http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227
Bug #: 56227
Summary: Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227
--- Comment #2 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2013-02-06
18:42:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Created attachment 29374 [details]
proposed patch to use HOST_LONG_LONG_FORMAT
Please try to bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227
--- Comment #3 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2013-02-06
18:50:34 UTC ---
There's another one on line 14622 of gcc/config/i386/i386.c.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227
--- Comment #4 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2013-02-06
18:54:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
There's another one on line 14622 of gcc/config/i386/i386.c.
Doing the same substitution as in ggc-page.c fixes it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227
--- Comment #5 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2013-02-06
19:03:10 UTC ---
../../gcc-4.8-20130203/gcc/lto/lto.c: In function 'void
lto_resolution_read(spla
y_tree, FILE*, lto_file*)':
../../gcc-4.8-20130203/gcc/lto/lto.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227
--- Comment #7 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2013-02-06
20:19:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
../../gcc-4.8-20130203/gcc/lto/lto.c: In function 'void
lto_resolution_read(spla
y_tree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111
Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
--- Comment #7 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2011-01-13
16:59:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I also was unable to get the procedure into a DLL with omission of DLLEXPORT,
instead attempting to get it in using a .DEF file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
--- Comment #11 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2011-01-13
19:56:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Please confirm that it works. (I know that it unfortunately might take a few
days until a newer MinGW build becomes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
--- Comment #12 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2011-01-14
00:10:29 UTC ---
Rather more tricky to get gcc built in mingw than I would have liked, but...
it's all fixed. I can export with DLLEXPORT or with a .def file.
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
--- Comment #6 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2011-01-12
14:11:28 UTC ---
I also was unable to get the procedure into a DLL with omission of DLLEXPORT,
instead attempting to get it in using a .DEF file and either gfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
Summary: DLLEXPORT attribute requires additional capabilities
to be useful
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
--- Comment #1 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2011-01-11
23:12:55 UTC ---
I've also tried using dlltool and a .def file to coerce my procedure into being
exported, with no luck. Does gfortran not support exporting a function?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37888
--- Comment #2 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2010-09-29
13:42:58 UTC ---
I'll try to find time to try again. I'm no longer at school as I was when I
reported the bug originally; I still have access to the systems I was using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37888
--- Comment #2 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2010-09-29
13:42:58 UTC ---
I'll try to find time to try again. I'm no longer at school as I was when I
reported the bug originally; I still have access to the systems I was using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37888
--- Comment #3 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2010-09-29
13:43:02 UTC ---
I'll try to find time to try again. I'm no longer at school as I was when I
reported the bug originally; I still have access to the systems I was using
16 matches
Mail list logo
