https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11
--- Comment #4 from Donald Buczek ---
Great, thank you!
I wonder, if the related missed optimization opportunity should also be
reported.
#include
int f(void) {
char **vec = calloc(1, sizeof(char *));
if (vec) {
// *vec =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11
Bug ID: 11
Summary: analyzer: False positives with calloc()
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113329
Bug ID: 113329
Summary: analyzer: False positive analyzer-fd-use-without-check
with dup2()
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109839
Donald Buczek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||buczek at molgen dot mpg.de
---
