https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94932
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
I cannot reproduce it anymore w/ gcc-11.0.0-alpha20201129 snapshot
(g:bb67ad5cff58a707aaae645d4f45a913d8511c86). gcc 10 and 11 now accept this
code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97575
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
I cannot reproduce it anymore w/ gcc-11.0.0-alpha20201129 snapshot
(g:bb67ad5cff58a707aaae645d4f45a913d8511c86).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96177
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
I cannot reproduce it anymore w/ gcc-11.0.0-alpha20201129 snapshot
(g:bb67ad5cff58a707aaae645d4f45a913d8511c86).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98075
Bug ID: 98075
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed
(error: malloc attribute should be used for a function
that returns a pointer)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98072
Bug ID: 98072
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_omp_var_list_no_open,
at cp/parser.c:34843
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98066
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha ---
Is it a duplicate of PR98065, then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98066
Bug ID: 98066
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gsi_next)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97239
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
I cannot reproduce it anymore w/ gcc-11.0.0-alpha20201129 snapshot
(g:bb67ad5cff58a707aaae645d4f45a913d8511c86).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98065
Bug ID: 98065
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_expand_vector_set, at
config/rs6000/rs6000.c:7024
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98023
Bug ID: 98023
Summary: ICE: free_expr0(): Bad expr type
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98022
Bug ID: 98022
Summary: ICE in gfc_assign_data_value, at fortran/data.c:468
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96791
--- Comment #17 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #16)
> Oh, it's a different testcase, in comment 6. Yeah a new PR would
> have been better ;-/
Do you want me to reopen PR97963 and copy comment 14 there
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97978
Bug ID: 97978
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in lra_assign, at
lra-assigns.c:1648
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96791
--- Comment #13 from Arseny Solokha ---
The testcase in comment 6 still ICEs when compiled w/ -m32:
% powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu-gcc-11.0.0 -m32 -c wqugxu8a.c
wqugxu8a.c: In function 'test0':
wqugxu8a.c:8:1: error: insn does not satisfy its
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96791
--- Comment #12 from Arseny Solokha ---
*** Bug 97963 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97963
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97963
Bug ID: 97963
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached,
at recog.c:2228 (error: insn does not satisfy its
constraints)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97947
Bug ID: 97947
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in digest_init_r, at
cp/typeck2.c:1145
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97870
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97940
Bug ID: 97940
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2306
(error: impossible constraint in 'asm'; error:
unrecognizable insn)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97870
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97577
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
…or, sometimes, it ICEs w/ "internal compiler error: in
linemap_macro_map_lookup, at libcpp/line-map.c:1001".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97881
Bug ID: 97881
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in warn_about_ambiguous_parse, at
cp/parser.c:20800
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97874
Bug ID: 97874
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type
or union_type or qual_union_type, have
template_type_parm in lookup_using_decl, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97871
Bug ID: 97871
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_declaration, at
cp/parser.c:13539
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97870
Bug ID: 97870
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error:
too many outgoing branch edges from bb 2)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97835
Bug ID: 97835
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error:
incorrect type of vector CONSTRUCTOR elements)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97767
Bug ID: 97767
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in extract_range_basic, at
vr-values.c:1445
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97761
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49522|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97762
Bug ID: 97762
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
warn_about_ambiguous_parse)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97761
Bug ID: 97761
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_live_operation, at
tree-vect-loop.c:8689
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97721
Bug ID: 97721
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at
value-range.cc:361
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97668
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
Finally, a C testcase:
void
wb (_Complex double jh)
{
_Complex double af = 0.0;
do
{
af += jh;
}
while (af != 0.0);
}
_Complex double
o6 (void)
{
_Complex double ba = 0.0;
for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97698
Bug ID: 97698
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
duplicate_thunk_for_node)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97684
Bug ID: 97684
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in reg_preferred_class, at
reginfo.c:789
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97673
Bug ID: 97673
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at
tree-inline.c:1922
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97671
Bug ID: 97671
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected var_decl or function_decl or
field_decl or type_decl or concept_decl or
template_decl, have parm_decl in push_template_decl,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97670
Bug ID: 97670
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that
contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'mem_ref' in
finistree check: expected tree that contains 'decl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97668
Bug ID: 97668
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in cmp_cst, at
analyzer/svalue.cc:283
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97472
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
I cannot reproduce it w/ gcc-11.0.0-alpha20201025 snapshot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97609
Bug ID: 97609
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that
contains 'decl common' structure, have 'component_ref'
in tree_could_trap_p, at tree-eh.c:2708
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97597
Bug ID: 97597
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in build_over_call, at
cp/call.c:9034
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97596
Bug ID: 97596
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at
tree.c:1535
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97577
Bug ID: 97577
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
get_location_from_adhoc_loc)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97576
Bug ID: 97576
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error:
reference to dead statement)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97575
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97575
Bug ID: 97575
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in
try_make_edge_direct_simple_call, at ipa-prop.c:3671
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97560
Bug ID: 97560
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that
contains 'decl common' structure, have 'component_ref'
in tree_could_trap_p, at tree-eh.c:2708
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97516
Bug ID: 97516
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class
'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in
useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97515
Bug ID: 97515
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type
mismatch in 'rshift_expr')
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97514
Bug ID: 97514
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in add_function_entry, at
analyzer/engine.cc:1958
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97511
Bug ID: 97511
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in template_parm_to_arg, at
cp/pt.c:4744
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97489
Bug ID: 97489
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
ana::supergraph::get_node_for_function_entry(function*
) const)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97488
Bug ID: 97488
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
wi::set_bit_large)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97487
Bug ID: 97487
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_simple_binop, at
optabs.c:939
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97396
Bug ID: 97396
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
bounds_of_var_in_loop)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97395
Bug ID: 97395
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in update_binding, at
cp/name-lookup.c:2504
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97289
Bug ID: 97289
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in get, at cgraph.h:446
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, openmp
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97241
Bug ID: 97241
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at
tree-vect-loop.c:6503
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97239
Bug ID: 97239
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at
gimple-isel.cc:201
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97235
Bug ID: 97235
Summary: ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:4251
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97233
Bug ID: 97233
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in deref_rvalue, at
analyzer/region-model.cc:1465
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
--- Comment #22 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #21)
> So given that the analyzer doesn't crash on the current Linux kernel code,
> does it do anything useful like find any bugs, perhaps ?
The snapshot I've
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
--- Comment #20 from Arseny Solokha ---
Using gcc-11.0.0-alpha20200927 snapshot I've just managed to build current
Linux master, configured w/ allyesconfig for x86_64, without ICEs, compile-time
hogs, or memory hogs in the analyzer for the first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97133
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
Likely a duplicate of PR97172.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94508
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Confirmed, -fconcepts started with GCC 6. Is it a valid or invalid code?
clang rejects it, but accepts the following one, on which g++ also ICEs:
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97187
Bug ID: 97187
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree_list,
have error_mark in tsubst_copy_and_build, at
cp/pt.c:19782
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97186
Bug ID: 97186
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
maybe_instantiate_noexcept)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
501 - 569 of 569 matches
Mail list logo
