: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
libstdc++.a: could not read symbols: Bad value
gcc 4.8.2
foo.cc=
#include iostream
void foo() { std::cout 42 std::endl; }
g++ -pthread -fPIC -o foo.so -shared foo.cc
[root@hpblade01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59380
littlestar cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59380
--- Comment #2 from littlestar cnstar9988 at gmail dot com ---
similar to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48172
littlestar cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cnstar9988
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43930
--- Comment #14 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2009-06-15 10:10 ---
ping 4.3.4...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40087
--- Comment #13 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2009-06-16 03:54 ---
ping 4.3.4...
--
cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #14 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2009-06-16 03:56 ---
ping 4.3.4...
The PR40087 fix depends on changes from the this fix, thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39455
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2009-03-02 01:28 ---
ping 4.3.4
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39240
--- Comment #7 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2009-02-03 08:43 ---
4.3.3 on Linux has the same problem.
Target Milestone: 4.3.3?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35923
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2009-02-02 13:19 ---
ping 4.3.4, thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38957
--- Comment #11 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2009-01-08 09:24 ---
fixed for 4.3.3?
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37194
--- Comment #12 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2009-01-08 09:30 ---
Target Milestone: 4.3.3
But not fixed for 4.3.3
ping ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38584
--- Comment #10 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2009-01-07 08:55 ---
ping for 4.3...
--
cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #24 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-12-22 05:57 ---
ping...
4.3.3
--
cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #32 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-11-22 06:03 ---
ping 4.3.3?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27880
--- Comment #7 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-11-20 00:58 ---
ping...
4.3.3?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37263
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-10-30 06:57 ---
fixed in gcc 4.3 branch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37879
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-10-17 07:30 ---
4.3 branch has the same bug...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37805
--- Comment #8 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-10-10 07:28 ---
Target Milestone 4.3.3?
But this patch didn't committed to 4.3 branch.
why closed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36690
--- Comment #23 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-10-09 07:16 ---
to Rainer Orth.
when apply your patch on gcc 4.3.2 release, cause PR3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
--- Comment #3 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-10-09 11:25 ---
sorry, closed.
--
cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #24 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-10-09 11:00 ---
works ok on gcc 4.3.2
--- config.gcc.4.3.2.oldThu Oct 9 18:51:26 2008
+++ config.gcc.4.3.2.newThu Oct 9 18:51:26 2008
@@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@
*-*-solaris2.1[0-9]*)
tm_file=${tm_file
--- Comment #27 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-10-10 00:42 ---
works well on gcc 4.3.2 + patch.
I don't build libgcc_s.so.
gas 2.18 + gmp 4.2.4 + mpfr 2.3.2.
Configured with: ../src/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.3.2
--with-gmp=/opt/gcc-4.3.2 --with-mpfr=/opt/gcc-4.3.2
--- Comment #21 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-10-10 00:56 ---
Does this patch works well on 4.3?
Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37102
: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Comment #2 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-10-09 02:14 ---
yes, I changed config.gcc, to workaround PR33100.
I want to build gcc 4.3.2 on solaris 10.
Index: gcc/config.gcc
===
--- gcc/config.gcc (revision
--- Comment #20 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-09-27 11:32 ---
ping...
The bug is not fixed in 4.3-branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37102
--- Comment #2 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-09-01 10:15 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Do you mean *hangs* during bootstrap?? Sorry, but it's not at all clear what
is
happening exactly on your side.
David, can you follow a bit this... ?
the bootrap stop at ./conftest
--- Comment #3 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-09-01 10:23 ---
$ oslevel -r
5100-09
with all latest AIX 5.1 patch.
=
I can compile gcc 4.2.4, works ok, and used for bootstrap gcc.
gcc 4.2.4 can't support TLS __thread, test.c:1: error: thread-local
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-09-01 10:34 ---
gcc 4.2.4 doesn't support tls on AIX 5.1.
Does gcc 4.3.2 support tls on AIX 5.1? Maybe stage3 gcc can compile __thread,
but can't run well?
why I configure with --disable-tls, gcc 4.3.2 always use and check tls?
IBM
--- Comment #8 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-09-01 11:24 ---
When I remove TLS check code in libstdc++-v3/configure, bootstrap OK!!!
Does there have anything harm when remove the TLS check code? affect only C++?
Thanks
++.a
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: powerpc-ibm-aix5.1.0.0
http
--- Comment #4 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-08-26 13:38 ---
gcc 4.3.2 20080826 failed.
#include stdio.h
unsigned int g_24;
unsigned int g_37 = 1;
unsigned char g_225;
int main (void)
{
int l_289;
for (l_289 = 1; l_289 5; l_289 += 1
--- Comment #6 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-08-22 09:28 ---
sorry, I use 64bit linux for testing.
I tested again.
works well on all 64bit 4.2.4, 4.3.0, 4.3.2-RC1.
works well on 4.2.4 32bit.
works failed on gcc 4.3.0 32bit.
wokrs failed on gcc 4.3.2 RC1 32bit.
--
http
--- Comment #10 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-08-21 12:53 ---
I am sorry for wrong test for 4.3.0.
=
I rebuild my gcc 4.3.0 on 2.6.9-42.7AXsmp with gmp 4.2.3 + mpfr 2.3.1.
And make a test again. It works fail.
But the following
--- Comment #4 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-08-22 00:31 ---
works well on 4.2.4, 4.3.0, 4.3.2-RC1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37125
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-08-21 01:21 ---
ping.
I can reproduce with gcc 4.3.2 RC1.
It work well on gcc 4.2.4, 4.3.0.
gcc -O2 -Wall -c bug.c
-
void xxx()
{
unsigned i;
unsigned*p=0;
for(i=0;i4;++i)
{
*p++=0
--- Comment #9 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-08-17 06:22 ---
ping...
fixed for 4_3 branch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37101
--- Comment #25 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-08-06 06:57 ---
ping...
Can this be fixed before 4.3.2? thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29256
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-08-04 12:42 ---
ping...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36691
--- Comment #7 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-08-04 13:12 ---
confirmed gcc 4.2.4, -O3.
gcc test.c -O3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36691
--- Comment #19 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-07-18 03:37 ---
ping...
gcc 4.2.3 works well, gcc 4.2.4/4.3.0/4.3.1 works failed.
i386-pc-solaris2.10
gas 2.18 + sun ld
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
--- Comment #9 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-07-16 14:24 ---
Target Milestone is 4.3.3?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36546
--- Comment #7 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-07-16 14:24 ---
Target Milestone is 4.3.3?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36657
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-06-26 06:51 ---
ping...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36373
--- Comment #15 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-06-10 10:07 ---
I build gcc 4.3.1 with --with-cld
./src/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.3.1 --with-gmp=/opt/gcc-4.3.1/gmp
--with-mpfr=/opt/gcc-4.3.1/mpfr --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-nls
--enable-bootstrap --disable-shared
--- Comment #11 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-06-07 04:04 ---
Ping...
I have attached config.log for a few days.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36330
--- Comment #7 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-29 01:48 ---
PR33100
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100
gcc-4.3.1-RC-20080523.tar.bz2
binutils 2.18
Solaris 10 x86_64 U4
gcc is configured to use GNU as but Sun ld.
works well on 4.2.3.
but failed on 4.3.1.
Now I
--- Comment #15 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-29 02:30 ---
i386-pc-solaris2.10 has the same problem.
--
cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-29 04:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=15697)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15697action=view)
config.log
config.log
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36330
--- Comment #9 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-29 04:51 ---
configure:2540: checking for C compiler default output file name
configure:2543: /export/home/test/gcc-4.3.1-build/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/export/home/test/gcc-4.3.1-build/build/./gcc/
-B/opt/gcc-4.3.1/i386-pc-solaris2.10
--- Comment #10 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-29 04:56 ---
google crtend.o: section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset
You will find a lot of comments about the question.
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=54665tstart=0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
ReportedBy: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36330
--- Comment #1 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-26 00:43 ---
gmp 4.2.2, mpfr 2.3.1
Both gmp and mpfr build with --disable-shared ABI=32
gcc 4.3.1 configure:
../src/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.3.1 --with-gmp=/opt/gcc-4.3.1/gmp
--with-mpfr=/opt/gcc-4.3.1/mpfr --with-as=/usr
--- Comment #3 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-26 00:54 ---
I want both build my programs -m32 -m64
My OS is solaris 10 x86_64.
I can run well with gcc 4.2.3.
If I build gcc 4.3.1 with --disable-multilib, I can only compile with apps with
-m32?
--
cnstar9988 at gmail dot
--- Comment #4 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-26 02:14 ---
gcc 4.3.1 can build with --disable-multilib on i386-pc-solaris2.10.
It can only compiles 32bit apps.
gcc 4.3.1 can build on sparc-sun-solaris2.10.
It can compiles 32bit and 64bit apps
--- Comment #12 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-22 02:41 ---
I have read the discussions on gcc-patches.
The patchs:
--enable-cld used default on x86 and x86_64.
If build gcc 4.3.1 using --enable-cld:
when use -m32, gcc use -mcld default.
when use -m64, gcc
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-20 07:08 ---
ISVs usually build with compilers from the stone-age to be able to run their
applications on all still supported OS versions.
I agree!
--
which Linux Kernel version has the bug
--- Comment #6 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-20 08:48 ---
How to reopen bug 36079? Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36079
--- Comment #8 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-20 15:17 ---
if configure gcc 4.3.1 with --enable-cld on Redhat AS 3.0 U2.
The programs build with gcc 4.3.1 run well on all Redhat AS 3.0/4.0/5.0, SUSE
9/10 or other Linux OS versions, is it right?
If no --enable-cld with gcc
--- Comment #9 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-20 15:23 ---
GCC 4.2.4 works well on Rehat AS 3.0 U2.
How can I use gcc 4.3.1 instead of gcc 4.2.X?
I want to build my programs on Rehat AS 3.0 U2 with newer gcc, 4.2.4 or 4.3.1.
At the same time, I want the compiled programs run
--- Comment #30 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-09 05:36 ---
fixed?
--
cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #11 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-05-02 09:14 ---
I think it is a duplicate of PR 35169.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27794
--- Comment #2 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-04-29 13:36 ---
This PR 36079 can't appear on buglist.
target_milestone=4.3.1
short_desc=4.3
?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36079
--- Comment #8 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-04-17 06:55 ---
gcc 4.2.2 hp ia64 11.23
Possible causes: insufficient memory or swap space,
or stack size exceeded maxssiz.
make[4]: *** [libgcc/hpux64/__divxf3.o] Segmentation fault (core dumped)
make[4]: Leaving directory `/os
--- Comment #9 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-04-17 07:18 ---
gcc 4.2.2 hp ia64 11.23
build failed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27794
--- Comment #6 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-04-17 15:09 ---
same as PR27794?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27794
confirmed, gcc 4.2.2 hp ia64 11.23
Possible causes: insufficient memory or swap space,
or stack size exceeded maxssiz.
make[4]: *** [libgcc/hpux64
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35928
--- Comment #2 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-04-14 03:49 ---
but how to applies to the pointer type and the element
the pointer is pointing to.
I don't want someone modify my pointer and the pointing to?
but the following code has no warning, why?
#include stdio.h
#include
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-03-11 03:25 ---
when into 4.2.4?
gcc-4_2-branch
Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33289
--- Comment #3 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-02-21 10:26 ---
confirmed.
Checked out revision 132515
gcc version 4.3.0 20080221 (prerelease) (GCC)
gcc -O1 -m32 test.c
aborted.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35264
--- Comment #2 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-02-21 06:07 ---
ok?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35264
--- Comment #2 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-01-22 06:01 ---
Confirmed gcc 4.2.2.
test.cc
=
const int i __attribute((vector_size(8))) = {};
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
return 0
--- Comment #9 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-10-15 00:43 ---
$ cat /usr/bin/gcc
#!/bin/sh
mode=ilp32
first=yes
for arg in $@; do
case $arg in
-milp32|-m32)
mode=ilp32
;;
-mlp64|-m64)
mode=lp64
--- Comment #19 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-10-12 09:56 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Created an attachment (id=13090)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13090action=view) [edit]
A short java file, known to compile under jikes and NetBeans 5.5
Simple test
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33557
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33323
--- Comment #1 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-09-06 13:30 ---
./configure --disable-shared
Because I don't want to dynamic linked with libstdc++.so.
I wan't static linked with libstdc++.a.
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33323
--- Comment #7 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-09-07 05:58 ---
gcc 4.2.1 have the bug too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28811
--- Comment #11 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-26 08:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=13981)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13981action=view)
(64bit)gcc -m32 -O3 -Wall test.c -save-temps
(64bit)gcc -m32 -O3 -Wall test.c -save-temps
In this platform, it's
--- Comment #12 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-26 08:20 ---
I want the warning.
but why the warning is glibc's bug?
because memset(x,19,0), is buggy code.
I need the warning.
--
cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-26 07:45 ---
test.c:14: warning: statement with no effect
So I think it is gcc warning
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32887
--- Comment #9 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-26 08:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=13980)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13980action=view)
file
gcc -m32 -O3 -Wall test.c -save-temps
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32887
--- Comment #4 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-25 09:13 ---
I download GCC from ftp.gnu.org, 4.2.1 release.
gcc -O3 -Wall test.c
can gernerate warning on gcc-4.2.1 on x86
but no warning on gcc-4.2.1/x64. even -m32 or -m64.
I only think the behavior on both platform
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-26 02:29 ---
Why the behavior on both platform is not the same?
same code, same release of GCC.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32887
: memset warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #2 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-25 02:49 ---
why gcc show warnings on x86.
not show warnings on x64?
Bug?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32887
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-23 06:08 ---
I found the problem.
But I don't know how to resolved.
$ gcc -Wl,+noallowunsats -m64 -fPIC -static-libgcc -Wl,-chpexport.sym -shared
-o libtrsbean.sl MafBean.o Function.o api/lib/trsapi.a -lc -lpthread
ld: Unsatisfied
--- Comment #6 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-23 06:22 ---
Similar to this patch.
How to resolved?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00327.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32830
--- Comment #7 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-23 07:15 ---
I build with -lgcc_stub, So works ok.
I think _Jv_RegisterClasses for GCJ.
__cxa_finalize for G++.
My Library only use C language, so works ok.
:)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32830
--- Comment #4 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-20 07:31 ---
On HPPA64, there are some warning.
/home/beans/gcc-build/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/beans/gcc-build/build/./gcc/
-B/opt/gcc-4.2.1/lp64/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/bin/
-B/opt/gcc-4.2.1/lp64/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/lib/ -isystem
--- Comment #4 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-19 07:03 ---
When I build gcc-4.2.1(prelease) on HPUX11.11, there is some warning..
why the share library build by GCC4.X on HPUX11.11 can't work..
some symbol required by the shared library could not be found.
But these works
--- Comment #5 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-19 07:05 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
It's known that -O2 contain -fstrict-aliasing which has bugs since gcc
3.X.
Huh?
from 4.2.1 status report.
PR 32182 -fstrict-aliasing ...
PR 32327 Incorrect stack sharing...
PR 32328
--- Comment #19 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-19 07:17 ---
I have Modify $(GCC)/Makefile.in
LDFLAGS=-lpthread
BOOT_LDFLAGS=-lpthread
So build ok.
--
cnstar9988 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
GCC host triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32831
--- Comment #1 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-20 02:27 ---
insn-conditions.md tmp-recog.c
../../gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/config/i386/i386.md:18885: warning: operand 1 missing
mode?
../../gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/config/i386/i386.md:18928: warning: operand 1 missing
mode?
/bin/sh
--- Comment #2 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-20 05:25 ---
My library is a java native library.
It's was build by hp cc.
I have patch all as/ld patchs from hp site.
I read http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#hppa-hp-hpux11.
It's no doubt that I can build gcc myself.
I
--- Comment #3 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2007-07-20 05:28 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
My library is a java native library.
It's was build by hp cc.
I have patch all as/ld patchs from hp site.
I read http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#hppa-hp-hpux11.
It's no doubt
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
