https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85487
--- Comment #5 from Austin Morton ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> The docs raise some questions.
>
> They say that a #pragma region must be ended by a #pragma endregion. Should
> the compiler check that and issue a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170
--- Comment #7 from Austin Morton ---
As I said, the code made no sense to me in the context of C/C++ qualified names
- the comment didn't clarify that this bit of code was concerned with Ada
qualified names.
Printing the fully qualified name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170
--- Comment #5 from Austin Morton ---
Of course, I only provided it to show how I was generating the "expected"
results.
I wasn't sure what the purpose of splitting at "." was (in particular since I
think of GCC as a C/C++ compiler and the "."
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170
--- Comment #1 from Austin Morton ---
Created attachment 47076
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47076=edit
current su output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170
--- Comment #2 from Austin Morton ---
Created attachment 47077
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47077=edit
expected su output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92170
--- Comment #3 from Austin Morton ---
Created attachment 47078
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47078=edit
workaround patch
Priority: P3
Component: driver
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: austinpmorton at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47075
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47075=edit
example source
When test.cc is compi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85593
--- Comment #9 from Austin Morton ---
Apologies for letting this sit so long.
I spent an afternoon digging through some of the mentioned functions trying to
familiarize myself with everything but I didn't make it further than that.
That was a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85593
--- Comment #7 from Austin Morton ---
I will certainly give writing a patch a try - but I will disclaim up front that
because there is a viable workaround for the issue I was having (patch below
[1]), this issue is "resolved" as far as my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85593
--- Comment #4 from Austin Morton ---
In my particular case I was able to work around the issue by removing the naked
attribute and using extended assembly with a clobbers list.
The resulting code is nearly identical (allowing GCC to generate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85593
--- Comment #2 from Austin Morton ---
Where is this limitation documented? The GCC documentation on the naked
function attribute makes no mention of such a caveat:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/ARM-Function-Attributes.html
See here for
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: austinpmorton at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 44048
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44048=e
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: austinpmorton at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
#pragma region is a feature introduced by Microsoft in order to allow manual
grouping and folding
13 matches
Mail list logo
