--- Comment #32 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-09-30
13:47 ---
I'm not sure how (or why) but... I checked out gcc trunk rev. 152325, and the
problems seems to have gone away (at least for now).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41357
--- Comment #30 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-09-24
11:10 ---
Not sure about the status here... but, on this system:
Windows XP Pro/SP3 cygwin Intel Core2 Duo t9...@2.80ghz system with packages:
binutils 2.19.51-1 2.19.51.20090704
bison
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
http
--- Comment #18 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-07-05
17:24 ---
As Dave suggests in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455#c13, this
is fixed,
--
christian dot joensson at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-07-01
07:02 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Might be safer to rename to GNAT_FOPEN or something like that? FOPEN is likely
to be taken on more than one platform.
Which line are you suggesting I test change? I initially
in ada/adaint.h:58
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
GCC
--- Comment #11 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-24
13:03 ---
I have tried binutils cvs checkouts as of
20090608 12:00 UTC
20090519 12:00 UTC
20090502 12:00 UTC
20090402 12:00 UTC
20090309 12:00 UTC
as well as cygwin's provided binutils 2.18.50.20080625, all
--- Comment #10 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-24
05:56 ---
Backing out gcc commit r148408 from gcc trunk , using binutils 2.19.51.20090623
cvs checkout (03:52:32 UTC 2009), for r148850, gets bootstrap to complete.
Testresults posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
--- Comment #7 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-22
08:29 ---
still there as of revision 148777. The bootstrap failure occurs also when
configuring like this:
../gcc/configure --enable-threads=posix --enable-libgcj
--disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-system-zlib
--- Comment #8 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-22
17:22 ---
Might be related to http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-06/msg00370.html ...
If I strip the here attached a.exe, I get a file that indeed runs...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #9 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-22
17:37 ---
The PR was reported using a local build of binutils' daily snapshot of
20090609, and all comments from me was using that version of binutils.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
as of commit r148492
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
GCC build
--
christian dot joensson at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40456
--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16
12:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=18006)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18006action=view)
a.c: from conftest in intl
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #3 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16
12:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=18007)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18007action=view)
a.exe generated
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16
12:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=18008)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18008action=view)
a.i: generated with --save-temps
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #5 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16
12:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=18009)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18009action=view)
a.s: generated with --save-temps
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #6 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16
12:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=18010)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18010action=view)
a.o: generated with --save-temps
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16
12:35 ---
Fixed, as far as I understand, with commit r148523,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-06/msg00503.html.
--
christian dot joensson at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
not bootstrap as of commit r148408
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail
--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-05-13
10:24 ---
what is the current situation concerning gnatlib? is that passed explicitly
from stage to stage?
--
christian dot joensson at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-05-13
10:25 ---
sorry, I meant gnatbind instead of gnatlib...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37109
--- Comment #6 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2008-09-08
05:30 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/DFcmp.c SFset.c: internal compiler
error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077
I've seen these in 4.3-based toolchains, but don't see them with recent trunk.
Do
--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2008-01-17
11:23 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
For example http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00724.html may
confirm that the problem exists and that it is on --host=--target=--build=
sparc*-*-linux-gnu. I have
--- Comment #1 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2008-01-17
11:19 ---
For example http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00724.html may
confirm that the problem exists and that it is on --host=--target=--build=
sparc*-*-linux-gnu. I have asked the poster if he
--- Comment #3 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2008-01-17
11:26 ---
This happens still on trunk. See
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00745.html.
A look into the testsuite log file of the gcc tests shows this:
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk
at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: sparc64-unknown-linu-gnu
GCC host triplet: sparc64-unknown-linu-gnu
GCC target triplet: sparc64-unknown-linu-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
, at recog.c:2077
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet
--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2007-03-21
08:37 ---
same thing on 4.2 RC1:
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/branch/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++
-B/\
usr/local/src/branch/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../ -nostdinc++
-I/usr/local/\
src/branch/objdir
--- Comment #1 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2007-03-09
07:36 ---
One the same computer system, this also happens on trunk, ie. 4.3.0...
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Mar 7 11:15:23 UTC 2007 (revision 122655)
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g
: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31070
--- Comment #24 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2007-02-20
13:10 ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Patch in the works.
any progress?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
--- Comment #33 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2007-02-20
13:11 ---
(In reply to comment #32)
Created an attachment (id=10984)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10984action=view) [edit]
Reduced testcase.
any news?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #26 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-12-15
09:03 ---
I would just like to say that I see this on sparc64-linux too on the 4.2
branch.
Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.90 (Aurora Corona)/TI UltraSparc IIi (Sabre)
sun4u:
binutils-2.17.50.0.3-6.sparc.sparc
bison
--- Comment #9 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-11-28
09:17 ---
ping
any news on this one?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28870
--- Comment #46 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-11-10
09:08 ---
(In reply to comment #45)
Created an attachment (id=12575)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12575action=view) [edit]
Linker fix for !HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP breakage
Successfully tested
--- Comment #12 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-08-28
08:12 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Fixed on the mainline, will apply to the branches after a week or so.
So, how's this going for 4.1?
--
christian dot joensson at gmail dot com changed:
What
dot joensson at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: sparc64-*
GCC host triplet: sparc64-*
GCC target triplet: sparc64-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28143
--- Comment #17 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-06-04
08:27 ---
just a ping here, is anyone here able to say anything about status of this bug?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26797
--- Comment #1 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-05-06
10:30 ---
hmm, must be the EXEEXT thing
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27376
--- Comment #5 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-05-06
10:58 ---
There may be connections with this PR to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20035
especially the http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8217 which I would
suggest be named sparc64 instead
--- Comment #26 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-05-06
11:30 ---
For sparc/sparc64 linux, the status for 4.2 20060503, from here,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-05/msg00223.html, is this:
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix/-m64
--- Comment #3 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-05-06
12:07 ---
what's the status of this one?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16513
--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-05-06
12:08 ---
what's the status of this one?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17347
--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-04-24
09:26 ---
I understand that this might be affecting SPARC/Linux too, cf.,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-04/msg00448.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25865
--- Comment #8 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-12-17
12:19 ---
I suppose this is what I experience too on sparc/sparc64 linux, see also
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-12/msg00491.html
I get this on trunk Sat Dec 17 00:14:08 UTC 2005 (revision 108698):
../../xgcc -B
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438
--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-12-01
10:06 ---
Not 100% sure, but I do believe this has happend on sparc/sparc64 linux for a
quite some time...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25176
--- Comment #6 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-11-16
12:18 ---
I may be getting this still for sparc/sparc64 linux, see, e.g., for 4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-11/msg00778.html and for 4.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-11/msg00759.html
--- Comment #7 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-11-16
12:21 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-11/msg00778.html and for 4.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-11/msg00759.html
sorry, that should have been 4.1 and not 4.2
--- Comment #8 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-11-04
11:24 ---
Just a ping here... are there any progress on this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20753
--- Comment #8 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-22
11:49 ---
oops, sorry, present on sparc/sparc64 linux too, see, e.g,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-10/msg00927.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21554
--- Comment #9 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-22
11:50 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
oops, sorry, present on sparc/sparc64 linux too, see, e.g,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-10/msg00927.html
hmm, make that sparc64
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-09
20:59 ---
Also here... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00198.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23610
--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-09
21:00 ---
Also here... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00198.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23613
--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-09
21:00 ---
Also here... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00198.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23614
--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-09
21:00 ---
Also here... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00198.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23616
--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-09
21:00 ---
Also here... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00198.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23716
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-09-29 11:54 ---
I'm testing Kenner's suggestion from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-09/msg00867.html ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24053
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian dot joensson at
||gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-09-17 12:08 ---
well, LAST_UPDATED: Fri Sep 16 15:58:15 UTC 2005, and on
xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian dot joensson at
||gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-09-16 18:48 ---
on 4.0 branch, this passed Aug 13,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00840.html,
but failed Sept. 2,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00140.html.
checking further
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-13 07:41 ---
So, this is what it looks like now:
Test Run By chj on Sat Aug 13 09:36:47 2005
Native configuration is sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== treelang tests ===
Schedule of variations
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-10 07:47 ---
well, simply applying this to the 4.0 branch did the trick (together with 20604
applied), I get this:
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Aug 10 05:32:31 UTC 2005 with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-09 19:03 ---
well, applied to 4.0, works fine, one FAIL in -m64:
=== treelang tests ===
Running target unix/-m64
FAIL: gcc 01 01 rc!=0
=== treelang Summary for unix/-m64
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-08 17:18 ---
bugger, it didn't work for the 4.0 branch...
this is from the build log file does the patch look correctly applied to
you?
(SHLIB_LINK=' ./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/local/sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-08 17:53 ---
well... the patch applies cleanly still on the 4.0 branch... I sure would love
to see this applied there also...
unfortunately, I see it does not apply to the 3.4 branch...
--
What
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-06 07:38 ---
or maybe even a bug with my glibc sorry for the noise...
Current directory is /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/gcc/
GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-0.29rh)
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-06 13:19 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Subject: Bug 20673
should we change the target milestone to 3.4.5 for this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20673
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-07 04:34 ---
well, applied it to mainline, no problema caused...
however, the bug was reported for the 4.0 branch... applying there Hunk #1
succeeded at 114 with fuzz 1. will test later today, resources bound
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-07 05:14 ---
I haven't tried this yet... but, could you port back to 4.0 also?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23072
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-07 05:19 ---
oh... and the 3.4 branch too?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23072
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-05 12:21 ---
Phython, Do you have any idea of this?
--
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-05 12:23 ---
BTW, this happens on mainline, 4.0 branch, and also 3.4 branch, see, e.g.,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00196.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23072
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-05 15:01 ---
hmm, a recent run on i686-linux givs me this:
PASS: treelang/execute/static.tree execution test
testcase /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/testsuite/treelang/execute/execute.exp
co\mpleted in 1 seconds
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-08-04 09:46 ---
(In reply to comment #24)
Also fixed in 3.4.5.
This is the currently, 2005-08-03, latest test results I have for 3.4:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00196.html
and the gcc PCH
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian dot joensson at
||gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian dot joensson at
||gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian dot joensson at
||gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-07-31 18:28 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
$(DRIVER_DEFINES) needs to be added to when compiling spec.c.
Would that be done in gcc/Makefile.in or does such a thing belong to
gcc/treelang/Make-lang.in
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-07-31 18:48 ---
uhm... well, what needs to be added to what then in treelang/Make-lang.in?
btw, the 4.0 branch's variant does not differ that much from trunk... there's a
toplev.h difference... and a gcc version
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-07-27 12:25 ---
Same problem on the 3.4 branch...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23072
at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: treelang
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs
for
before created
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: tromey at redhat dot com
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian dot joensson at
||gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian dot joensson at
||gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
CC: ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu
dot org
GCC build triplet: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
http
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-04-14 04:10 ---
hmm... this was probably a false alarm... sorry for any trouble...
A fresh build from the 4.0 branch, LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 13 19:45:52 UTC 2005,
is a checking right now...
--
What
Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
binutils-2.15.92.0.2-5.sparc
bison-1.875c-2.sparc
dejagnu-1.4.4-2.noarch
expect-5.42.1-1.sparc
gcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
gcc4-4.0.0-0.8sparc.sparc
glibc-2.3.3-99.sparc64
glibc-2.3.3-99.sparcv9
glibc-devel-2.3.3-99.sparc
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|C PCH assembly comparison |C PCH testsuite assembly
|failure |comparison failure
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-03-29 07:49 ---
This also happens on 4.0 branch, see testreport at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-03/msg01946.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20673
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-03-19 15:18 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] branch]$ /usr/local/src/branch/objdir32/gcc/xgcc -v
-save-temps -B/usr/local/src/branch/objdir32/gcc/ -O1 -w -c -o
2009-2.o /usr/local/src/branch/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-03-19 15:20 ---
This also happens on mainline, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-03/msg01267.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20553
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian dot joensson at
||gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-03-19 15:37 ---
I guess this is related to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20553
and http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20554
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-03-06 12:30 ---
Laurent Guerby suggested I use this in the gcc/ada/Makefile.in:
ifeq ($(strip $(filter-out sparc% linux%,$(arch) $(osys))),)
LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS = \
a-intnam.adsa-intnam-linux.ads \
s
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
