https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102327
Bug ID: 102327
Summary: gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c:14678: Suspicious coding
?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #5)
> with the latest GCC, for all the 42647 c files under gcc/testsuite, with -c
> -g -O2 -Wall -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero, there is only one failure:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
Bug ID: 102285
Summary: New flag -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero causes many
crashes in the testsuite
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102281
Bug ID: 102281
Summary: -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero causes ice
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102243
Bug ID: 102243
Summary: ice in get_range_query
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102200
Bug ID: 102200
Summary: ice in put_ref, at pointer-query.cc:1351
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64867
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102172
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
That's only 35 revisions, I'll have a go at a git bisect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102172
Bug ID: 102172
Summary: ice in determine_exit_conditions, at
tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:1049
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102078
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
> Full cppcheck error message is
>
> gcc/ada/affinity.c:59:19: error: Signed integer overflow for expression
> '1<
> I think cppcheck is worried if index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102078
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Full cppcheck error message is
gcc/ada/affinity.c:59:19: error: Signed integer overflow for expression
'1<
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102118
Bug ID: 102118
Summary: ice in merge, at ipa-modref-tree.h:203
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #9 from David Binderman ---
This second source code generates a similar but different error message:
void dnslabel_vector_dnslabel_to_dnsname_namestack(int bottom) {
char **name;
int top;
while (bottom <= top) {
char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102085
Bug ID: 102085
Summary: libsanitizer/asan/asan_errors.cpp:387: declaration and
definition do not match ?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102081
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102083
Bug ID: 102083
Summary: libiberty/simple-object-xcoff.c:844: pointless test
and assignment ?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102082
Bug ID: 102082
Summary: minor: 2 * pointless assignment to function parameters
?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102078
Bug ID: 102078
Summary: ffinity.c:59:19: error: Signed integer overflow ?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102074
Bug ID: 102074
Summary: include/bits/atomic_timed_wait.h:215: possible missing
return ?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102073
Bug ID: 102073
Summary: gcc/ada/socket.c: 2 * missing return
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102029
Bug ID: 102029
Summary: ice: error: type mismatch in ‘lshift_expr’
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101505
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> This is a different bug though, probably caused by HJs changes, looks like
> the fixed PR101742, indeed updating and re-building my dev tree makes the
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101505
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
Further research suggests it also crashes with amdfam10, athlon-fx,
athlon64, athlon64-sse3, barcelona, bdver1, bdver3, bdver4, btver1,
btver2, eden-x2, eden-x4, k8, k8-sse3, nano, nano-1000, nano-2000,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101505
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101720
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> I suppose this isn't a recent regression of some sorts?
Doubtful. I tried the system C++ compiler and got this:
$ time /usr/bin/g++ -c -O2 -g bug741.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101720
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 51240
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51240=edit
gzipped C source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101720
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
I have another C test case which seems to take a long time when
-g is switched on:
$ time /home/dcb/gcc/results.20210731.release/bin/gcc -c -O2 bug742.c
real1m45.778s
user1m40.487s
sys
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101720
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Strangely, changing the -O2 to -O3 and dropping the -g changes
the time to 3 minutes 49 seconds, so -g looks to be the culprit.
The source code is 5.9 Megs, the gcc build is a release build
and the test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101720
Bug ID: 101720
Summary: compile time hog with -g -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101642
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #3)
> In a git bisect, trying cf5f544227f16b63
Seems bad, so trying 1ab2270036dc0f2a.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101642
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
In a git bisect, trying cf5f544227f16b63
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101642
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Reduced code seems to be
short __bswap_16___bsx, Process_v1___trans_tmp_1;
int Process_v1_common_record;
char Process_v1_s2;
void Process_v1(void) {
Process_v1___trans_tmp_1 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101642
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Problem first seems to occur sometime between git hash ead235f60139edc6,
dated 20210724 and git hash fcc7c6369f7fbf29, dated today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101642
Bug ID: 101642
Summary: ice in decompose, at wide-int.h:984
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101511
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
I've had a go at a git bisect, but couldn't produce any sensible answers ;-<
Richard seems to think Andrew MacLeod may be helpful, so I am happy
to go with that.
For the git range I suggested, commits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101511
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ code seems to be:
void __assert_fail(char *, char *, int, const char *)
__attribute__((__noreturn__));
template void test_uint() {
long __trans_tmp_3, __trans_tmp_1;
int Error;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101511
Bug ID: 101511
Summary: ice in query_relation, at value-relation.cc:879
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101507
Bug ID: 101507
Summary: ice for gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-69.c with
-march=iwmmxt
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101497
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101497
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #0)
> > > Bug first seems to occur sometime between git hash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101497
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #0)
> > Bug first seems to occur sometime between git hash 7466a0a5d8d536ab
> > and 94ba897be8b59ef5
>
> So between
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101496
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101496
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #3)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #0)
> > > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101496
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #0)
> > > Bug first seems to occur sometime after git hash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101496
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #0)
> > Bug first seems to occur sometime after git hash 42ff474e28fa3c85
> > but before cca7eb8f7cc157ed.
>
> So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101497
Bug ID: 101497
Summary: ice in type, at value-range.h:221
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101496
Bug ID: 101496
Summary: ice during GIMPLE pass: evrp
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #58 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #57)
> Can you please build options-save.c with -O0 and debug it:
Good idea, but I have run out of time on this issue.
Another 40 or so interesting commits have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101292
Bug ID: 101292
Summary: recent valgrind error in warning-control.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #56 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #55)
> >
> > with line numbers please :)
>
> cat -n can do that
Sorry, I went a bit hard-of-thinking there.
13029 void
13030 cl_optimization_compare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #53 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #52)
> > 2 | #pragma GCC pop_options
> > | ^~~
> > 0xe8f7c3 cl_optimization_compare(gcc_options*, gcc_options*)
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #51 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #50)
> Thanks for it. For some reason, I can't still reproduce it. Please provide
> the output of -v option here.
Reading specs from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #49 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 51095
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51095=edit
C source code
Command line is
/home/dcb/gcc/working/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/dcb/gcc/working/./gcc/ -g -O3 -march
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #47 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #46)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #43)
> > Rebroken, this time during bootstrap, so much more serious.
>
> > I'll have a go at dropping the -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #46 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #43)
> Rebroken, this time during bootstrap, so much more serious.
> I'll have a go at dropping the -O3 -march=native back downto
> -O2 and see what happens.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #45 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #44)
> What CPU do you have?
AMD FX-8350.
> What -march=native expands to (-v argument).
bdver2
> Can you please attach the pre-processed source file.
I'll
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #43 from David Binderman ---
Rebroken, this time during bootstrap, so much more serious.
/home/dcb/gcc/working/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/dcb/gcc/working/./gcc/
-B/home/dcb/gcc/results.20210701/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101242
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
> Created attachment 51078 [details]
> gzipped C++ source code
>
> I also see this with -O3 with the attached C++ code.
Poor example - too big to reduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101242
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101230
Bug ID: 101230
Summary: ice in fold_cond_expr_with_comparison
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101220
Bug ID: 101220
Summary: arm: iwmmxt2: generating bad assembler ?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101219
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ code seems to be:
class PCEFast_PSG {
void UpdateOutput_Noise(int, int *);
};
template void PCEFast_PSGRunChannel() {
void (PCEFast_PSG::*ch_0)(int, int *);
_PSG::UpdateOutput_Noise ==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101219
Bug ID: 101219
Summary: ice in perform_or_defer_access_check
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101204
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
If there is some confusion as to which commit caused the problem,
I can do a git bisect.
Not before Tuesday 19 June. I have quite a few things in my intray right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101204
Bug ID: 101204
Summary: infinite recursion in gtype-desc.c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101202
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> I'll see to test the patch with -O3 bootstrap then - thanks for the info.
You are very welcome.
With the benefit of hindsight, changes in the -O3 area of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101202
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101176
Bug ID: 101176
Summary: valgrind error for
c-c++-common/builtin-has-attribute.c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101122
Bug ID: 101122
Summary: ice in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101045
Bug ID: 101045
Summary: config/i386/subst.md: 76: possible cut'n'paste error ?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101038
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101038
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ code is:
typedef char quint8;
typedef struct {
quint8 green, blue;
} CharPixel;
CharPixel *equalize_equalize_map;
int equalize_i;
void equalize() {
unsigned low_0, high_0, low_1, high_1;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101038
Bug ID: 101038
Summary: ice in vect_optimize_slp
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100530
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101012
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C code seems to be:
putRGBAAseparate8bittile_w(int *cp, unsigned char *g) {
char *a, *r;
unsigned *b;
int _x;
for (; _x; _x -= 8) {
*cp++ = *r++ | (unsigned)*g++ << 8 | *b++ << 16 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101012
Bug ID: 101012
Summary: ice in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100984
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100984
Bug ID: 100984
Summary: gimple-ssa-evrp.c: mismatched new and delete
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100925
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
That one seems bad, so current range is (ea418485c700494c..d2d74c9fc0cf46f6),
so 15 revisions left.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100925
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #1)
> Seems ok at ea418485c700494c. Trying 7ed1cd9665d8ca0f
Tried it and it seems bad. Range seems to be (ea418485c700494c,
7ed1cd9665d8ca0f).
Trying
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100925
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Seems ok at ea418485c700494c. Trying 7ed1cd9665d8ca0f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100925
Bug ID: 100925
Summary: tree check fail in make_range_step, at
fold-const.c:5061
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100913
Bug ID: 100913
Summary: cppcheck: 2 * pointless new assignments in the parser
?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100773
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> Yes, this fixed that.
I've just checked and yes, I agree.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100773
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Seems bad at b6bdd7a4cb41ee05, so the current range is
10b286ce335cca13..b6bdd7a4cb41ee05, or about 6 revisions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100773
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Seems fine at 10b286ce335cca13. Trying b6bdd7a4cb41ee05.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100773
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Seems fine at 4b1987f8ad382a6c. Trying 10b286ce335cca13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100773
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
I will have a go at doing a git bisect. 51 commits to start with.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100773
Bug ID: 100773
Summary: ice in operator[], at vec.h:890
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100513
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100722
Bug ID: 100722
Summary: ice in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100369
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #1)
> Can you share details on how you get this error? (GCC configure options,
> command-line used to compile the testcase)
configure is
CC="clang -Wall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98218
--- Comment #15 from David Binderman ---
Bug first appears sometime between git hash 21dfb22920ce32fc,
dated yesterday and git hash 097fde5e7514e909, dated today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98218
--- Comment #14 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13)
> A wild guess: you are compiling for TARGET_XOP?
Not sure. bdver2.
Reduced C code:
typedef float DBL;
struct {
DBL c_x, c_y
} Random_Simis_Cur;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98218
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100445
--- Comment #14 from David Binderman ---
AFAIK, yes. I didn't try out the gcc/testsuite, but I did try out
all the places (about 20) where fedora rawhide failed to build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100418
--- Comment #15 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> This PR is about amdgcn ICEs, so please move x86 related ICEs to a different
> PR, they have nothing to do with this bug.
Done. Please see # 100445.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100445
Bug ID: 100445
Summary: ice during RTL pass: vregs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
801 - 900 of 1078 matches
Mail list logo
