have ggc_freed in aarch64_resolve_overloaded_memtag, at config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.cc:3349

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108174 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- Created attachment 54127 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54127=edit Preprocessed testcase Though for that to ICE, I have to change an argument to --param ggc-min-expand from 3 to 1.

[Bug target/108174] ICE: tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have ggc_freed in aarch64_resolve_overloaded_memtag, at config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.cc:3349

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108174 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- Created attachment 54124 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54124=edit Full compiler log with Valgrind report

[Bug target/108174] New: ICE: tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have ggc_freed in aarch64_resolve_overloaded_memtag, at config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.cc:3349

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108174 Bug ID: 108174 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have ggc_freed in aarch64_resolve_overloaded_memtag, at

[Bug target/108172] New: [13 Regression] ICE in emit_move_multi_word, at expr.cc:4087

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108172 Bug ID: 108172 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in emit_move_multi_word, at expr.cc:4087 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug analyzer/108171] New: [13 Regression] ICE in binding_key::make, at analyzer/store.cc:132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108171 Bug ID: 108171 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in binding_key::make, at analyzer/store.cc:132 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/105464] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -Og -fharden-compares -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105464 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- Indeed I cannot reproduce it w/ the current gcc 13.0.0 20221211 snapshot.

[Bug analyzer/108065] New: [13 Regression] ICE in make, at analyzer/store.cc:132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108065 Bug ID: 108065 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in make, at analyzer/store.cc:132 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity:

[Bug debug/108061] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -m32 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108061 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- Created attachment 54066 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54066=edit gkd diff #2 The following change yields the attached fiff instead: @ -16,7 +16,7 @@ quux (int x) int bar (int x,

[Bug debug/108061] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -m32 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108061 Bug ID: 108061 Summary: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -m32 -O2 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: compare-debug-failure Severity: normal

[Bug analyzer/108003] New: [13 Regression] ICE in bitmap_check_index, at sbitmap.h:105

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108003 Bug ID: 108003 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in bitmap_check_index, at sbitmap.h:105 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/107985] New: [13 Regression] ICE in as_a, at value-range.h:393

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107985 Bug ID: 107985 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in as_a, at value-range.h:393 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug analyzer/107928] New: ICE in on_bind, at analyzer/sm-fd.cc:1869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107928 Bug ID: 107928 Summary: ICE in on_bind, at analyzer/sm-fd.cc:1869 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/107920] New: [13 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107920 Bug ID: 107920 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2140 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity:

[Bug analyzer/107882] New: [13 Regression] ICE in get_last_bit_offset, at analyzer/store.h:255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107882 Bug ID: 107882 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in get_last_bit_offset, at analyzer/store.h:255 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/107876] New: [13 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.cc:1184 (error: dominator of 4 should be 14, not 16)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107876 Bug ID: 107876 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.cc:1184 (error: dominator of 4 should be 14, not 16) Product: gcc Version: 13.0

[Bug tree-optimization/107865] New: [12/13 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.cc:1748 (Error: loop 3's number of iterations '_61 > 0 ? (uint128_t) (_61 + -1) : 0' references the rele

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107865 Bug ID: 107865 Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.cc:1748 (Error: loop 3's number of iterations '_61 > 0 ? (uint128_t) (_61 + -1) : 0' references

[Bug debug/107832] New: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -fno-gcse-lm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107832 Bug ID: 107832 Summary: '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -fno-gcse-lm Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug testsuite/107830] New: [13 Regression] ICE in gen_aarch64_bitmask_udiv3, at ./insn-opinit.h:813

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107830 Bug ID: 107830 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in gen_aarch64_bitmask_udiv3, at ./insn-opinit.h:813 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug analyzer/107788] New: [13 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.cc:1757

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107788 Bug ID: 107788 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.cc:1757 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug analyzer/107783] New: [13 Regression] ICE in deref_rvalue, at analyzer/region-model.cc:3238

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107783 Bug ID: 107783 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in deref_rvalue, at analyzer/region-model.cc:3238 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug analyzer/107777] New: [13 Regression] ICE in get_representative_path_var_1, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4750

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10 Bug ID: 10 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in get_representative_path_var_1, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4750 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/90134] ICE in duplicate_eh_regions_1, at except.c:557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90134 --- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > This code is all undefined anyways . Yes, but what about unmodified tests from libstdc++? I occasionally hit this ICE on them too, as shown in comment 2.

[Bug tree-optimization/107326] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type mismatch in binary expression) since r13-3219-g25413fdb2ac249

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107326 --- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha --- Yes, this one is fixed. Thanks.

[Bug tree-optimization/107570] New: [13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in instantiate_scev_name/gimple_bb)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107570 Bug ID: 107570 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in instantiate_scev_name/gimple_bb) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/107505] New: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107505 Bug ID: 107505 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/107490] New: [13 Regression] ICE in build_ge, at range-op-float.cc:283

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107490 Bug ID: 107490 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in build_ge, at range-op-float.cc:283 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/90259] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: missing REG_EH_REGION note at the end of bb 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90259 --- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha --- Created attachment 53808 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53808=edit -mdebug=target dump (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #4) > Could you provide one dump file for -mdebug=target?

[Bug analyzer/107486] New: [13 Regression] ICE in deref_rvalue, at analyzer/region-model.cc:3317

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107486 Bug ID: 107486 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in deref_rvalue, at analyzer/region-model.cc:3317 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/107484] New: [13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in decls_match)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107484 Bug ID: 107484 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in decls_match) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug target/107454] New: ICE: Segmentation fault (in single_set)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107454 Bug ID: 107454 Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault (in single_set) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/107447] New: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107447 Bug ID: 107447 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status:

[Bug rtl-optimization/90259] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: missing REG_EH_REGION note at the end of bb 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90259 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- Aha! I've just managed to reproduce it even w/ the current gcc 13 snapshot by adding -fstack-protector-all to the list of command line arguments: % powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu-g++-13 -m32 -O1 -ffloat-store

[Bug tree-optimization/106433] [13 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_loops, at tree-vectorizer.cc:1032

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106433 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- JFTR, I believe I can reproduce the same issue on x86_64 w/ the current gcc 13.0.0 20221023 (g:0e37fd4dc74c1db99cdc7d71ef378e1221253c6f) snapshot: int m; int *p; __attribute__ ((simd)) int bar (int x) {

[Bug tree-optimization/107394] New: [13 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:716

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107394 Bug ID: 107394 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:716 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug other/107353] [13 regression] Numerous ICEs after r13-3416-g1d561e1851c466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353 --- Comment #10 from Arseny Solokha --- g++ 13.0.0 20221023 snapshot (g:0e37fd4dc74c1db99cdc7d71ef378e1221253c6f) ICEs when compiling the following testcase, reduced from test/CodeGenCXX/cxx11-thread-local.cpp from the clang 14 test suite:

[Bug other/107353] [13 regression] Numerous ICEs after r13-3416-g1d561e1851c466

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107353 --- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #6) > Presumably powerpc64le doesn't use emutls, so there might be two issues. I have it on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu…

[Bug tree-optimization/107369] New: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107369 Bug ID: 107369 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/107368] New: [13 Regression] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed (error: non-trivial conversion in 'var_decl')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107368 Bug ID: 107368 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed (error: non-trivial conversion in 'var_decl') Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/106717] [13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have poly_int_cst in get_len, at tree.h:6247

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106717 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- Indeed, this particular case works now.

[Bug target/106959] [13 Regression] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.cc:4168 (error: unable to generate reloads), or ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.cc:7405 since r13-2100-g5cccc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106959 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- Here's a shorter testcase that AFAICT doesn't rely on UB: unsigned __int128 m; int n; __attribute__ ((simd)) void foo (int x) { x = n ? n : (short int) x; if (x) m /= 2; } gcc 13.0.0 20221016

[Bug tree-optimization/107326] New: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type mismatch in binary expression)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107326 Bug ID: 107326 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type mismatch in binary expression) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/88132] Compile time and memory hog w/ var-tracking on 32-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88132 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- I cannot reproduce it anymore w/ gcc 13.0.0 20221016 snapshot (g:6366e3e8847af98d4728d55951534769d034d02a) and w/ gcc 12.2.

[Bug target/97940] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2306 (error: impossible constraint in 'asm'; error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97940 --- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha --- I cannot reproduce it anymore w/ gcc 13.0.0 20221016 snapshot (g:6366e3e8847af98d4728d55951534769d034d02a) and w/ gcc 12.2.

[Bug target/96544] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg_concatn, at lower-subreg.c:717

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96544 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- I cannot reproduce it anymore w/ gcc 13.0.0 20221016 snapshot (g:6366e3e8847af98d4728d55951534769d034d02a) and w/ gcc 12.2.

[Bug target/96448] ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96448 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- I cannot reproduce it anymore w/ gcc 13.0.0 20221016 snapshot (g:6366e3e8847af98d4728d55951534769d034d02a) and w/ gcc 12.2.

[Bug rtl-optimization/90259] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: missing REG_EH_REGION note at the end of bb 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90259 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- I cannot reproduce it anymore w/ gcc 13.0.0 20221016 snapshot (g:6366e3e8847af98d4728d55951534769d034d02a).

[Bug rtl-optimization/88596] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Maximum number of LRA assignment passes is achieved (30)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88596 --- Comment #15 from Arseny Solokha --- In case it's still worth it to track the underlying issue somewhere, does it make sense to open a new PR just for the issue highlighted by Vladimir in comment 8? Otherwise, I suppose this PR can be safely

[Bug tree-optimization/85964] [10/11/12/13 Regression] compile time hog w/ -O3 -ftracer -fno-guess-branch-probability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85964 --- Comment #23 from Arseny Solokha --- I cannot reproduce it anymore w/ gcc 13.0.0 20221016 snapshot (g:6366e3e8847af98d4728d55951534769d034d02a) and w/ gcc 12.2.

[Bug target/99706] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99706 --- Comment #13 from Arseny Solokha --- I cannot reproduce it anymore w/ gcc 13.0.0 20221016 snapshot (g:6366e3e8847af98d4728d55951534769d034d02a) and w/ gcc 12.2, though 11.3 is still affected.

[Bug tree-optimization/107312] New: [13 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:1172, called from range_true_and_false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107312 Bug ID: 107312 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:1172, called from range_true_and_false Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug translation/107301] New: [13 Regression] ICE in duplicate_block, at cfghooks.cc:1114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107301 Bug ID: 107301 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in duplicate_block, at cfghooks.cc:1114 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/107300] New: ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: virtual definition of statement not up to date)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107300 Bug ID: 107300 Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: virtual definition of statement not up to date) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/95569] ICE in tmmark：verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95569 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/105820] [13 Regression] ICE in invert, at value-range.cc:1971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105820 --- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha --- I believe it won't hurt to add a testcase to the test suite.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >