[Bug tree-optimization/40921] New: missed optimization: x + (-y * z * z) = x - y * z * z

* z Product: gcc Version: 4.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: benoit dot hudson at gmail dot com http

[Bug tree-optimization/40921] missed optimization: x + (-y * z * z) = x - y * z * z

--- Comment #2 from benoit dot hudson at gmail dot com 2009-07-30 23:58 --- Note that -frounding-math should disable the proposed optimization. Ah, true; and that means that with the options I said to use, the optimization is simply wrong. However, I see the same behaviour even

[Bug c/37361] New: spurious 'uninitialized' warning

-- Summary: spurious 'uninitialized' warning Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: benoit dot hudson

[Bug bootstrap/34818] New: --with-gmp overrides --with-mpfr

Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: benoit dot hudson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34818

[Bug c++/34015] warning in backward_warning.h is illegible

--- Comment #5 from benoit dot hudson at gmail dot com 2007-11-08 15:35 --- The fact that the error appears in backward_warning.h is another annoyance, which is probably why the overly long descriptive message is there. Better would be that #include ext/hash_set would only report ext

[Bug c++/34015] New: warning in backward_warning.h is illegible

Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: benoit dot hudson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34015

[Bug c++/33902] New: alias warning returning typeid(void)

Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: benoit dot hudson at gmail dot com GCC target triplet: i386-apple-darwin8.10.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33902

[Bug c++/33902] alias warning returning typeid(void)

--- Comment #1 from benoit dot hudson at gmail dot com 2007-10-26 02:50 --- Perhaps I should mention the type in the typeid is irrelevant to whether this bug shows up, so it's not something funky about void. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33902

[Bug driver/33851] New: gcc-4.3 mishandles -compatibility_version on OS X

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: benoit dot hudson at gmail dot com GCC target triplet: i386-apple-darwin8.10.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33851

[Bug driver/33851] gcc-4.3 mishandles -compatibility_version on OS X

--- Comment #1 from benoit dot hudson at gmail dot com 2007-10-21 15:15 --- I should specify: I can *compile* but I can't *link*. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33851

[Bug driver/33851] gcc-4.3 mishandles -compatibility_version on OS X

--- Comment #3 from benoit dot hudson at gmail dot com 2007-10-21 18:23 --- (In reply to comment #2) Well, libtool needs to check the gcc version. I fully understand that morally, it's libtool's fault for releasing a program that didn't correctly divine that gcc 4.3 would change

[Bug c++/30754] New: mystefying error type A is not derived from type B

A is not derived from type B Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: benoit dot hudson at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/23679] New: c++ is used uninitialized warning on arrays hard to read

: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: benoit dot hudson at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23679

[Bug c++/14329] [tree-ssa] badly formatted warnings for SRA replacements

--- Additional Comments From benoit dot hudson at gmail dot com 2005-09-01 16:14 --- With this number of duplicates, perhaps it's time to change the title to contain used uninitialized so searchers are more likely to find it? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14329