[Bug rust/108126] New: rust meets cppcheck

2022-12-15 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108126 Bug ID: 108126 Summary: rust meets cppcheck Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rust Assignee: una

[Bug ipa/108110] [13 Regression] ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700 with -std=c++14 -O3 -march=native

2022-12-15 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110 --- Comment #10 from David Binderman --- That's the bad revision. ipa: Better way of applying both IPA-CP and IPA-SRA (PR 103227)

[Bug ipa/108110] [13 Regression] ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700 with -std=c++14 -O3 -march=native

2022-12-15 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110 --- Comment #9 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #8) > 803a91330bf20174 seems bad, so trying 095a13eda2caf684. That seems bad, so trying 4834e9360f7bf42f.

[Bug ipa/108110] [13 Regression] ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700 with -std=c++14 -O3 -march=native

2022-12-15 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110 --- Comment #8 from David Binderman --- 803a91330bf20174 seems bad, so trying 095a13eda2caf684.

[Bug ipa/108110] [13 Regression] ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700 with -std=c++14 -O3 -march=native

2022-12-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mjambor at suse dot cz --- Comment #7

[Bug ipa/108110] [13 Regression] ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700 with -std=c++14 -O3 -march=native

2022-12-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110 --- Comment #6 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #5) > That revision seems good. Trying 7450b25566b7a738. Seems good. Trying 512098a3316f07d4.

[Bug ipa/108110] [13 Regression] ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700 with -std=c++14 -O3 -march=native

2022-12-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- That revision seems good. Trying 7450b25566b7a738. For the reduced code, -march=zen3 not required.

[Bug ipa/108110] [13 Regression] ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700 with -std=c++14 -O3 -march=native

2022-12-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- Git bisect now running. Trying 15f04af347e3b65f.

[Bug ipa/108110] [13 Regression] ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700 with -std=c++14 -O3 -march=native

2022-12-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- Reduced C++ code seems to be: namespace std { template struct integral_constant { static constexpr int value = __v; }; using true_type = integral_constant; using false_type = integral_constant; templat

[Bug rust/108111] New: Rust meets clang

2022-12-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108111 Bug ID: 108111 Summary: Rust meets clang Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rust Assignee: unassi

[Bug ipa/108110] ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700 with -std=c++14 -O3 -march=native

2022-12-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- CPU is AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, so -march flag is zen3.

[Bug c++/108110] New: ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700 with -std=c++14 -O3 -march=native

2022-12-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110 Bug ID: 108110 Summary: ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700 with -std=c++14 -O3 -march=native Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug c++/108047] ice: unexpected expression of kind implicit_conv_expr

2022-12-11 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/108047] ice: unexpected expression of kind implicit_conv_expr

2022-12-11 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- That worked fine, so trying 09c91caeb84e7c36.

[Bug c++/108047] ice: unexpected expression of kind implicit_conv_expr

2022-12-11 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- I am having a go at a git bisect. Trying 892e8c520be37d0a.

[Bug c++/108047] New: ice: unexpected expression of kind implicit_conv_expr

2022-12-10 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108047 Bug ID: 108047 Summary: ice: unexpected expression of kind implicit_conv_expr Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug tree-optimization/107937] [13 Regression] ice in find_var_cmp_const, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:257

2022-11-30 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107937 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- The bug first seems to appear sometime between git hash 4d08c674b0114622 from yesterday and d0a3d55ae4a2656f, from today.

[Bug c/107937] New: ice in find_var_cmp_const, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:257

2022-11-30 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107937 Bug ID: 107937 Summary: ice in find_var_cmp_const, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:257 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/107826] New: ice during GIMPLE pass: slp

2022-11-22 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107826 Bug ID: 107826 Summary: ice during GIMPLE pass: slp Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee

[Bug middle-end/107734] [13 Regression] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/cc.target/i386/pr46051.c

2022-11-17 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107734 --- Comment #10 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9) > Fixed. Thanks for that. Would it ok to manually check all uses of sbitmap, to make sure they initialise bits appropriately, or would it be better to define

[Bug c/107734] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/cc.target/i386/pr46051.c

2022-11-17 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107734 --- Comment #6 from David Binderman --- I am trying a bisect with git hash b4fca4fc70dc76cf.

[Bug c/107734] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/cc.target/i386/pr46051.c

2022-11-17 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107734 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- I have reduced one of the test cases downto this code: float val1f[][2], val2f[][2], chkf[][2]; foof_i; foof() { int j; foof_i = 0; for (; foof_i < 8; foof_i++) { float tmp = val1f[foof_i][j] *

[Bug c/107734] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/cc.target/i386/pr46051.c

2022-11-17 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107734 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- A third: ./gcc.target/i386/pr61403.c ==749959== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==749959==at 0x11DFAE7: bitmap_set_bit (sbitmap.h:137) ==749959==by 0x11DFAE7: gimple_sim

[Bug c/107734] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/cc.target/i386/pr46051.c

2022-11-17 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107734 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- Another test case: ./gcc.target/i386/pr53366-2.c ==41== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==41==at 0x11DFAE7: bitmap_set_bit (sbitmap.h:137) ==41==by 0x11DFAE

[Bug c/107734] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/cc.target/i386/pr46051.c

2022-11-17 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107734 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- git blame says dc95e1e970 (Hongyu Wang 2022-01-17 13:01:51 +0800 8292)if (!bitmap_set_bit (seen, sel[i].to_constant ()))

[Bug c/107734] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/cc.target/i386/pr46051.c

2022-11-17 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107734 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- The valgrind problem doesn't seem to occur with git hash 05432288d4e56055, dated 20221113, so the bug is recent. I used git hash 2b2f2ee49a33419f for today's build.

[Bug c/107734] New: valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/cc.target/i386/pr46051.c

2022-11-17 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107734 Bug ID: 107734 Summary: valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/cc.target/i386/pr46051.c Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/107243] ice in arithmetic_instr with invalid inline-asm and %I

2022-11-15 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107243 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Nothing has happened on this for over a month. The bug still exists in current sources.

[Bug tree-optimization/107668] [13 Regression] ICE: in clear_nan, at value-range.h:1167 with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow and _Complex int

2022-11-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668 --- Comment #6 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #5) > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #4) > > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #3) > > > Trying git revision 2d5c4a16dd833aa0. > > > > That loo

[Bug tree-optimization/107668] [13 Regression] ICE: in clear_nan, at value-range.h:1167 with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow and _Complex int

2022-11-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #4) > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #3) > > Trying git revision 2d5c4a16dd833aa0. > > That looks good. Trying 59a63247992eb131. Looks bad. Trying 2a1

[Bug tree-optimization/107668] [13 Regression] ICE: in clear_nan, at value-range.h:1167 with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow and _Complex int

2022-11-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #3) > Trying git revision 2d5c4a16dd833aa0. That looks good. Trying 59a63247992eb131.

[Bug tree-optimization/107668] [13 Regression] ICE: in clear_nan, at value-range.h:1167 with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow and _Complex int

2022-11-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- Trying git revision 2d5c4a16dd833aa0.

[Bug tree-optimization/107668] [13 Regression] ICE: in clear_nan, at value-range.h:1167 with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow and _Complex int

2022-11-13 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Reduced C++ code seems to be: --- /home/dcb36/cvise/bug862.cc --- float dot(); float intersectcylinder_md; void intersectcylinder(float &dist) { float nd = dot(); dist = 0 / nd; float offset = inter

[Bug tree-optimization/107668] [13 Regression] ICE: in clear_nan, at value-range.h:1167 with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow and _Complex int

2022-11-13 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107668 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/107609] New: ice in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791

2022-11-10 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107609 Bug ID: 107609 Summary: ice in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/107593] New: ice with -Wduplicated-cond

2022-11-09 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107593 Bug ID: 107593 Summary: ice with -Wduplicated-cond Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assigne

[Bug c/107510] New: gcc/config/gcn/gcn.cc:4930:9: style: Same expression on both sides of '||'. [duplicateExpression]

2022-11-02 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107510 Bug ID: 107510 Summary: gcc/config/gcn/gcn.cc:4930:9: style: Same expression on both sides of '||'. [duplicateExpression] Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/107435] [13 Regression] ice in build_vector_from_val, at tree.cc:2125

2022-10-27 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107435 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Reduced C code seems to be: struct qlist_head { struct qlist_head *next } qlist_add(struct qlist_head *new, struct qlist_head *head) { struct qlist_head *prev = head; new->next = head->next; prev-

[Bug c/107435] New: ice in build_vector_from_val, at tree.cc:2125

2022-10-27 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107435 Bug ID: 107435 Summary: ice in build_vector_from_val, at tree.cc:2125 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug preprocessor/88974] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in linemap_resolve_location)

2022-10-22 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88974 --- Comment #7 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > And this updated patch, while it bootstrapped, had quite a few testsuite > regressions. So, I'm afraid I don't know where would in some cases the > src_loc be

[Bug c++/107267] [13 Regression] ICE in cp_gimplify_init_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:253 since r13-3175-g6ffbf87ca66f4ed9

2022-10-20 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267 --- Comment #10 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8) > Started with r13-3175-g6ffbf87ca66f4ed9. So maybe it would be a good idea to assign this bug to Jason ?

[Bug c++/107267] ice in cp_gimplify_init_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:253

2022-10-16 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/107267] ice in cp_gimplify_init_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:253

2022-10-16 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267 --- Comment #6 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #5) > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #4) > > Trying a git bisect with git hash 93b3ab6c0c6a44df. > > Seems good. Trying eb491ea5c10955c6. Seems good.

[Bug c++/107267] ice in cp_gimplify_init_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:253

2022-10-16 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #4) > Trying a git bisect with git hash 93b3ab6c0c6a44df. Seems good. Trying eb491ea5c10955c6.

[Bug c++/107267] ice in cp_gimplify_init_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:253

2022-10-15 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- Trying a git bisect with git hash 93b3ab6c0c6a44df.

[Bug c++/107267] ice in cp_gimplify_init_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:253

2022-10-15 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- Reduced C++ code is template struct integral_constant { static constexpr int value = __v; }; template using __bool_constant = integral_constant<__v>; template struct __conditional { template using

[Bug c++/107267] ice in cp_gimplify_init_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:253

2022-10-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- There is only one mention of cp_gimplify_init_expr in that git range, and it is the final commit of Jason's, marked 6ffbf87ca66f4ed9cd79cff675fabe2109e46e85. Not a smoking gun, but possibly a lead candida

[Bug c++/107267] ice in cp_gimplify_init_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:253

2022-10-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- The compiler first seems to break sometime between git hash 8a9e92b249c9c5a5 and 6ffbf87ca66f4ed9, a day later. Reduction running.

[Bug c++/107267] New: ice in cp_gimplify_init_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:253

2022-10-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267 Bug ID: 107267 Summary: ice in cp_gimplify_init_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:253 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug tree-optimization/107244] error: invalid position or size in ‘bit_insert_expr’

2022-10-13 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107244 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- The bug first seems to occur sometime between git hash 248c8aeebc49aae3 and 637e3668fdc17c4e, a day later. Reduction running now.

[Bug c/107244] New: error: invalid position or size in ‘bit_insert_expr’

2022-10-13 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107244 Bug ID: 107244 Summary: error: invalid position or size in ‘bit_insert_expr’ Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug target/107243] New: ice in arithmetic_instr, at config/arm/arm.cc:2089

2022-10-12 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107243 Bug ID: 107243 Summary: ice in arithmetic_instr, at config/arm/arm.cc:2089 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug go/107203] Possible missing sanity check in gofrontend/ast-dump.cc ?

2022-10-10 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107203 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- git blame says: 706cd57f714f (Roberto Lublinerman 2011-08-24 19:22:44 + 278) ++it;

[Bug target/107204] New: gcc/config/sh/divtab-sh4.cc: 2 * possible float conversion overflow

2022-10-10 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107204 Bug ID: 107204 Summary: gcc/config/sh/divtab-sh4.cc: 2 * possible float conversion overflow Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/107203] New: Possible missing sanity check in gofrontend/ast-dump.cc ?

2022-10-10 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107203 Bug ID: 107203 Summary: Possible missing sanity check in gofrontend/ast-dump.cc ? Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c/92286] Possible improvement for -Wduplicated-cond warning

2022-10-10 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92286 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- A quick grep suggests two problems in gcc source code: trunk.git/gcc/ada/sysdep.c:423:26: style: Expression is always true because 'else if' condition is opposite to previous condition at line 415. [multiC

[Bug c/92286] Possible improvement for -Wduplicated-cond warning

2022-10-10 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92286 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/107197] valgrind error in function same_line_p during build

2022-10-10 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107197 --- Comment #6 from David Binderman --- Git hash 09df0d8b14dda66c seems good. Trying fce601fd07fd04f5.

[Bug c/107197] valgrind error in function same_line_p during build

2022-10-10 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107197 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- Git hash e2a228438919d846 seems good. Trying 09df0d8b14dda66c.

[Bug c/107197] valgrind error in function same_line_p during build

2022-10-09 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107197 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- 81 revisions to bisect. Trying e2a228438919d846.

[Bug c/107197] valgrind error in function same_line_p during build

2022-10-09 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107197 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Build with -O2 demonstrates the same valgrind problem, so someone this week, between the two git hashes mentioned, has broken the -O2 build. I haven't got the compute power here to do the bisect. Advice s

[Bug c/107197] valgrind error in function same_line_p during build

2022-10-09 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107197 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- I can tell you that last weekend's valgrind build with -O2 went fine. That was from git hash ca01d2526917ec6e. This weekend's valgrind build, with -O3 enabled, is from git hash 6ffbf87ca66f4ed9cd79cff675f

[Bug c/107197] New: valgrind error in function same_line_p during build

2022-10-09 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107197 Bug ID: 107197 Summary: valgrind error in function same_line_p during build Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c/107156] ice in lookup_attribute_by_prefix, at attribs.h:239

2022-10-05 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107156 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Co

[Bug c/107156] New: ice in lookup_attribute_by_prefix, at attribs.h:239

2022-10-05 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107156 Bug ID: 107156 Summary: ice in lookup_attribute_by_prefix, at attribs.h:239 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/107136] [13 Regression] File cp/cp-trait.def file not installed for plugin suport

2022-10-03 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107136 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > This is most likely the fix but I don't have time to test it right now" The obvious copy seems to fix the problem: [/home/dcb/gcc/trunk.git] $ cp ./gcc/cp/cp

[Bug plugins/107136] File cp-trait.def not found in kernel build

2022-10-03 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107136 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug plugins/107136] New: File cp-trait.def not found in kernel build

2022-10-03 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107136 Bug ID: 107136 Summary: File cp-trait.def not found in kernel build Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: plug

[Bug c++/107029] New: ice during GIMPLE pass: reassoc

2022-09-24 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107029 Bug ID: 107029 Summary: ice during GIMPLE pass: reassoc Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ As

[Bug tree-optimization/106970] [13 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:702 since r13-2713-g917461478d3bb733

2022-09-20 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106970 --- Comment #7 from David Binderman --- I am not too sure that what I found is the same as the original bug report. Reduced C code is: int script_obj_as_number_obj, script_obj_as_number_obj_0_0; double script_obj_as_number() { if (script_ob

[Bug tree-optimization/106970] [13 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:702 since r13-2713-g917461478d3bb733

2022-09-20 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106970 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/106909] [13 Regression] error: control flow in the middle of basic block

2022-09-12 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106909 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Created attachment 53566 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53566&action=edit C++ source code After an hour of reduction, this is what remains.

[Bug tree-optimization/106909] error: control flow in the middle of basic block

2022-09-12 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106909 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Git range seems to be cdcc27c1ca9c485c..a0f83501182de68f, some 30 commits.

[Bug c++/106909] New: error: control flow in the middle of basic block

2022-09-12 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106909 Bug ID: 106909 Summary: error: control flow in the middle of basic block Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/106907] gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc:23155: strange expression ?

2022-09-12 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106907 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- In the same file rs6000.cc, cppcheck produces: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc:28477:8: style: Same expression on both sides of '&&'. [duplicateExpression] Source code is info->all_words_same = (info-

[Bug target/106907] gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc:23155: strange expression ?

2022-09-12 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106907 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Wrong source code. It should be: if (swapped ^ !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN && icode != CODE_FOR_vsx_xxpermdi_v16qi) That looks like it could benefit from some ( and ). The source code I did mention

[Bug target/106907] New: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc:23155: strange expression ?

2022-09-12 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106907 Bug ID: 106907 Summary: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc:23155: strange expression ? Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug libgomp/106906] New: libgomp/env.c: 3 * boolean value assigned to pointer

2022-09-12 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106906 Bug ID: 106906 Summary: libgomp/env.c: 3 * boolean value assigned to pointer Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/106881] [13 Regression] ice in init_from_control_deps, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1740 since r13-2500-g0a4a2667dc115ca7

2022-09-09 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881 --- Comment #10 from David Binderman --- Created attachment 53554 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53554&action=edit gzipped C++ source code The attached C++ code, after Richard's fix, seems to break gcc. Flags -O1 -Wall re

[Bug c/106886] ice in vect_schedule_slp_node

2022-09-07 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106886 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Reduced C code seems to be: rl2GeomExport64_little_endian, rl2GeomExport64_little_endian_arch; rl2GeomExport64(unsigned char *p, double value) { union { unsigned char byte[8]; double double_valu

[Bug c/106886] ice in vect_schedule_slp_node

2022-09-07 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106886 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Git range seems to be 2985049049f12b0a..0b0a3cdbff64d97e, from near the start of the month. There are 29 commits in that range.

[Bug c/106886] New: ice in vect_schedule_slp_node

2022-09-07 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106886 Bug ID: 106886 Summary: ice in vect_schedule_slp_node Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assign

[Bug tree-optimization/106881] [13 Regression] ice in init_from_control_deps, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1740

2022-09-07 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Are you sure this was not already fixed by r13-2518-ga262f969d6fd936f4fb5 > (aka PR 106866) Pretty sure. The git range I gave includes this commit. Feel free

[Bug c/106881] ice in init_from_control_deps, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1740

2022-09-07 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Reduced C code seems to be: inline auto_free(void *a) { void **p = a; l_free(*p); } eap_gtc_check_settings() { char *identity __attribute__((cleanup(auto_free))); char password __attribute__((clea

[Bug c/106881] ice in init_from_control_deps, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1740

2022-09-07 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Git range seems to be d6582c662ca0da05..cdcc27c1ca9c485c, i.e. since yesterday.

[Bug c/106881] New: ice in init_from_control_deps, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1740

2022-09-07 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106881 Bug ID: 106881 Summary: ice in init_from_control_deps, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1740 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/106862] ice in compute_control_dep_chain, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1105

2022-09-07 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106862 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- Another test case, this time in C is: enum { GELB, VIOLETT } KABEL; typedef playground_t[][4][2]; int ToPlayground_0_0_0, PlayGame_countdown, PlayGame_count_tick_len, PlayGame_move_tick_len, ProcessCa

[Bug tree-optimization/106862] ice in compute_control_dep_chain, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1105

2022-09-06 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106862 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Reduced C++ code seems to be: extern fprintf(char); struct string { string(char); }; struct { call(); replace(string); } vsllib; struct ListNode { ListNode(); }; struct TestNode { TestNode(int);

[Bug tree-optimization/106862] ice in compute_control_dep_chain, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1105

2022-09-06 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106862 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- I have a cvise reduction running. The code is in C++, which cvise isn't very efficient at reducing, so I expect it will be some hours before I have any finished reduction.

[Bug c++/106862] New: ice in compute_control_dep_chain, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1105

2022-09-06 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106862 Bug ID: 106862 Summary: ice in compute_control_dep_chain, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1105 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/106841] ice in vect_get_vec_defs_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:1509

2022-09-05 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106841 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/106841] ice in vect_get_vec_defs_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:1509

2022-09-05 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106841 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- This bug looks to be at least a month old, since it started sometime before git hash 21c7aab09805d0c8, dated 20220808. I will have a go at a reduction.

[Bug c++/106841] New: ice in vect_get_vec_defs_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:1509

2022-09-05 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106841 Bug ID: 106841 Summary: ice in vect_get_vec_defs_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:1509 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/106824] ice in set_nan, at value-range.cc:283

2022-09-04 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106824 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #4) > Could you double check again on an updated trunk? Problem seems to have gone away on today's trunk.

[Bug c++/106824] ice in set_nan, at value-range.cc:283

2022-09-04 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106824 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/106824] ice in set_nan, at value-range.cc:283

2022-09-04 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106824 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- After more than 13 hours of reduction, the C++ code seems to be: using int32 = int; using int64 = long; float NoWeight___trans_tmp_2; int ShortestPath_distance; struct FloatWeightTpl { FloatWeightTpl(fl

[Bug c++/106824] ice in set_nan, at value-range.cc:283

2022-09-04 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106824 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- It seems that flag -O2 can be reduced to -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations.

[Bug c++/106824] New: ice in set_nan, at value-range.cc:283

2022-09-03 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106824 Bug ID: 106824 Summary: ice in set_nan, at value-range.cc:283 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/106794] [13 Regression] ice in vect_transform_slp_perm_load_1

2022-08-31 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106794 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Reduced code seems to be: template struct Vector3 { Vector3(); Vector3(T, T, T); T length() const; T x, y, z; }; template Vector3::Vector3(T _x, T _y, T _z) : x(_x), y(_y), z(_z) {} Vector3 cros

[Bug c++/106794] ice in vect_transform_slp_perm_load_1

2022-08-31 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106794 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Git hash range seems to be 4fbe3e6aa74dae5c..3de9fb3235998a05, a distance of 28 commits.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >