[Bug libfortran/94625] New: documentation of _gfortran_set_options does not match implementation

2020-04-16 Thread cgw at alum dot mit.edu
Priority: P3 Component: libfortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cgw at alum dot mit.edu Target Milestone: --- In gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi the documentation for _libgfortran_set_options describes the OPTIONS argument as follows

[Bug libfortran/35014] Libgfortran.a (downloaded) is not PIC compiled...

2017-12-23 Thread cgw at alum dot mit.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35014 --- Comment #7 from cgw at alum dot mit.edu --- Thanks for the suggestion. I will give it a try. However, we're using a gcc from the distribution - either Ubuntu or Anaconda, depending on the platform. We are not configuring and building our

[Bug libfortran/35014] Libgfortran.a (downloaded) is not PIC compiled...

2017-12-11 Thread cgw at alum dot mit.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35014 --- Comment #5 from cgw at alum dot mit.edu --- Why not? Our use case is building a Python module (an .so file loaded by Python) which wraps some Fortran code. We would like to reduce the external dependencies that this module has. There have

[Bug fortran/83340] New: Libgfortran.a (downloaded) is not PIC compiled...

2017-12-08 Thread cgw at alum dot mit.edu
Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cgw at alum dot mit.edu Target Milestone: --- Trying to build a Python extension with -static-libgcc fails with /usr/bin/ld: /lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.1.0/../../../../lib64/libgfortran.a(compile_options.o