--- Additional Comments From denis dot nagorny at intel dot com 2005-06-22
14:34 ---
Ok. It seems like this issue is mostly fixed now. I incresead NIT counter up
to 200 and obtained following results:
3.4.2 ~ 3.4s
old 4.0 ~ 6.4s
mainline ~ 4.0s
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
ReportedBy: denis dot nagorny at intel dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i586-suse-linux
GCC host triplet: i586-suse-linux
GCC target triplet: i586-suse-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20945
--- Additional Comments From denis dot nagorny at intel dot com 2005-04-11
13:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=8591)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8591action=view)
Test for results reproducing
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20945
.galgel testing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: denis dot nagorny at intel dot com
--- Additional Comments From denis dot nagorny at intel dot com 2005-02-17
13:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=8214)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8214action=view)
sample for error reproducing
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20026
