[Bug middle-end/17603] [4.0 Regression] cpowf and cpowl give wrong results

2004-11-01 Thread coyote at coyotegulch dot com
--- Additional Comments From coyote at coyotegulch dot com 2004-11-02 03:07 --- The problem is broader. For example, the Fortran 95 abs() intrinsic is also broken for x86_64 when compiled with -O1, as illustrated by the following Fortran 95 program (testing on my Opteron box with cvs

[Bug fortran/13490] Compiler rejects valid constant -2147483648 for 32-bit int

2004-10-28 Thread coyote at coyotegulch dot com
--- Additional Comments From coyote at coyotegulch dot com 2004-10-28 21:45 --- Patch committed after approval -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/17912] gfortran: Bogus Arithmetic overflow error, regression w.r.t. g77

2004-10-28 Thread coyote at coyotegulch dot com
-- Bug 17912 depends on bug 13490, which changed state. Bug 13490 Summary: Compiler rejects valid constant -2147483648 for 32-bit int http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13490 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug fortran/17912] gfortran: Bogus Arithmetic overflow error, regression w.r.t. g77

2004-10-28 Thread coyote at coyotegulch dot com
--- Additional Comments From coyote at coyotegulch dot com 2004-10-28 21:46 --- Patch committed after approval -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17912

[Bug fortran/13490] Compiler rejects valid constant -2147483648 for 32-bit int

2004-10-21 Thread coyote at coyotegulch dot com
--- Additional Comments From coyote at coyotegulch dot com 2004-10-22 00:05 --- When this topic came up last year, I was in favor of gfortran working like other Fortran 95 compilers, which accept minimum integer values of -(2**(n-1)). Several Fortran language lawyers insisted

[Bug fortran/17912] gfortran: Bogus Arithmetic overflow error, regression w.r.t. g77

2004-10-21 Thread coyote at coyotegulch dot com
--- Additional Comments From coyote at coyotegulch dot com 2004-10-22 00:07 --- An improved patch. See comments attached to PR13490, or the patch below: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg01876.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17912

[Bug fortran/16648] [gfortran] Does not support FLUSH intrinsic.

2004-10-19 Thread coyote at coyotegulch dot com
--- Additional Comments From coyote at coyotegulch dot com 2004-10-19 15:24 --- (In reply to comment #2) gfortran is missing 87 non-standard intrinsic functions and subroutines from g77 runtime library. I'll post the complete to fortran@ this weekend. Was that list ever posted

[Bug fortran/13490] Compiler rejects valid constant -2147483648 for 32-bit int

2004-10-19 Thread coyote at coyotegulch dot com
--- Additional Comments From coyote at coyotegulch dot com 2004-10-19 18:49 --- Posted a slightly revised patch, ten months after the first. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13490

[Bug fortran/17912] gfortran: Bogus Arithmetic overflow error, regression w.r.t. g77

2004-10-19 Thread coyote at coyotegulch dot com
--- Additional Comments From coyote at coyotegulch dot com 2004-10-19 18:54 --- I've posted an update to the original asymmetric integers patch, but it did not address this specific PR. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17912

[Bug fortran/17912] gfortran: Bogus Arithmetic overflow error, regression w.r.t. g77

2004-10-19 Thread coyote at coyotegulch dot com
--- Additional Comments From coyote at coyotegulch dot com 2004-10-19 19:06 --- Correction: My patch does fix this bug. See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg01613.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17912

[Bug bootstrap/18013] New: make install failure: cannot touch `testsuite_wchar_t': Permission denied

2004-10-15 Thread coyote at coyotegulch dot com
': Permission denied Product: gcc Version: 3.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: coyote at coyotegulch dot

[Bug libstdc++/18013] make install failure: cannot touch `testsuite_wchar_t': Permission denied

2004-10-15 Thread coyote at coyotegulch dot com
--- Additional Comments From coyote at coyotegulch dot com 2004-10-15 16:02 --- I can manually touch the file. The directory appears writable, and I have 40GB of free space. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/gnu/gcc-3.4/build-p4 $ ls /home/scott/gnu/gcc-3.4/build-p4/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3 -l

[Bug bootstrap/18015] New: No rule to make target 'gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/array', needed by `stamp-tr1'

2004-10-15 Thread coyote at coyotegulch dot com
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: coyote at coyotegulch dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18015

[Bug bootstrap/18015] No rule to make target 'gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/array', needed by `stamp-tr1'

2004-10-15 Thread coyote at coyotegulch dot com
--- Additional Comments From coyote at coyotegulch dot com 2004-10-15 16:27 --- This problem also occurs for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18015