http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008
--- Comment #6 from Dave Boutcher daveboutcher at gmail dot com 2012-05-16
01:43:51 UTC ---
Thanks for the testcase Patrick. Let me dig into the pr51516.C failure before
I resubmit the patch with the testcase.
Torvald, as Patrick said
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008
--- Comment #3 from Dave Boutcher daveboutcher at gmail dot com 2012-05-08
22:56:23 UTC ---
I just submitted a patch for this one (Issue 6201064)
(http://codereview.appspot.com/6201064/)
Patch included here just for fun:
Index: gcc/trans-mem.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008
--- Comment #1 from Dave Boutcher daveboutcher at gmail dot com 2012-04-18
17:46:17 UTC ---
The problem seems to be that functions referenced only by function pointers are
not put in the tmclone table. I can work around the problem by making
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008
Bug #: 53008
Summary: abort in _ITM_getTMCloneSafe
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
